Author

admin

Browsing

Perth, Australia (ABN Newswire) – Altech Batteries Limited (ASX:ATC,OTC:ALTHF) (FRA:A3Y) (OTCMKTS:ALTHF) is pleased to announce that it has received official written confirmation for the grant qualification of the CERENERGY(R) sodium-chloride solid-state battery project in Saxony, Germany to the value of 30% of the total capital expenditure excluding working capital, financing cost and interest during construction amounting to EUR46,725,802.

Highlights

– Altech Batteries GmbH’s CERENERGY(R) battery project has been approved by Germany’s Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy as eligible for Grant receipt under the ‘STARK'(1) economic development program

– Altech Batteries GmbH’s CERENERGY(R) battery project passed the second stage of Government approval for a 30% CAPEX grant in the amount of 46.7 million Euro

– The grant approval is not yet final and conditional and subject to overall financial close and the availability of funds to be approved by the German parliament as part of the 2026 Government Budget

(1) STARK – Starkung der Transformationsdynamik und Aufbruch in den Revieren und an den Kohlekraftwerkstandorten

The STARK program supports projects that support the transformation process towards an ecologically, economically, and socially sustainable economic structure in the coal regions and is initiated by the German Federal Government and supported by the EU

Altech has been actively applying for various grants offered by the State of Saxony, Federal Government of Germany, and the European Union. The State of Saxony and Brandenburg, along with the European Union, offer substantial support for renewable energy projects, including grants under the STARK program aimed at converting lignite coal to renewable energy sources. These grants are part of broader efforts to transition regions dependent on fossil fuels toward sustainable energy solutions. Altech’s site, located in these areas, stands to benefit from various funding programs designed to support clean energy projects, including EU grants for energy transformation and innovation.

Having now received written confirmation of the STARK program for the CERENERGY(R) project, it is a great sign of support and a recognition of this innovative battery technology jointly undertaken by Altech and the Fraunhofer Gesellschaft.

About Altech Batteries Ltd:

Altech Batteries Limited (ASX:ATC,OTC:ALTHF) (FRA:A3Y) is a specialty battery technology company that has a joint venture agreement with world leading German battery institute Fraunhofer IKTS (‘Fraunhofer’) to commercialise the revolutionary CERENERGY(R) Sodium Alumina Solid State (SAS) Battery. CERENERGY(R) batteries are the game-changing alternative to lithium-ion batteries. CERENERGY(R) batteries are fire and explosion-proof; have a life span of more than 15 years and operate in extreme cold and desert climates. The battery technology uses table salt and is lithium-free; cobalt-free; graphite-free; and copper-free, eliminating exposure to critical metal price rises and supply chain concerns.

The joint venture is commercialising its CERENERGY(R) battery, with plans to construct a 100MWh production facility on Altech’s land in Saxony, Germany. The facility intends to produce CERENERGY(R) battery modules to provide grid storage solutions to the market.

Source:
Altech Batteries Ltd

Contact:
Corporate
Iggy Tan
Managing Director
Altech Batteries Limited
Tel: +61-8-6168-1555
Email: info@altechgroup.com

Martin Stein
Chief Financial Officer
Altech Batteries Limited
Tel: +61-8-6168-1555
Email: info@altechgroup.com

News Provided by ABN Newswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Perth, Australia (ABN Newswire) – Locksley Resources Ltd (ASX:LKY) (OTCMKTS:LKYRF) is pleased to announce the appointment of Mr Pat Burke as Non-Executive Chairman. Mr Burke brings proven experience and success in advancing rare earth element (REE) projects and has significant corporate governance expertise, ASX listed leadership experience and a strong track record in the resources sector.

In his role as Executive Chairman of Meteoric Resources NL (ASX:MEI), MC ~$370m, he oversaw the transformative acquisition and advancement of the Caldeira ionic clay REE project in Brazil, one of the world’s largest high grade ionic clay rare earth deposits. Mr Burke was actively involved in all aspects of the project’s initial progression, including negotiations with government agencies, local partners and funders.

He is a qualified lawyer, with over 20 years legal and corporate advisory experience. Mr Burke’s legal expertise is in corporate, commercial and securities law. His corporate advisory experience includes identification of acquisition targets, deal structuring and financing and project development.

He has held Board roles across numerous ASX companies, as well as AIM and NASDAQ-listed companies, including Mandrake Resources and Vulcan Energy Resources.

Locksley is entering a significant growth phase as it advances its Mine to Market Strategy. In conjunction with Mr Burke’s appointment, Mr Nathan Lude will transition from Chairman to the newly created role of Head of Strategy, Capital Markets & Commercialisation. This reflects the Company’s focus on advancing its U.S. minerals projects, processing pathways and downstream critical minerals and technology initiatives. In this role Mr Lude will dedicate his time to:

Downstream Technology & Commercialisation

– Coordinating Locksley’s collaboration with Rice University to fast-track antimony extraction, processing and energy storage innovation

– Securing commercial licensing opportunities, pilot site identification, and deployments

– Driving the establishment and contributions of Locksley’s U.S. subsidiary and Advisory Board

Strategic Partnerships & Government Engagement

– Building strategic partnerships and alliances with U.S. defense, energy, and targeted technology sectors

– Coordinating engagement through GreenMet, including submissions to U.S. federal and state government programs and funding opportunities such as the DOE, DoD, and EXIM Bank

Capital Markets & Investor Growth

– Overseeing marketing, investor relations, and public relations

– Coordinating with ASX funds and investors, while expanding the U.S. investor base via OTCQB

– Assessing growth pathways to OTCQX, NASDAQ, SPAC structures, and Frankfurt listing

Mr Lude commented:

‘Locksley has rapidly advanced its growth strategy in recent months, advancing both upstream project development and new downstream opportunities. This change allows me to focus on our Mine to Market initiatives in the U.S., where our projects and partnerships can meaningfully strengthen America’s critical minerals supply chain. With Pat leading the Board, drawing on his experience and success in identifying and advancing the Meteoric REE opportunity and his deep industry knowledge on critical minerals, I can dedicate my time to building the business foundations for Locksley’s next phase of investor growth.’

Mr Burke commented:

‘Locksley’s integrated approach from resource development through to downstream processing and advanced applications is well aligned with the current U.S. focus on secure, strategic critical minerals supply chains. I look forward to working with the Board and management to advance the Company’s portfolio and deliver value for shareholders.’

About Locksley Resources Limited:

Locksley Resources Limited (ASX:LKY) (OTCMKTS:LKYRF) is an ASX-listed explorer focused on critical minerals in the United States of America. The Company is actively advancing exploration across the Mojave Project in California, targeting rare earth elements (REEs) and antimony. Locksley Resources aims to generate shareholder value through strategic exploration, discovery and development of critical minerals for U.S.

Mojave Project

Located in the Mojave Desert, California, the Mojave Project comprises over 240 claims across two contiguous prospect areas, namely, the North Block-Northeast Block and the El Campo Prospect. The North Block directly abuts claims held by MP Materials, while El Campo lies along strike of the Mountain Pass Mine and is enveloped by MP Materials’ claims, highlighting the strong geological continuity and exploration potential of the project area.

In addition to rare earths, the Mojave Project hosts the historic ‘Desert Antimony Mine’, which last operated in 1937. Despite the United States currently having no domestic antimony production, demand for the metal remains high due to its essential role in defense systems, semiconductors, and metal alloys. With surface samples grading up to 46% Sb as well as silver up to 1,022 g/t Ag, the Desert Mine prospect represents one of the highest-grade known antimony occurrences in the U.S.

Locksley’s North American position is further strengthened by rising geopolitical urgency to diversify supply chains away from China, the global leader in both REE & antimony production. With its maiden drilling program planned, the Mojave Project is uniquely positioned to align with U.S. strategic objectives around critical mineral independence and economic security.

Source:
Locksley Resources Limited

Contact:
Nathan Lude
Chairman
Locksley Resources Limited
T: +61 8 9481 0389

News Provided by ABN Newswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Q2 2025 Quarter Highlights

  • Q2 2025 production of 7,396 Gold Equivalent Ounces (GEOs)
  • Q2 2025 sales of 8,556 GEOs
  • Consolidated cash costs of $1,413 per GEO sold and consolidated all-in sustaining costs (‘AISC’) of $1,541 for Q2 2025
  • The Company is on track to achieve its annual sales guidance of 31,000 to 41,000 GEOs, annual cash cost of $1,800-1,900 per GEO sold and AISC of $1,950-2,100 per GEO sold for 2025
  • Mine operating earnings of $14.3M in Q2 2025
  • Closing the quarter with $29.7M in cash, $51.7 million in working capital and no debt

Heliostar Metals Ltd. (TSXV: HSTR,OTC:HSTXF) (OTCQX: HSTXF) (FSE: RGG1) (‘Heliostar’ or the ‘Company’) today reported unaudited financial results for the three months ended June 30, 2025 (‘Q2 2025’), which corresponds to the first quarter of Heliostar’s fiscal reporting year 2025. Results are presented in US dollars, unless stated.

Heliostar CEO, Charles Funk, commented, ‘Q2 2025 was another strong quarter for Heliostar with the mines continuing to perform as expected, funding our production and resource growth programs, and further strengthening our financial position. Our consolidated margin continues to expand in a strong gold price environment, with the Company reporting an operating margin of 51%. Looking forward, the Company is restarting mining at San Agustin in late 2025 and expects to expand its production profile in Q4 2025 and into 2026. We continue to deliver on our commitment to grow the Company to a mid-tier gold producer.

‘The strong balance sheet and operating cash flow allow Heliostar to accelerate our growth plans. At La Colorada, we are drilling additional historical stockpiles with the objective of extending production through 2026 ahead of the planned pit expansion at Veta Madre. At San Agustin, the Company has satisfied all permitting requirements to develop the Corner area, and preparations are ongoing to restart mine operations before the end of the year. This restart is fully funded from cash on the Company’s balance sheet. Further, the Company has committed to an expanded $9.5 million program at Ana Paula in 2025, including a minimum 15,000 metre drilling with the objective of delivering mineral reserves to support a 10-year life of mine in the upcoming feasibility study.

‘In the quarter, the Company has been working on a number of technical reports to unlock additional value from our assets. The slightly delayed, updated La Colorada technical report will be completed in the coming weeks. A pre-feasibility study is planned for Cerro Del Gallo this year, and the feasibility study for Ana Paula is continuing to progress.’

Second Quarter 2025 Quarterly Conference Call

Heliostar will host a quarterly conference call on Thursday, September 4, 2025, at 11:00 AM, Eastern Time/8:00 AM Pacific Time. The call will provide a corporate update following the release of our financial and operating results for the second quarter of 2025.

Please use the link here to register for the call or visit the Company website at www.heliostarmetals.com.

Q2 2025 Operational and Financial Highlights

Total gold production of 7,396 gold equivalent ounces (‘GEO’) (7,262 gold ounces) in Q2 2025. Gold production was realized from mining the Junkyard Stockpile at the La Colorada mine, as well as re-leaching the previously stacked ore at the La Colorada and the San Agustin mines. Consolidated production also benefited from a nominal contribution from residual production from the rinsing of residual leach pads at the El Castillo mine. Production year-to-date (‘YTD’) 2025 is consistent with the 2025 guidance issued by the Company on February 4, 2025, which remains unchanged.

Total Cash Cost of $1,413 per GEO produced in Q2 2025. The combined YTD cash cost (see ‘Non-IFRS Measures’) is $1,257 per GEO.

Total AISC of $1,541 per GEO sold in Q2 2025. The consolidated YTD AISC (see ‘Non-IFRS Measures’) is $1,602 per GEO.

Both Total Cash Costs and AISC are ahead of the 2025 guidance range; however, the Company anticipates costs will increase in the latter half of the year as residual leaching at San Agustin declines ahead of stacking new ore from the Corner area, and particularly due to one-off capital costs incurred to restart primary mining from the Corner area.

Mine Operating Earnings of $14.3 million in Q2 2025. The Company continued to report strong results in Q2 2025, with continued improvements in operating performance, as well as benefiting from selling into a rising gold market. Mine operating earnings YTD 2025 are $26.1 million.

Net income attributable to shareholders of $1.9 million, or $0.01 per share, for Q2 2025. Net income of $1.9 million ($0.01 per share) for Q2 2025 compared to a net loss attributable to shareholders of $2.3 million ($0.01 loss per share) for Q2 2024.

Strengthened financial position and liquidity. On June 30, 2025, the Company had cash of $29.7 million and working capital (defined as current assets less current liabilities) of $51.7 million, with an increase in working capital of $10.1 million over the prior quarter. As of June 30, 2025, the Company had no debt.

Achieved stable production at La Colorada mine. The mining of new ore restarted at the Junkyard Stockpile in January 2025. Production from the Junkyard Stockpile has increased steadily during Q2 2025, with operating costs as expected, grade in line with the reserve model and ore tonnes reconciling slightly higher than expected. Production YTD 2025 was 7,850 GEOs (7,572 gold ounces). Ore feed from the Junkyard Stockpile is planned to continue into 2026, with other historical stockpiles identified to provide additional material to be crushed and stacked on the leach pad thereafter. Further, subject to receiving certain regulatory approvals, the Company intends to expand the Veta Madre pit to exploit 43k ounces of gold reserves.

Restart of mining at San Agustin. The Company was able to complete the regulatory requirements to enable the approval to restart mining at San Agustin from the Corner area. Preparation work to commence mining is underway, and the Company anticipates production from the Corner starting in Q4 2025 and continuing into 2027. Recoverable reserves at the Corner are estimated at 44.5k ounces of gold.

Continuing to advance the development of the flagship Ana Paula Project. In July 2025, the Company commenced an expanded $9.5 million exploration and development program, including a minimum 15,000 metre drill program at Ana Paula Project. The program has the objective of upgrading existing inferred mineral resources to demonstrate more than a 10-year mine life in the upcoming feasibility study. Technical and regulatory programs are being advanced in parallel and will continue through 2026 to complete a bankable feasibility study.

Preparation of updated technical reports. The Company is concluding an updated technical report for La Colorada and is planning to complete a prefeasibility study (‘PFS’) for the Cerro del Gallo Project in 2025 and continues to advance the Ana Paula Project feasibility study.

Operational and Financial Results

Results are reported for the three months ended June 30, 2025 (‘Q2 2025’), which corresponds to the first quarter of Heliostar’s fiscal reporting year 2026.

A summary of the Company’s consolidated operational and financial results for the reporting period is presented below:

Key Performance Metrics Q2 2025 Q2 2024
Operational
Gold produced 7,262 0
Gold equivalent ounces (‘GEOs’) produced 7,419 0
Gold sold 8,375 0
Gold equivalent ounces (‘GEOs’) sold 8,556 0
Cash cost1 1,413 0
All-in sustaining costs1 (‘AISC’) 1,541 0
Financial (in ‘000s)
Revenues 27,926 0
Mine operating earnings 14,256 0
Exploration expenses 1,916 1,502
Net income (loss) 1,892 (2,293)
Cash 29,703 2,379
Total assets 122,943 22,574
Working Capital 51,687 (1,121)

 

  1. Non-IFRS measure. Refer to the ‘Non-IFRS Measures’ section of this news release.

Operational Review

Consolidated Production and Costs

Q2 2025 was the Company’s third reporting period with metals production. The Company had no production in Q2 2024.

Gold production of 7,396 GEOs (7,262 gold ounces) for Q2 2025 was reported from the La Colorada mine and the San Agustin mine, with a nominal amount reported from the El Castillo mine, which has commenced reclamation. The combined YTD 2025 production of 16,477 GEOs of gold (16,039 gold ounces) is consistent with the 2025 guidance issued by the Company.

The combined cash costs for the producing operations were $1,413 per GEO sold, and the consolidated AISC was $1,541 per GEO sold. The combined cash costs and AISC are currently ahead of the 2025 guidance issued by the Company, and full-year results are expected to be within the guidance range.

La Colorada Mine

Operating results for Q2 2025 were as follows:

La Colorada Q2 2025 YTD 2025
Gold produced oz 3,464 7,572
Gold equivalent ounces (‘GEOs’) produced GEO 3,538 7,850
Gold sold oz 3,631 6,743
Gold equivalent ounces (‘GEOs’) sold GEO 3,747 6,997
Cash cost1 $/GEO sold 1,296 1,101
All-in sustaining costs1 (‘AISC’) $/GEO sold 1,425 1,232

 

In January 2025, mining of new ore restarted at the Junkyard Stockpile by the Company, alongside re-leach activities started by the previous operator.

During the reporting period, the La Colorada mine produced 3,538 GEOs (3,464 gold ounces). Total revenues of $12.0 million were reported from sales of 3,747 GEOs. A series of actions were implemented at La Colorada to improve re-leaching performance, with gold production from re-leaching exceeding plans. Production from the Junkyard Stockpile has increased steadily during Q2 2025 and continues to meet all expected parameters.

For the reporting period, cash costs were $1,296 per GEO ($1,101 per GEO YTD 2025), and AISC was $1,425 per GEO ($1,232 per GEO YTD 2025), currently an improvement on 2025 guidance.

The Company plans to continue mining of the Junkyard Stockpile through 2025 and into 2026, with other historical stockpiles identified to provide additional, continued feed to the crushers thereafter. Further, subject to receiving certain regulatory approvals, the Company intends to expand the Veta Madre pit to exploit 43k ounces of gold reserve, which will be timed sequentially with the ore feeds from the historical stockpiles.

San Agustin Mine

Operating results for Q2 2025 were as follows:

San Agustin Q2 2025 YTD 2025
Gold produced oz 3,564 7,975
Gold equivalent ounces (‘GEOs’) produced GEO 3,622 8,129
Gold sold oz 4,595 8,752
Gold equivalent ounces (‘GEOs’) sold GEO 4,660 8,930
Cash cost1 $/GEO sold $ 1,529 1,407
All-in sustaining costs1 (‘AISC’) $/GEO sold $ 1,597 1,485

 

In September 2024, the previous owners of San Agustin placed the mine under care and maintenance, with metals production continuing from the re-leaching of residual leach pads.

During the reporting period, the San Agustin mine produced 3,622 GEOs (3,564 gold ounces). Total revenues of $14.9 million were reported from sales of 4,660 GEOs. A series of actions were implemented at San Agustin to improve re-leaching performance, with gold production from re-leaching exceeding 2025 guidance.

For the reporting period, cash costs were $1,529 per GEO ($1,407 per GEO YTD 2025), and the consolidated AISC was $1,597 per GEO ($1,485 per GEO YTD 2025), which is currently an improvement on 2025 guidance.

The Company has completed regulatory requirements to enable the restart of mining at San Agustin from the Corner area (see News Release dated July 22, 2025). Work to commence mining is underway, including administrative programs and small ancillary capital projects, and the Company anticipates production from the Corner starting in Q4 2025 and continuing into 2027. Recoverable reserves at the Corner are estimated at 44.5k ounces of gold.

El Castillo Mine

Operating results for Q2 2025 were as follows:

El Castillo Q2 2025 YTD 2025
Gold produced oz 234 491
Gold equivalent ounces (‘GEOs’) produced GEO 236 499
Gold sold oz 149 646
Gold equivalent ounces (‘GEOs’) sold GEO 150 652
Cash cost1 $/GEO sold 782 866
All-in sustaining costs1 (‘AISC’) $/GEO sold 2,679 1,729

 

In late 2022, the previous owners of El Castillo placed the mine under care and maintenance, and the mine is now considered in reclamation. Some nominal metal production has been possible from the rinsing of residual heap leach pad during reclamation activities.

During the reporting period, the El Castillo mine produced 236 GEOs (234 gold ounces). Total revenues of $0.5 million were reported from sales of 150 GEOs.

Reclamation expenditures at the El Castillo mine for the three months ended June 30, 2025, were $nil; however, $1.1 million was incurred in indirect reclamation expenditures for maintenance of land, permits and general expenses required to maintain the site in good standing. Further reclamation work will continue to be performed in 2025.

Ana Paula Project

Development and Exploration expenditures at the flagship Ana Paula Project were $0.8 million in Q2 2025 ($1.2 million in Q2 2024).

During Q2 2025, the Company initiated a $9.5 million exploration and development budget, including a minimum 15,000 metre drilling program at Ana Paula with the objective of delivering mineral reserves to support a 10-year life of mine. On August 27, 2025, the Company announced initial results from the first resource conversion holes, including 30.2 metres at 6.29 grams per tonne gold.

During Q2 2025, the Company completed trade-off studies and determined a preferred process flowsheet for the project. Technical and regulatory programs are being advanced and will continue through 2026 to complete a bankable feasibility study.

Cerro del Gallo Project

The process of advancing the additional development and engineering required at the Cerro del Gallo Project is ongoing.

During Q2 2025, the Company began a strategic review of the Project and initiated technical programs with the objective of identifying and evaluating the next development steps.

During Q2 2025, the Company commissioned the preparation of a prefeasibility study for the Cerro del Gallo Project. The study is planned to be completed in 2025. All major environmental and other permits will need to be obtained before an investment decision can be considered by the Company.

Funding Overview

In the three months ended June 30, 2025, 5,254,548 warrants and 422,082 stock options were exercised for total proceeds of $1.3 million and 906,249 RSUs were converted.

As of June 30, 2025, the Company had no debt.

Non-IFRS Measures. This news release refers to certain financial measures, such as all-in-sustaining costs, which are not measures recognized under IFRS and do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS. These measures may differ from those made by other companies and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such measures as reported by other companies. These measures have been derived from the Company’s financial statements because the Company believes that they are of assistance in understanding the results of operations and its financial position. Certain additional disclosures for these specified financial measures have been incorporated by reference and can be found in the Company’s MD&A for Q4 2024, available on SEDAR+.

Cash costs. The Company uses cash costs per ounce of metals sold to monitor its operating performance internally. The most directly comparable measure prepared in accordance with IFRS is the cost of sales. The Company believes this measure provides investors and analysts with useful information about its underlying cash costs of operations. The Company also believes it is a relevant metric used to understand its operating profitability and ability to generate cash flow. Cash costs are measures developed by metals companies in an effort to provide a comparable standard; however, there can be no assurance that the Company’s reporting of these non-IFRS financial measures are similar to those reported by other mining companies. They are widely reported in the metals mining industry as a benchmark for performance, but do not have a standardized meaning and are disclosed in addition to IFRS financial measures. Cash costs include production costs, refinery and transportation costs and extraordinary mining duty. Cash costs exclude non-cash depreciation and depletion and site share-based compensation.

AISC. All-in Sustaining Costs (‘AISC’) more fully defines the total costs associated with producing precious metals. The AISC is calculated based on guidelines published by the World Gold Council (‘WGC’), which were first issued in 2013. In light of new accounting standards and to support further consistency of application, the WGC published an updated Guidance Note in 2018. Other companies may calculate this measure differently because of differences in underlying principles and policies applied. Differences may also arise due to a different definition of sustaining versus growth capital. Note that with respect to AISC metrics within the technical reports, because such economics are disclosed at the project level, corporate general and administrative expenses were not included in the AISC calculations.

Statement of Qualified Persons

Gregg Bush, P.Eng., Mike Gingles, and Stewart Harris, P. Geo., Qualified Persons, as such term is defined by National Instrument 43-101 — Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, have reviewed the scientific and technical information that forms the basis for this news release and have approved the disclosure herein. Mr. Bush is employed as Chief Operating Officer of the Company, Mr. Gingles is employed as Vice President of Corporate Development, and Mr. Harris is employed as Exploration Manager.

About Heliostar Metals Ltd.

Heliostar aims to grow to become a mid-tier gold producer. The Company is focused on increasing production and developing new resources at the La Colorada and San Agustin mines in Mexico, and on developing the 100% owned Ana Paula Project in Guerrero, Mexico.

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT:

Charles Funk
President and Chief Executive Officer
Heliostar Metals Limited
Email: charles.funk@heliostarmetals.com
Phone: +1 844-753-0045
Rob Grey
Investor Relations Manager
Heliostar Metals Limited
Email: rob.grey@heliostarmetals.com
Phone: +1 844-753-0045

 

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
This news release includes certain ‘Forward-Looking Statements’ within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and ‘forward-looking information’ under applicable Canadian securities laws. When used in this news release, the words ‘anticipate’, ‘believe’, ‘estimate’, ‘expect’, ‘target’, ‘plan’, ‘forecast’, ‘may’, ‘would’, ‘could’, ‘schedule’ and similar words or expressions, identify forward-looking statements or information. These forward-looking statements or information relate to, among other things: the Company’s goal of becoming a mid-tier producer, the mine performance, production plans and the free cashflow generation from our operating mines, all profits generated from operations to be reinvested directly into our Companies growth and this reinvestment will focus on expanding production and growing resources across our portfolio.

Forward-looking statements and forward-looking information relating to the terms and completion of the Facility, any future mineral production, liquidity, and future exploration plans are based on management’s reasonable assumptions, estimates, expectations, analyses and opinions, which are based on management’s experience and perception of trends, current conditions and expected developments, and other factors that management believes are relevant and reasonable in the circumstances, but which may prove to be incorrect. Assumptions have been made regarding, among other things, the receipt of necessary approvals, price of metals; no escalation in the severity of public health crises or ongoing military conflicts; costs of exploration and development; the estimated costs of development of exploration projects; and the Company’s ability to operate in a safe and effective manner and its ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms.

These statements reflect the Company’s respective current views with respect to future events and are necessarily based upon a number of other assumptions and estimates that, while considered reasonable by management, are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties and contingencies. Many factors, both known and unknown, could cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from the results, performance or achievements that are or may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or forward-looking information and the Company has made assumptions and estimates based on or related to many of these factors. Such factors include, without limitation: precious metals price volatility; risks associated with the conduct of the Company’s mining activities in foreign jurisdictions; regulatory, consent or permitting delays; risks relating to reliance on the Company’s management team and outside contractors; risks regarding exploration and mining activities; the Company’s inability to obtain insurance to cover all risks, on a commercially reasonable basis or at all; currency fluctuations; risks regarding the failure to generate sufficient cash flow from operations; risks relating to project financing and equity issuances; risks and unknowns inherent in all mining projects, including the inaccuracy of reserves and resources, metallurgical recoveries and capital and operating costs of such projects; contests over title to properties, particularly title to undeveloped properties; laws and regulations governing the environment, health and safety; the ability of the communities in which the Company operates to manage and cope with the implications of public health crises; the economic and financial implications of public health crises, ongoing military conflicts and general economic factors to the Company; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or development activities; employee relations, labour unrest or unavailability; the Company’s interactions with surrounding communities; the Company’s ability to successfully integrate acquired assets; the speculative nature of exploration and development, including the risks of diminishing quantities or grades of reserves; stock market volatility; conflicts of interest among certain directors and officers; lack of liquidity for shareholders of the Company; litigation risk; and the factors identified under the caption ‘Risk Factors’ in the Company’s public disclosure documents. Readers are cautioned against attributing undue certainty to forward-looking statements or forward-looking information. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be anticipated, estimated or intended. The Company does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements or forward-looking information to reflect changes in assumptions or changes in circumstances or any other events affecting such statements or information, other than as required by applicable law.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/264693

News Provided by Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Apollo Silver Corp. (‘ Apollo ‘ or the ‘ Company ‘) (TSX.V:APGO, OTCQB:APGOF, Frankfurt:6ZF0) is pleased to announce that, further to the Company’s news release dated October 3, 2024, it intends to proceed with the consolidation (the ‘ Consolidation ‘) of its issued and outstanding common shares (‘ Shares ‘) on the basis of five (5) pre-Consolidation Shares for every one (1) post-Consolidation Share.

Consolidation of the Company Shares should result in a price environment that allows for immediate marginability, the opportunity of greater blue-sky potential in the US and foreign markets, increased sophisticated investor interest and greater opportunity for inclusion in various indexes and/or index funds. In addition, few of the Company’s peer groups are margin eligible, providing the Company another advantage over our peers,’ commented Ross McElroy, President and CEO.

Prior to the Consolidation the Company has 242,585,395 Shares issued and outstanding. Following the Consolidation, the Company will have approximately 48,517,079 Shares issued and outstanding.

No fractional Shares will be issued under the Consolidation. The holdings of any shareholder who would otherwise be entitled to receive a fractional Share as a result of the Consolidation shall be rounded to the nearest whole number and no cash consideration will be paid in respect of fractional Shares. The Consolidation will not affect any shareholder’s percentage ownership in the Company other than by the minimal effect of the aforementioned elimination of fractional Shares, even though such ownership will be represented by a smaller number of Shares. Instead, the Consolidation will reduce proportionately the number of Shares held by all shareholders.

A letter of transmittal will be mailed to registered shareholders providing instructions with respect to exchanging share certificates representing pre-Consolidation Shares for post-Consolidation Shares. Shareholders who hold their Shares in brokerage accounts or in book-entry form are not required to take any action as they will have their holdings electronically adjusted by the Company’s transfer agent or by their brokerage firms, banks, trust or other nominees. In accordance with the Company’s Articles, the Consolidation will not require shareholder approval and was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on October 2, 2024.

The Company will issue a subsequent news release to announce the effective date of the Consolidation once approval has been received from the TSX Venture Exchange (‘ TSXV ‘), as the Consolidation remains subject to regulatory approval.

About Apollo Silver Corp.

Apollo is advancing one of the largest undeveloped primary silver projects in the US. The Calico project hosts a large, bulk minable silver deposit with significant barite credits – a critical mineral essential to the US energy and medical sectors. The Company also holds an option on the Cinco de Mayo Project in Chihuahua, Mexico, which is host to a major carbonate replacement (CRD) deposit that is both high-grade and large tonnage. Led by an experienced and award-winning management team, Apollo is well positioned to advance the assets and deliver value through exploration and development.

Please visit www.apollosilver.com for further information.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Ross McElroy
President and CEO

For further information, please contact:

Email: info@apollosilver.com

Telephone: +1 (604) 428-6128

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

This news release includes ‘forward-looking statements’ and ‘forward-looking information’ within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation. All statements included in this news release, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements including, without limitation the completion of the Consolidation; the receipt of approval for the Consolidation by the TSXV; and the expected benefits of the Share-Consolidation, including potential for a trading price environment that may allow for immediate marginability, an advantage over competition, and greater blue-sky potential in the U.S. and foreign markets, increased interest from sophisticated investors, and the potential for inclusion in various indexes. Forward-looking statements include predictions, projections and forecasts and are often, but not always, identified by the use of words such as ‘anticipate’, ‘believe’, ‘plan’, ‘estimate’, ‘expect’, ‘potential’, ‘target’, ‘budget’ and ‘intend’ and statements that an event or result ‘may’, ‘will’, ‘should’, ‘could’ or ‘might’ occur or be achieved and other similar expressions and includes the negatives thereof.

Forward-looking statements are based on the reasonable assumptions, estimates, analysis, and opinions of the management of the Company made in light of its experience and its perception of trends, current conditions and expected developments, as well as other factors that management of the Company believes to be relevant and reasonable in the circumstances at the date that such statements are made. Forward-looking information is based on reasonable assumptions that have been made by the Company as at the date of such information and is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may have caused actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information, including but not limited to: risks associated with mineral exploration and development; metal and mineral prices; availability of capital; accuracy of the Company’s projections and estimates; realization of mineral resource estimates, interest and exchange rates; competition; stock price fluctuations; availability of drilling equipment and access; actual results of current exploration activities; government regulation; political or economic developments; environmental risks; insurance risks; capital expenditures; operating or technical difficulties in connection with development activities; personnel relations; and changes in Project parameters as plans continue to be refined. Forward-looking statements are based on assumptions management believes to be reasonable, including but not limited to the price of silver, gold and Ba; the demand for silver, gold and Ba; the ability to carry on exploration and development activities; the timely receipt of any required approvals; the ability to obtain qualified personnel, equipment and services in a timely and cost-efficient manner; the ability to operate in a safe, efficient and effective matter; and the regulatory framework regarding environmental matters, and such other assumptions and factors as set out herein. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate and actual results, and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward looking information contained herein, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. The forward-looking information contained herein is presented for the purpose of assisting investors in understanding the Company’s expected financial and operational performance and the Company’s plans and objectives and may not be appropriate for other purposes. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking information, except in accordance with applicable securities laws .

News Provided by GlobeNewswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Ohio State’s 14-7 win against Texas triggered one of the cardinal rules of the US LBM Coaches Poll: When No. 2 beats No. 1, No. 2 becomes No. 1.

What happens after No. 1 is very much up in the air after the first full weekend of the 2025 season, but the Buckeyes likely will assume the top spot after taking the season opener. Look for Big Ten rival Penn State to climb one spot to No. 2 after the Nittany Lions cruised through the opener against Nevada.

Georgia could also take a one-rung move to No. 3, though there will be competition for the third spot from LSU and Miami. The Tigers scored a huge win against Clemson and Miami nailed a late field goal to knock off Notre Dame.

The debate comes after No. 5, centering on where to place Oregon and one-loss teams in the Longhorns and Fighting Irish. Texas could easily slot in at No. 6 and probably no lower than No. 7.

After an eventful weekend, here’s how the top of this week’s Coaches Poll should look:

1. Ohio State (1-0)

The offense will need time to run into form with a new quarterback and coordinator but the defense looks ready to carry the load. The Buckeyes held Arch Manning to 5.7 yards per attempt while the Longhorns converted just 6 of 20 attempts on third and fourth down.

2. Penn State (1-0)

Things will stay easy for Penn State after the 46-11 rout of the Wolf Pack. Next up are Florida International and Villanova before a huge matchup at home against Oregon to end September.

3. LSU (1-0)

Finally taking a season opener under Brian Kelly will give LSU a major shot in the arm heading into this weekend’s tune-up game against Louisiana Tech. Then comes Florida, in the first of four SEC games against teams ranked in the preseason Coaches Poll.

4. Georgia (1-0)

The 45-7 win against Marshall featured a broad overview of how the offense will look with Gunner Stockton at the controls. The Bulldogs’ new starter threw for 190 yards on 7.9 yards per attempt while running the ball 10 times for a team-high 73 yards and a pair of scores. In comparison, Carson Beck run for 187 yards across his two years as the starter.

5. Miami (1-0)

After he injured his arm in last year’s SEC championship game and transferred to Miami in the offseason, Beck’s performance in a 27-24 win against Notre Dame served as a quick reminder of why he’s one of the top quarterbacks in the Bowl Subdivision. He completed 20 of 31 passes for 205 yards and two touchdowns as the Hurricanes replaced Clemson as the team to beat in the ACC.

6. Oregon (1-0)

Look for the Ducks to remain under the radar until meeting Penn State. Not that the rest of the month will be a total breeze: Oregon will take on Oklahoma State, Northwestern and Oregon State before that faceoff with the Nittany Lions.

7. Texas (0-1)

A major thud in Columbus has opened the door to criticism of Manning, his surrounding personnel, the general state of the offense and the Longhorns’ overall ability to weather an SEC slate that includes Florida, Oklahoma, Georgia and Texas A&M.

8. Notre Dame (0-1)

The loss to Miami isn’t too painful in the big picture given how Notre Dame will be a prime at-large candidate even with two regular-season defeats. And the Irish have to like what they saw from young quarterback CJ Carr, who had 237 yards of total offense and two fourth-quarter touchdowns to nearly pull out the win.

9. Arizona State (1-0)

An easy win against Northern Arizona leads into Saturday’s matchup with Mississippi State. While the Bulldogs are the worst team in the SEC, the cross-conference game gives ASU a nice shot at making a national statement.

10. Clemson (0-1)

This fall might end at No. 9. For voters, the disappointing loss to LSU could feed into the perception of Clemson as a program still struggling to put things together despite last year’s late charge to the ACC crown. If coaches are really cynical about the Tigers’ state of affairs, South Carolina is a contender for this spot after beating Virginia Tech.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • Florida State quarterback Thomas Castellanos backed up his preseason trash talk, leading the Seminoles to an upset victory over Alabama.
  • Lee Corso correctly predicted the outcomes of three marquee games in his final appearance on ‘College GameDay.’
  • Preseason hype proved to be misleading, as highly touted teams like Alabama and Texas struggled in Week 1.

Everyone knows talking trash can get you in some hot water. Not only does it cause a stir, but failing to back it up could lead to plenty of criticism.

But turning that trash talk from a prediction to a spoiler? That’s some legendary stuff.

It only took one game for Thomas Castellanos to cement himself in Florida State lore. He couldn’t be stopped by Alabama in the 31-17 upset the Seminoles quarterback said would happen two months ago.

There was a collective groan when Castellanos declared Alabama didn’t ‘have Nick Saban to save them’ and ‘I just don’t see them stopping me.” It was bulletin board material for the Crimson Tide. Even more, Castellanos doubled-down on his words. You wouldn’t blame anyone for expecting a blowout Alabama win and Castellanos to become the meme of the season.

Instead, Castellanos proved Alabama needed Saban to stop him from running for a game-high 78 yards and a touchdown along with 152 yards in the air on just 14 attempts, leading a physical domination over a supposed College Football Playoff contender.

It took guts for Castellanos to back up his trash talk, and he leads the best and worst things we saw in Week 1 of the 2025 season.

Best: Lee Corso goes out with a bang

College football fans rejoiced their beloved game was back, but they also poured love to the retirement of Lee Corso after 38 memorable years on ‘College GameDay.’ There’s no debating his contributions to the sport, and while he has given us several iconic moments, it was clear Corso was reaching the end of his remarkable career.

But he left proving he still got it.

It’s not often greats end their careers with such a high note, but in his final act, Corso reminded everyone he knows ball.

Worst: Preseason hype

It’s practically a guarantee a team with preseason hype will get smacked by reality in Week 1. It’s just a matter of who.

In 2025, that belongs to Arch Manning and Alabama. The Heisman Trophy favorite, Manning struggled against Ohio State with just 38 passing yards through three quarters. He finished with 170 yards in the air but it wasn’t a performance that looked like the next great college quarterback.

Meanwhile, Alabama was believed to be ready to return to the title picture after an up-and-down first year with Kalen DeBoer. Instead, the Crimson Tide didn’t look anything close to a contender, beaten by Florida State team coming off a two-win season. Now, people in Tuscaloosa are already wondering if Saban’s successor was a mistake.

Reality hits you fast.

Best: Tulane makes New Orleans proud

Tulane wanted to recognize the 20th anniversary of Hurricane Katrina by wearing blank green helmets and white jerseys in its home opener, what the team wore in its first game after the devastating hurricane. However, they weren’t able to because Northwestern declined the decision as the road team.

What was supposed to be a nice tribute to their city was denied. The Green Wave responded by dismantling the Wildcats, 23-3, and coach Jon Sumrall made sure everyone knew it fueled the dominant win.

‘When you disrespect the city of New Orleans, that’s what’s going to happen to you. You’re going to run into a team like this that had a chip on their shoulder,’ he said. ‘We might’ve used that for a little motivation to represent the city.’

‘Don’t disrespect the City of New Orleans, ever.’

Worst: Poorly planned ‘neutral’ games

Neutral site games to start the season are pretty good ideas. They provide excitement for teams and fans to travel to fun cities and stadiums while increasing national exposure.

Unless it’s pretty much a road game.

Cincinnati and Syracuse signed themselves up for complete hostility; the Bearcats had to deal with Nebraska fans taking over Arrowhead Stadium − even though it was a ‘home’ game − and the Orange were taken over by Tennessee orange in Atlanta.

Essentially playing true road games, Cincinnati and Syracuse came up short and will probably rethink their future non-conference scheduling strategy.

Worst: The Oregon Duck loses his head

Even the greats have to shake off the offseason rust.

The Oregon Duck is one of the best mascots in sports, but his 2025 debut was rocky. Its head fell off as it made its way onto the field, resulting in a full sprint back to the locker room to protect the identity. A really tough moment from the person in the costume.

It could’ve been a bad omen, but luckily, the football team wasn’t affected with a 59-13 win over Montana State.

Best: Kent State snaps losing streak

The nation’s longest losing streak is no more as Kent State snapped its run of 21 consecutive defeats with a win against Merrimack.

It’s easy to forget how miserable the Golden Flashes have been. The last time they won a game was Sept. 16, 2023. That’s 714 days of waiting. Since Kent State’s last victory, Oregon has won a nation-high 23 games.

The cobwebs of the victory bell finally got to be shaken off. Enjoy it Kent State.

Sure it was a win over an Championship Subdivision team, but not every FBS team can say they won their game against one.

Worst: Losing to FCS teams

Case in point.

Army and Middle Tennessee State, congratulations on paying for a loss. The Black Knights were the first FBS team in 2025 to lose to an FCS team in Tarleton State. A missed field goal stopped them from winning in regulation, and another failed kick doomed them in overtime for a 30-27 loss. Army paid the Texans $250,000 for the game, and it doesn’t look like a great use of government funds.

Middle Tennessee suffered a worse fate. Austin Peay jumped out to a 21-0 lead over the Blue Raiders and won 34-14 for its first win over an FBS team since 1987. It hasn’t been revealed how much Middle Tennessee paid, but getting completing outplayed already cost too much.

At least Kansas State avoided being on this list, barely getting past North Dakota in a game it paid $475,000 for.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Los Angeles Rams expect Matthew Stafford to start at quarterback in Week 1 against the Houston Texans, coach Sean McVay told reporters Monday.

‘He’ll be good,’ McVay said when asked about Stafford’s status for the week ahead.

McVay also said he expects Stafford to participate in the full week of practice leading up to Sunday’s game.

The 39-year-old coach did not say whether he anticipated Stafford would be a limited or full participant in the practice sessions.

Stafford, 37, missed the first few weeks of Rams training camp while dealing with an aggravated disc in his back. He was initially expected to return to practice on Monday, Aug. 11, but he didn’t feel good enough to throw. That fueled speculation he could end up sidelined early in the 2025 NFL season.

Stafford eventually returned to practice a week later on Aug. 18, quelling concerns about his Week 1 status.

McVay’s announcement positions Stafford to make his 17th consecutive Week 1 start across 12 years with the Detroit Lions and five with the Rams.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • Carson Beck won’t regret transferring from Georgia to Miami. That doesn’t mean Gunner Stockton won’t answer Georgia’s problems.
  • Kalen DeBoer faces trouble at Alabama, but not the hot seat. Not yet, at least
  • For Notre Dame, it all comes down to Texas A&M.

It’s gotten so bad in Alabama in Kalen DeBoer’s quest to replace Nick Saban, fans are musing about the availability of Georgia Tech’s coach, and talk-show host Paul Finebaum is tweeting his show’s phone number, lest dejected fans require an on-air therapy session.

Is Georgia Tech’s coach also available to call plays for Notre Dame? The Irish are reeling after their play-callers were out to lunch in the season opener, while Carson Beck dined on leprechaun.

Clemson fought for the driver’s seat on the struggle bus, but the Tigers failed that task, too. Alabama already called dibs. At Texas, they’re left rationalizing that it’s only Week 1.

Here are four lingering questions after college football’s first full weekend:

Will Georgia regret losing Carson Beck?

Beck won’t regret transferring from Georgia to Miami. He wisely left Kirby Smart behind in favor of Miami’s superior wide receivers. Dependable big fellas and reliable pass catchers are a quarterback’s best friends.

For Beck, it became notable that Miami receivers didn’t drop a pass, and CJ Daniels turned a would-be interception into a touchdown with the greatest grab you’ll see all season. Notre Dame sacked Beck just once. Allow Beck comfort in the pocket, and he’ll use his big-league arm to dissect a defense.

Beck’s performance in a 27-24 takedown of the Irish became proof positive of the power in a change of scenery – and the value in wide receivers. Georgia led all Power Four teams in dropped passes last season.

Beck missed his Brock Bowers security blanket in 2024, but, more than that, he missed having a target whom he could throw to without worrying the ball would bounce off their hands. Beck compounded the problem by forcing passes that resulted in interceptions. It’s revisionist history to act like Beck wasn’t part of Georgia’s underachievement last year. His slump played a part, but he was far from the only (or biggest) flaw.

Smart, realizing he had a problem, upgraded Georgia’s wide receivers in the offseason, but the collection in Athens still isn’t as good as what Beck will have at Miami.

So, Beck will enjoy his new digs, but will Georgia regret losing Beck? That’s tougher to answer.

Gunner Stockton, Beck’s successor, lacks Beck’s howitzer, but he’s no noodle-armed quarterback. He’s a veteran blue-chipper. Stockton fared well in Georgia’s smashing of Marshall, but there’s little to glean from playing what Smart aptly described as an “overmatched” opponent.

Still, I couldn’t help but notice Stockton score on a pair of read-option runs.

Georgia’s offense never looked better than it did while possessing dual-threat veteran Stetson Bennett IV in its 2022 national championship season. Bennett could improvise and extend plays with his legs. He became the epitome of a gamer. Georgia rallied around him.

Stockton seems popular inside Georgia’s locker room, and teams that lack receivers like Miami’s Daniels and Malachi Toney benefit from mobile quarterbacks. Stockton’s running abilities give Georgia a callback to Bennett.

Is Kalen DeBoer on the hot seat?

No. Not yet, anyway. He’s on an uncomfortable seat. Rightfully so. Alabama’s defense lacked none of its vintage ferocity in a season-opening loss to Florida State. You could’ve made a similar assessment after last year’s losses to Vanderbilt, Tennessee and Oklahoma.

The drop-off of Alabama’s defense didn’t begin under DeBoer. That started at the end of the Nick Saban era, but the problem’s worsened.

DeBoer is protected by a whopper buyout, and the fact that athletic departments now need money to pay athletes. He’s also got five-star freshman quarterback Keelon Russell waiting in reserve. He might want to consider tapping that reserve sooner than later.

For now, DeBoer’s facing heat, but not the firing squad. Ask me again if Alabama loses to Louisiana-Monroe.

Should Texas or Clemson be more concerned?

Texas. Why? Because Clemson’s game against LSU equated to a free swing.

Georgia smashed Clemson last season, and the Tigers still made the College Football Playoff. Clemson’s neatest path to the playoff remains winning the ACC, though Florida State, Miami, Louisville and SMU will make that an obstructed path.

Clemson’s vaunted defensive line will shine within the ACC.

For Texas, the Horseshoe won’t be the only difficult environment it faces. Two of its toughest remaining games, against Georgia and Florida, will be on the road, in addition to a neutral-site game against Oklahoma and home game against Texas A&M. Arch Manning has yet to prove he can diffuse landmines such as those.

It’s not time to panic about Manning or this Texas offense, but it’s also not irrational to be concerned after a clunker in Columbus.

Does Notre Dame’s season hinge on Week 2?

Consider the Irish’s next game – they’ll host Texas A&M – a matchup with win-or-bust consequences.

Notre Dame scheduled its toughest games in the season’s first two weeks, and it’s reasonable to think the Irish need to go 1-1 in those games to build a playoff résumé.

Pinning at-large playoff credentials to opponents like Purdue, Stanford and Syracuse is a bootless errand. The Irish need to beat the Aggies to avoid falling from the playoff picture by Week 3.

The good news for Notre Dame? CJ Carr showed promise against Miami in his first career start. The game plan became a problem. That can be addressed. Start by remembering the existence of Jeremiyah Love.

Texas A&M’s run defense showed vulnerability in a Week 1 triumph against Texas-San Antonio.

Beating Texas A&M buoyed Notre Dame a year ago, even after the Irish lost to Northern Illinois. A year later, the Aggies could sink Notre Dame.

Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network’s senior national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@gannett.com and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

NEW YORK — The last time Coco Gauff and Naomi Osaka met at the US Open six years ago, the emotions for a then-15-year-old Gauff were overwhelming, with her bursting into tears at the end of the 6-3, 6-0 third-round defeat.

It was Gauff’s first appearance on the big stage of Arthur Ashe Stadium, but on Monday, a resurgent Osaka was the one fighting back tears. The No. 23 seed again got the best of her fellow former US Open champion and someone she affectionately calls her ‘little sister,’ advancing to the quarterfinals with a rather efficient 6-3, 6-2 victory in front of a packed Arthur Ashe Stadium on Sept. 1, 2025.

Gauff’s issues from earlier matches in the tournament reared their ugly head again, with a flurry of unforced errors and double faults, putting her down early as Osaka, a two-time winner at Flushing Meadows, sat back, waited patiently to capitalize on every mistake, and worked her forehand to win points along the baseline.

The problems started early, as Gauff, the No. 3 seed, was broken on her initial serve. Then, serving to stay in the first set, she started off with an ace but faltered, double-faulting twice, the last one giving Osaka the set.

Gauff was serving to stay in the match, and held a 40-15 lead, only to suffer another meltdown, and Osaka celebrated her victory when Gauff’s return of her effective forehand return hit the net.

It is the fifth time Osaka has reached a Grand Slam quarterfinal, and she has gone on to win that title each time. She also advanced to the quarterfinals for the first time since the 2021 Australian Open, the last of her four Grand Slam titles.

“I’m a little sensitive and I don’t want to cry, but I had so much fun out here,’ Osaka said in a post-match interview. ‘I was in the stands two months after I gave birth to my daughter, watching Coco. I really wanted an opportunity to come out here and play. This is my favorite court in the world. It means so much to me to be back here. ‘

“I look up to her. The way she conducts herself is really special. To be such an amazing role model at such a young age, it’s a gift. I have all the respect in the world for her.’

Osaka’s quarterfinal opponent will be No. 11 seed Karolína Muchová, a 6-3, 6-7 (0-7), 6-3 winner over No. 27 seed Marta Kostyuk.

USA TODAY had full coverage of the match between Naomi Osaka and Coco Gauff. Scroll below for a recap and highlights:

Osaka seems primed for victory

Two games away from victory, Osaka has played a steady match so far, limiting her mistakes and capitalizing on opportunities when Gauff’s game has gone astray. In the sixth game, Gauff again couldn’t get together and was broken, giving Osaka a 4-2 advantage.

Osaka takes the first set

Naomi Osaka is halfway home, a set away from the quarterfinals, winning the first set 6-3, as Gauff double-faulted and is broken on her service game to stay in the set. Gauff had 14 unforced errors in the set.

Gauff having issues with errors

Naomi Osaka is continuing to put the pressure on Gauff, and continues to be up a break at 4-2; Gauff, at times, is having trouble returning Osaka’s serve, and several rallies have ended up in the net for unforced errors

Osaka takes two-game lead over Gauff

Osaka is in control in the early part of the match, as Gauff was broken on her serve and Osaka powered through with a clean sweep of games, thanks to several enforced errors by the 2023 U.S. Open champion.

Packed house for Gauff vs. Osaka

It is more than 20,000 strong at Arthur Ashe Stadium for the sixth meeting between Coco Gauff and Naomi Osaka. Gauff leads the head-to-head matchup 3-2, including victories in the last two meetings (2022 San Jose and 2024 Beijing).

Osaka’s first win over Gauff came at the 2019 US Open in the third round, with Gauff winning the next time they met at a Grand Slam, a third-round victory at the 2020 Australian Open.

What time is Gauff vs Osaka from the US Open?

The Round of 16 match between No. 3 seed Coco Gauff and No. 23 seed Naomi Osaka is the second match in Arthur Ashe Stadium on Monday, Sept. 1. It will take place immediately following the match between No. 25 seed Felix Auger-Aliassime and No. 15 seed Andrey Rublev, which is scheduled to begin at 11:30 a.m. ET.

Gauff and Osaka are likely to begin play in the early afternoon on Monday.

How to watch Osaka vs. Gauff

No. 23 seed Naomi Osaka will face No. 3 seed Coco Gauff in a U.S. Open women’s singles fourth-round matchup on Monday, Sept. 1, on ESPN.

  • Date: Monday, Sept. 1
  • Time: TBD, early afternoon ET
  • TV channel: ESPN
  • Streaming: ESPN+ and Fubo (free trial)

Watch the US Open with Fubo

How to watch all the 2025 US Open action: Dates, TV, streaming

  • Dates: Sunday, Aug. 24-Sunday, Sept. 7
  • Location: USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center (New York)
  • TV channels: ABC, ESPN, ESPN2, ESPN Deportes (Spanish language)
  • Streaming: ESPN+ and Fubo (free trial)
This post appeared first on USA TODAY