Author

admin

Browsing

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO UNITED STATES NEWS WIRE SERVICES OR FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES.

Lahontan Gold Corp. (TSXV:LG,OTC:LGCXF, OTCQB:LGCXF, FSE:Y2F) (the ‘Company’ or ‘Lahontan’) is pleased to announce that it intends to complete a non-brokered private placement of up to 24,390,244 units (each, a ‘Unit’) in the capital of the Company at a price of Cdn $0.41 per Unit for gross proceeds of up to Cdn $10,000,000 (the ‘Offering’).

Each Unit shall be comprised of one common share (each, a ‘Common Share‘) in the capital of the Company and one-half of one whole Common Share purchase warrant (each whole warrant, a ‘Warrant‘). Each Warrant entitles the holder thereof to purchase one Common Share at a price of Cdn $0.60 per Common Share for a period of two (2) years from the date of issuance, provided, however, that should the closing price at which the Common Shares trade on the TSX Venture Exchange (or any such other stock exchange in Canada as the Common Shares may trade at the applicable time) is equal to or exceeds Cdn $1.00 for ten (10) consecutive trading days at any time following the date that is four months and one day after the date of issuance, the Company may accelerate the Warrant Term (the ‘Reduced Warrant Term‘) such that the Warrants shall expire on the date which is 30 business days following the date a press release is issued by the Company announcing the Reduced Warrant Term.

Gross proceeds raised from the Offering will be used for general working capital purposes and for exploration at the Company’s Santa Fe Mine and West Santa Fe Projects.

All securities issued in connection with the Offering will be subject to a hold period of four months plus a day from the date of issuance and the resale rules of applicable securities legislation. Subject to compliance with applicable regulatory requirements, all securities to be issued pursuant to the Offering in jurisdictions outside of Canada and the United States pursuant to Ontario Securities Commission Rule 72-503 – Distributions Outside Canada will not be subject to any statutory hold period under applicable Canadian securities laws. The closing of the Offering is subject to certain conditions including, but not limited to, the receipt of all necessary regulatory and other approvals, including the approval of the TSX Venture Exchange.

This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the securities in the United States. The securities have not been and will not be registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ‘U.S. Securities Act‘) or any state securities laws and may not be offered or sold within the United States or to U.S. Persons as defined under applicable United States securities laws unless registered under the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws or an exemption from such registration is available.

About Lahontan Gold Corp.

Lahontan Gold Corp. is a Canadian mine development and mineral exploration company that holds, through its US subsidiaries, four gold and silver exploration properties in the Walker Lane of mining friendly Nevada. Lahontan’s flagship property, the 28.3 km2 Santa Fe Mine project, had past production of 359,202 ounces of gold and 702,067 ounces of silver between 1988 and 1995 from open pit mines utilizing heap-leach processing. The Santa Fe Mine has a Canadian National Instrument 43-101 compliant Indicated Mineral Resource of 1,539,000 oz Au Eq (48,393,000 tonnes grading 0.92 g/t Au and 7.18 g/t Ag, together grading 0.99 g/t Au Eq) and an Inferred Mineral Resource of 411,000 oz Au Eq (16,760,000 grading 0.74 g/t Au and 3.25 g/t Ag, together grading 0.76 g/t Au Eq), all pit constrained (Au Eq is inclusive of recovery, please see Santa Fe Project Technical Report and note below*). The Company plans to continue advancing the Santa Fe Mine project towards production, update the Santa Fe Preliminary Economic Assessment, and drill test its satellite West Santa Fe project during 2025. For more information, please visit our website: www.lahontangoldcorp.com

* Please see the ‘Preliminary Economic Assessment, NI 43-101 Technical Report, Santa Fe Project’, Authors: Kenji Umeno, P. Eng., Thomas Dyer, PE, Kyle Murphy, PE, Trevor Rabb, P. Geo, Darcy Baker, PhD, P. Geo., and John M. Young, SME-RM; Effective Date: December 10, 2024, Report Date: January 24, 2025. The Technical Report is available on the Company’s website and SEDAR+. Mineral resources are reported using a cut-off grade of 0.15 g/t AuEq for oxide resources and 0.60 g/t AuEq for non-oxide resources. AuEq for the purpose of cut-off grade and reporting the Mineral Resources is based on the following assumptions gold price of US$1,950/oz gold, silver price of US$23.50/oz silver, and oxide gold recoveries ranging from 28% to 79%, oxide silver recoveries ranging from 8% to 30%, and non-oxide gold and silver recoveries of 71%. 

Qualified Person

Brian J. Maher, M.Sc., CPG-12342, is a ‘Qualified Person’ as defined under Canadian National Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, and has reviewed and approved the content of this news release in respect of all technical disclosure other than the Mineral Resource Estimate as noted above.‎ Mr. Maher is Vice President-Exploration for Lahontan Gold and has verified the data disclosed in this news release, including the sampling, ‎‎analytical and test data underlying the disclosure.

On behalf of the Board of Directors

Kimberly Ann

Founder, CEO, President, Executive Chair

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT:

Lahontan Gold Corp.

Kimberly Ann
Founder, CEO, President, Executive Chair

Phone: 1-530-414-4400

Email:
Kimberly.ann@lahontangoldcorp.com

Website: www.lahontangoldcorp.com

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements:

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. Except for statements of historical fact, this news release contains certain ‘forward-looking information’ within the meaning of applicable securities law. Forward-looking information is frequently characterized by words such as ‘plan’, ‘expect’, ‘project’, ‘intend’, ‘believe’, ‘anticipate’, ‘estimate’ and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions ‘may’ or ‘will’ occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates at the date the statements are made and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements including, but not limited to delays or uncertainties with regulatory approvals, including that of the TSXV. There are uncertainties inherent in forward-looking information, including factors beyond the Company’s control. The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking information if circumstances or management’s estimates or opinions should change except as required by law. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Additional information identifying risks and uncertainties that could affect financial results is contained in the Company’s filings with Canadian securities regulators, which filings are available at www.sedar.com.

News Provided by GlobeNewswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

(TheNewswire)

 

Vancouver, British Columbia / March 12, 2026 ‑ TheNewswire – Harvest Gold Corporation (TSXV: HVG,OTC:HVGDF) (‘Harvest Gold‘ or the ‘Company‘) is pleased to announce that it has entered into definitive agreements (the ‘Agreements‘) to acquire 24 additional mineral claims covering 1,356 hectares (the ‘Claims‘) from two separate arm’s length prospector groups in the Urban Barry Greenstone Belt of Quebec.

The block of six (6) claims and four (4) claims to the south are underlain by the Kiask River Deformation Zone and, when combined with Harvest Gold’s LaBelle property, provide continuous coverage over approximately 33 kilometres of strike length of favourable geology south of the Wilson intrusion (see Figure 1).


Click Image To View Full Size

Figure 1: Newly Acquired Mineral Claims

With this acquisition, Harvest Gold’s land position in the highly prospective Urban Barry Greenstone Belt now totals 401 mineral claims covering 21,372.81 hectares and over 50 kilometres of strike length of favorable and potentially mineralized structures, strategically located within the Urban Barry Greenstone Belt (See Figure 2).

 

Rick Mark, President and CEO of Harvest Gold, states: ‘This expansion enhances our strategic footprint in the Urban Barry Greenstone Belt. Importantly, it connects Mosseau and LaBelle and now covers the entirety of the Kiask River Deformation Zone. Historical results and surface showings from only a small portion of the now expanded Mosseau property underscore the strong exploration potential across the largely underexplored, 100% owned land package.

 

Strategic Expansion of the Mosseau Project

The Claims acquired by Harvest Gold cover 1,356 hectares in the Urban Barry Greenstone Belt of Quebec. The Claims expand the Company’s Mosseau Project along strike, both to the north and south, incorporating areas of favourable geology with documented historical gold and base metal showings. Historical work documented in the government’s database (SIGEOM) has outlined five (5) additional mineral showings in the north part of the Mosseau property, extending into the Toussaint Deformation Zone and three (3) mineral showings to the south, adjoining the Mosseau and LaBelle properties (Figure 1).

Northern Showings within the Toussaint Deformation Zone include:

  • Domtar 116 (Blueberry): 4.4% Cu, 46.0 g/t Ag, 1.38 g/t Au over 0.18 m (DDH) 

  • Domtar 111 (Beehler Vein): 0.69 g/t Au, 3.09 g/t Ag, 0.22% Cu, 0.23% MoS₂ over 0.61 m (channel sample) and 1.4 g/t Au, 0.86% Cu (grab sample) 

  • Rivière Wilson: 1.0 g/t Au (grab sample) 

  • Verneuil-BV-92-01: 1.23 g/t Au over 0.27 m (DDH) 

  • Verneuil-Serem Est: 1.41 g/t Au over 1.5 m (DDH) 

Southern Showings – Kiask River Deformation Zone

  • Lac Labrie: 47.32 g/t Au over 0.3 m (DDH), 22.3 g/t Au over 0.9 m (DDH), 119.67 g/t Au (float sample) 

  • Labrie 2: 1.65% Zn, 1.11% Pb (grab samples) 

  • Lac Labrie SE: 2.06 g/t Au, 4.46 g/t Ag over 0.61m (DDH) 

The block of six (6) claims and Four (4) claims to the south are underlain by the Kiask River Deformation Zone and, when combined with Harvest Gold’s LaBelle property, provide continuous coverage over approximately 33 kilometres of strike length of favourable geology south of the Wilson intrusion The Audet-Robert claim blocks were purchased from Jean Robert, Les Explorations Carat, 9495-6976 Québec Inc. (the ‘Audet-Robert Vendors‘) and the Gaudreault claim block was purchased from Daniel Gaudreault (the ‘Gaudreault Vendor‘).

Transaction Terms – Audet-Robert Claim Blocks

As consideration for a 100% interest in the Audet-Robert claim blocks, Harvest Gold has agreed to provide the Audet-Robert Vendors with:

  • $60,000 in cash, with $30,000 payable upon receiving TSX Venture Exchange (the Exchange‘) approval to the transaction and $30,000 payable by June 30th, 2026; 

  • 750,000 common shares of the Company (the Shares‘), with one-half (1/2) of the Shares to be issued upon receiving Exchange approval to the transaction and one-half (1/2) of the Shares to be delivered by June 30th, 2026.  The Shares will be subject to a statutory resale restriction period of four months from the date of issuance of the Shares in accordance with Canadian securities laws. 

Transaction Terms – Gaudreault Claim Block

As consideration for a 100% interest in the Gaudreault claim block, Harvest Gold will provide the Gaudreault Vendor with $5,000 in cash.

No finder’s fees are payable in connection with the transactions.

The Agreements remain subject to regulatory approval by the Exchange.

NI 43-101 Disclosure – Historical Data

The historical exploration results referenced in this news release were completed by previous operators and have not been independently verified by Harvest Gold. Although the Company considers the historical work to be relevant and reliable, it has not completed sufficient work to verify these historical results and does not rely on them for the purposes of this disclosure. The historical information is presented solely to provide context for current exploration results and ongoing exploration planning.

The true widths of the reported historical drill and channel sampling intervals have not been determined. Grab samples are selective by nature and may not be representative of the overall mineralization on the Mosseau Project.

 

Qualified Person Statement

All scientific and technical information in this news release has been prepared and approved by Louis Martin, P.Geo., Technical Advisor to the Company and considered a Qualified Person for the purposes of NI 43-101.

Mr. Martin has reviewed and verified the historical assay results reported in SIGEOM and has not identified any errors or omissions during the data verification process. The Company and Mr. Martin are not aware of any factors related to sampling or recovery that could materially affect the accuracy or reliability of the historical data disclosed herein.

About Harvest Gold Corporation

Harvest Gold is focused on exploring for near-surface gold deposits and copper-gold porphyry deposits in politically stable mining jurisdictions. Harvest Gold’s board of directors, management team and technical advisors have collective geological and financing experience exceeding 400 years.

Harvest Gold has three active gold projects focused in the Urban Barry area, totalling 401 claims covering 21,372.81 ha, located approximately 45-70 km west of Gold Fields Limited’s – Windfall Deposit (Figure 2).

Harvest Gold acknowledges that the Mosseau Gold Project straddles the Eeyou Istchee-James Bay and Abitibi territories.  Harvest Gold is committed to developing positive and mutually beneficial relationships based on respect and transparency with local Indigenous communities.

Harvest Gold’s three properties, Mosseau, Urban-Barry and LaBelle, together cover over 50 km of favourable strike along mineralized shear zones.


Click Image To View Full Size

Figure 2: Project Location: Urban-Barry Greenstone Belt

 

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Rick Mark
President and CEO
Harvest Gold Corporation

For more information please contact:

Rick Mark or Jan Urata
@ 604.737.2303 or
info@harvestgoldcorp.com

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Forward Looking Information

This news release includes certain statements that may be deemed ‘forward looking statements’. All statements in this news release, other than statements of historical facts, that address events or developments that Harvest Gold expects to occur, are forward looking statements. Forward looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words ‘expects’, ‘plans’, ‘anticipates’, ‘believes’, ‘intends’, ‘estimates’, ‘projects’, ‘potential’ and similar expressions, or that events or conditions ‘will’, ‘would’, ‘may’, ‘could’ or ‘should’ occur.

Although the Company believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those in forward looking statements include market prices, exploitation and exploration successes, and continued availability of capital and financing, and general economic, market or business conditions. Investors are cautioned that any such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made. Except as required by securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements in the event that management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

Copyright (c) 2026 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.

News Provided by TheNewsWire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

HOUSTON — The cases of wine hadn’t arrived yet Wednesday night, but Vinnie Pasquantino, Aaron Nola and their Team Italy teammates certainly expect their shipment soon from Team USA, with perhaps a few boxes of pizza from Kyle Schwarber, Bryce Harper, Bobby Witt Jr. and the boys.

Pasquantino set a World Baseball Classic record by hitting three homers and Nola suffocated Mexico’s lineup, the duo leading Italy to a 9-1 win over Mexico, securing a quarterfinal berth for Italy while permitting the USA to stay alive and slide into the quarterfinals as the No. 2 seed.

The USA will play Canada, the top seed from Pool A, on Friday night, while Italy, the top seed from Pool B, will host Puerto Rico on Saturday night with both games at Daikin Park in Houston. The winners of the two games will advance to the semifinals in Miami.

While Italy’s attack silenced the heavily pro-Mexico crowd of 39,894 at Daikin Park, the loudest cheers erupted from Team USA’s hotel.

The Americans knew that an Italy victory would automatically assure a quarterfinal berth since they were 3-1 in pool play, with their lone loss coming to Italy (4-0). Yet, the suspense ended early. They basically knew they were in by the fifth inning, once Italy scored their fifth run, giving them a tiebreaker advantage in runs allowed, even if Italy lost.

Just like that, it allowed Team USA manager Mark DeRosa to exhale after he was ridiculed from coast-to-coast, mistakenly believing that the USA had clinched a quarterfinal berth Monday after beating Mexico, 5-3. He erroneously said on MLB Network that the Americans had punched their ticket to the quarterfinals Tuesday night before their game against Italy. He realized his mistake when he arrived at the ballpark, but insisted it didn’t affect his lineup or in-game strategy.

“I just misspoke,’’ DeRosa said repeatedly after the loss to Italy.

No matter, he was still torched, and certainly will be the center of attention Thursday during the workouts for the four quarterfinal teams.

While these quarterfinals in Houston have featured plenty of drama off the field, from two-time Cy Young winner Tarik Skubal’s decision to return to the Detroit Tigers to USA catcher Cal Raleigh’s refusal to shake Mexico outfielder Randy Arozarena’s hand at home plate, lost in the shuffle has been Italy’s brilliant performance.

No one gave the Italians a chance in the pool, which they had never won. It was always USA and Mexico. When USA beat Mexico, the Americans chilled late in the clubhouse for a few hours, thinking Italy would be a push-over the next day, only to lose 8-6. When Mexico played Italy on Wednesday, the biggest question wasn’t whether the Mexicans would win, but would they hold the scoring down to prevent the USA from getting into the quarterfinals in a three-way tie.

Instead, Italy engineered the two greatest victories in Italian baseball history with back-to-back upsets against the two powers.

“This means the world for Italian baseball,’’ said Marco Mazzieri, Italian federation president.

‘The phones are just blowing up,’ he added.

They are now the talk of Italy, with highlights showing on national TV, the prime minister singing their praises, and baseball now on the country’s landscape as an authentic sport.

“Pretty awesome,’’ said Italy second baseman Jon Berti, who’s hit .417 this tournament, and homered Wednesday. “We’re here to win, and we’re here working our butts off to put Italian baseball on the map. Pretty cool to see the prime minister gave us a little bit of a shout-out this morning. …

“I wish my grandfather was still around. He would be loving this. That’s one of the big reasons I wanted to play.’’

It was only fitting that Italy’s biggest hero was Pasquantino, their captain and ringleader of everything from espresso shots to jello shot to wine tastings. Pasquantino, Witt’s teammate with the Kanas City Royals, had been AWOL in Italy’s first three games. He had played fabulous defense, but didn’t have a lone hit, going 0-for-12.

That all changed with one historic evening with a solo homer in the second inning, the sixth inning and the eighth inning.

Yes, it was not only the first three-homer game in WBC history, but perhaps the first three-espresso night in a baseball dugout, too.

“It’s unbelievable how close this group has gotten in such a quick timeframe,’’ Berti said. “We’re all trying to enjoy it as best as we can because we know it won’t last much longer, no matter what. It’s a short tournament, unfortunately. We wish we could play all together for a long time.

“But Vinnie gets a huge credit for that. He set the tone early for us. He’s an awesome leader, very fun to be around and kind of drew everybody in and together.’’

Even when Pasquantino was struggling offensively, his teammates swore you couldn’t tell whether he went 4-for-4 or 0-for-4, showing all of the qualities you’d ever want in a clubhouse leader.

“I would say so,’’ Berti said. “It’s very infectious. We have a lot of younger guys on the team as well with a lot of talent, and it’s kind of allowed them to kind of open up and be themselves a little bit, which might be a little different than some big-league clubhouses, where you need to earn a lot of respect.

“But in this short of a period, it’s good to get everyone on board right away. And he’s done a great job of that, and the young guys have responded, which has been awesome to see.’’

Then, there was Nola, the veteran starter on the Phillies’ staff, and teammates with Schwarber and Harper. He knew if Italy simply won, there would be no need for any tiebreakers or calculators. So he went out and absolutely shoved in his WBC debut, giving up just four hits in five shutout innings with five strikeouts. When he left the game, Italy had a 5-0 lead and cruised the rest of the way.

Team Italy’s starting rotation was relentless in its four games in pool play. It produced a 1.00 ERA, yielding 10 hits and two runs in 18 innings with 20 strikeouts, and a .175 batting average.

Italy’s renaissance has reached such a crescendo that the entire day was dedicated to Italian baseball, with news even spreading in the parliament.

“That means we are making noise,’’ Italy manager Francisco Cervelli said, “and noise in a positive way. If we win this tournament, it will help the national (soccer) team. And I say the national team is a religion. But the religion, probably before the 1900s, was not a religion.

“So probably this is the start of a new religion, baseball in Italy. I don’t know how we can do it, but I think we make it happen. It’s a good start. And I’m glad in Italy a lot of people are talking about baseball.’’

Follow Nightengale on X: @BNightengale

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Golden State Warriors were holding on to the eighth seed in the NBA Western Conference standings, but then guard Stephen Curry went down with a right knee injury that has kept him out 15 games and counting.

The Warriors have lost 10 of those 15 games, including a 130-124 overtime loss to the Chicago Bulls on March 10, to fall to the ninth spot in the Western Conference with a 32-33 record, resting 1 game behind the Los Angeles Clippers (33-32), who sit at the No. 8 spot.

Golden State has -175 odds of missing the 2026 NBA playoffs, as of March 11, according to BetMGM. The betting site has the Warriors at +140 to make the playoffs.

With 17 games remaining in the regular season, the Warriors will be without Curry at least an additional five games, the team announced Wednesday, due to patella-femoral pain syndrome and bone bruising in his right knee.

Curry was re-evaluated and seems to be making good progress.

‘He has been working out individually on the court in recent days and those workouts, based on his continued progress, will continue to intensify,’ the team said in a statement.

Curry is expected to be re-evaluated in 10 days. He last played Jan. 30 against the Detroit Pistons. Curry leads the team with 27.2 points per game.

Warriors postseason hopes

The Warriors still have a 27.4% chance to make the playoffs, according to ESPN’s 2025-26 Playoffs NBA Power Index.

The Warriors face the Minnesota Timberwolves on Friday, March 13. Minnesota is currently 40-26, the No. 6 seed in the Western Conference.

The Warriors then go on a six-game road trip to take on the New York Knicks, Washington Wizards, Boston Celtics, Detroit Pistons, Atlanta Hawks and Dallas Mavericks. The Knicks, Celtics and Pistons are solid playoff-contending teams, holding the top three seeds in the East. The Hawks are currently at the No. 9-spot with a 34-31 record.

Golden State returns home for a pair of games against the Brooklyn Nets on March 25 and Wizards on March 27. Curry could theoretically return against the Nets following his re-evaluation. Neither of those East Coast teams are in the playoff hunt.

In the final month of the season, the Warriors will play five teams contending for the postseason. They start a five-game homestand against the San Antonio Spurs on April 1, then the next day, they host the Cleveland Cavaliers.

The Houston Rockets come to town on April 5, while the Sacramento Kings visit the Bay Area on April 7. The Warriors’ final regular-season meeting with the Lakers is on April 9. Golden State finishes the regular season on the road against Sacramento on April 10 and the Clippers on April 12.

The Warriors have to remain between the No. 7 and No. 10 seeds to be eligible for the 2026 NBA Play-In Tournament, which will take place from April 14 to 17.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Clark was electric in her debut, tallying a double-double with 17 points and 12 assists in 19 minutes of action. Her first points in eight months came with 1 minute, 22 seconds remaining in the first quarter. The Indiana Fever guard sank a triple to get on the board.

“Different than a WNBA game, but for myself, it’s a nice way to ease back into it, and I felt like I was effective when I was out there,’ Clark said. ‘But more than anything, just makes me happy that I’m super sweaty right now and I got to play.”

Newcomers Paige Bueckers, Angel Reese, Rae Burrell, Monique Billings and Kiki Iriafen also had solid debuts in their first action as members of the Team USA senior Team. Bueckers finished with nine points, four rebounds, three assists and a steal in 14 minutes of action. Reese added six points, eight rebounds and an assist during 17 minutes of play.

Clark & Co. were part of a much larger dominant showing from the U.S., which included four players in double figures. Rhyne Howard led the way with a staggering six triples on Wednesday, finishing with 21 points, five rebounds, two assists and a steal. The U.S. completed its matchup against Senegal, shooting 50% from the field and 54% from deep.

‘The ball is always going to find the right shot,’ Howard said. ‘Us being able to come out and, not having that much time with each other, and be able to move it around, it was good.

‘I hit shots, they kept finding me, shooters shot.

Caitlin Clark final stats

Clark had a double-double is her first game since July 15. She played 19 minutes. Not too shabby for someone trying to shake the rust off.

Caitlin Clark notches a double-double against Senegal

Of course, Caitlin Clark has a double-double against Senegal. Of course, she does. At the 3:58 mark of the fourth quarter, Clark splashed a triple to get up to 11 points and 12 rebounds.

Rae Burrell makes Team USA women’s basketball debut

Burell was the last newcomer of Team USA to take the court against Senegal, but she came in and immediately made an impact. Burrell checked in at the start of the fourth quarter, and at the 8:38 mark, she found Kiki Iriafen for an easy assist and score right under the basket. At the 5:16 mark, she scored her first points.

Third quarter: USA 82, Senegal 36

The U.S. has a comfortable 46-point lead at the end of three quarters as it shoots over 60% from the field. Every player who has played has scored. Rhyne Howard leads the field with 18 points, including five 3-pointers, and Kahleah Copper and Monique Billings added 10 points. Caitlin Clark has 12 assists to go along with her eight points.

Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese team up for quick points

Caitlin Clark is making light work of Senegal as she found Angel Reese for an easy two points at the 3:32 mark of the third quarter. The assist was Clark’s ninth of the day.

Senegal coach ejected from the match versus Team USA

Senegal coach Cheikh Sarr was not very happy over what he felt was a non-call on USA’s Rhyne Howard after she made contact with Victorine Thiaw during a steal. At the 7:13 mark of the third, Sarr seemingly said something animated to nearby officials, warranting back-to-back technical fouls on the coach and an ejection.

Paige Bueckers, Angel Reese and more make Team USA debuts

On Wednesday, newcomers Paige Bueckers, Angel Reese, Caitlin Clark, Monique Billings and Kiki Iriafen had all logged minutes by halftime. Rae Burrell, who is also making her debut, was still awaiting action at the break.

Here’s how the newbies of Team USA fared in early action against Senegal:

  • Caitlin Clark (10:23) – 8 points, 8 assists
  • Monique Billings (10:23) – 6 points, 2 rebounds
  • Kiki Iriafen (10:23) – 2 points, 3 rebounds, 1 steal
  • Angel Reese (9:37) – 2 points, 4 rebounds
  • Pauge Bucekers (5:04) – 2 points, 2 rebounds

Halftime: USA 59, Senegal 19

The U.S. women are overwhelming Senegal in all aspects and hold a commanding 59-19 lead at the half. Clark came off the bench to record 8 points and 8 assists before the break, while Rhyne Howard leads all scorers with 15 points. With USA seemingly able to dictate whatever it wants, Clark efficiently facilitated, drawing praise from the commentators for her connection with Howard.

First quarter: USA 28, Senegal 11

After one quarter of play, it’s the USA out in front as the team made a huge push with contributions from Kahleah Copper, Chelsea Gray, Caitlin Clark and Jackie Young.

Caitlin Clark’s debut shot for Team USA is a 3-pointer

At the 1:22 mark of the first quarter, Caitlin Clark drained her first points in a Team USA uniform. Unsurprisingly, it was a 3-pointer, which bounced on the rim and in. It was Clark’s first points since July of last year.

Caitlin Clark checks in for Team USA

At the 5:16 mark of the first quarter, Caitlin Clark made her Team USA Basketball debut. Clark checked in with Kelsey Plum, Rhyne Howard, Kiki Iriafen, and Monique Billings. She immediately passed the ball to Billings for an assist and score, adding to the U.S.’ lead.

Team USA got out to an 11-1 run against Senegal

The U.S. women’s basketball team is off to a hot start on Tuesday. At the 5:27 mark of the first quarter, it’s 13-1, Team USA, over Senegal. Kahleah Copper leads all scorers with six points.

Caitlin Clark is coming off the bench for Team USA

As expected, Caitlin Clark did not start in her Team USA debut.

Here’s who Team USA started for its matchup against Senegal:

  • 7 Kahleah Copper | G 6-0
  • 8 Cheslea Gray | G 5-10
  • 6 Dearica Hamby | F 6-0
  • 9 Angel Reese | F 6-2
  • 13 Jackie Young |G 6-0

It’s almost time for Caitlin Clark to make her Team USA debut

Here’s Indiana Fever star Caitlin Clark flashing a peace sign as she warms up for Wednesday’s matchup against Senegal.

Team USA is ready to play

Team USA Women’s basketball has arrived to play its matchup against Senegal at the Coliseo de Puerto Rico Jose Miguel Agrelot.

How much will Caitlin Clark play for Team USA?

After not playing basketball for eight months, how much will Caitlin Clark play with Team USA?

Realistically, fans shouldn’t expect Clark to play big minutes as part of Team USA’s FIBA World Cup Qualifying roster. USA Basketball coach Kara Lawson and her staff will figure out which lineups work best. Additionally, two other point guards, veteran Chelsea Gray and fellow newcomer Paige Bueckers, are on the roster and will also see minutes.

“This is a different stage,” Clark said. “You’re not going to come out here and be the star player. That’s not how it’s going to be for USA Basketball. You’re going to find a way to help the team win. You’re going to find a way to compete to the best of your ability.”

How to watch Team USA: Schedule

All times Eastern

Team USA Women’s World Cup Qualifying 2026 – Team Roster

Below are the players selected to represent the U.S. at the upcoming FIBA Women’s World Cup qualifying tournament in San Juan, Puerto Rico. 

  • Monique Billings
  • Paige Bueckers
  • Rae Burrell
  • Caitlin Clark
  • Kahleah Copper
  • Chelsea Gray
  • Dearica Hamby
  • Rhyne Howard
  • Kiki Iriafen
  • Kelsey Plum
  • Angel Reese
  • Jackie Young

Get IndyStar’s Indiana Fever and Caitlin Clark coverage sent directly to your inbox with our Caitlin Clark Fever newsletter.

What time is Team USA women’s basketball vs Senegal?

The Team USA women’s basketball game is at 5 p.m. ET on Wednesday, March 11, in San Juan, Puerto Rico.

Team USA women’s basketball vs Senegal: TV/streaming

  • Date: Wednesday, March 11
  • Time: 5 p.m. ET (2 p.m. PT)
  • TV: TNT/truTV
  • Stream: Sling TV
This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Caitlin Clark cooked in her first game in eight months.

Clark had 17 points and 12 assists in 19 minutes of action on Wednesday. She scored her first bucket with 1 minute, 22 seconds remaining in the first quarter. The Indiana Fever guard, of course, hit a 3.

“Different than a WNBA game, but for myself, it’s a nice way to ease back into it, and I felt like I was effective when I was out there,’ Clark said. ‘But more than anything, just makes me happy that I’m super sweaty right now and I got to play.”

Newcomers Paige Bueckers and Angel Reese also saw their first action as members of the U.S. senior team. Bueckers finished with nine points, four rebounds, three assists and a steal in 14 minutes. Reese added six points, eight rebounds and an assist in 17 minutes.

What time is Team USA women’s basketball vs Puerto Rico?

The Team USA women’s basketball game is at 8 p.m. ET on Thursday, March 12, in San Juan, Puerto Rico.

Team USA women’s basketball vs Puerto Rico | TV/streaming

  • Date: Thursday, March 12
  • Time: 8 p.m. ET (5 p.m. PT)
  • TV: TNT/truTV
  • Stream: Sling TV, HBO Max

How to watch Team USA: Schedule

All times Eastern

Team USA Women’s World Cup Qualifying 2026 – Team Roster

Below are the players selected to represent the USA at the upcoming FIBA Women’s World Cup qualifying tournament in San Juan, Puerto Rico. 

  • Monique Billings
  • Paige Bueckers
  • Rae Burrell
  • Caitlin Clark
  • Kahleah Copper
  • Chelsea Gray
  • Dearica Hamby
  • Rhyne Howard
  • Kiki Iriafen
  • Kelsey Plum
  • Angel Reese
  • Jackie Young
This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The 2026 Ivy League women’s basketball tournament begins Friday.

Four teams will vie for the conference title beginning Friday, March 13 at Newman Arena in Ithaca, New York, on the Cornell University campus.

Princeton, which has gotten the Ivy League’s automatic bid in five of the past eight seasons, is the No. 1 seed. The Tigers have a 24-3 overall record; they’re 12-2 in the conference. They are joined in the tournament by Columbia, Harvard and Brown.

Here’s everything you need to know about the Ivy League tournament:

When is the Ivy League tournament scheduled?

The 2026 Ivy League women’s basketball tournament begins Friday, March 13 and runs through Saturday, March 14, at Newman Arena in Ithaca, New York, on the Cornell University campus. Play begins at 4:30 p.m. ET Friday for the semifinals.

The Ivy League championship game is scheduled for 5:30 p.m. ET on Saturday, March 14.

How to watch women’s Ivy League tournament

The Ivy League semifinals can be streamed on ESPN+. The championship will be broadcast on ESPNU.

2026 Ivy League women’s basketball tournament bracket

Ivy League tournament schedule, bracket, scores

The 2026 Ivy League women’s basketball tournament unfolds over two days during March, with all games played at Newman Arena in Ithaca, New York, on the Cornell University campus.

Friday, March 13

Semifinals

No. 1 Princeton vs. No. 4 Brown, 4:30 p.m. ET (ESPN+)No. 2 Columbia vs. No. 3 Harvard, 7:30 p.m. ET (ESPN+)

Saturday, March 14

Championship

Semifinal winners, 5:30 p.m. ET, ESPNU

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Investor Insight

With a strong asset foundation, C$8 million in cash, and an experienced technical team, Prince Silver is well-positioned to capitalize on the current macro tailwinds in the silver and manganese markets. The project has a US Critical Minerals advantage, hosting silver, zinc, lead, and manganese, in addition to gold.

Overview

Prince Silver (CSE:PRNC,OTCQB:PRNCF) is a Vancouver-based exploration company focused on unlocking value at the Prince silver project in southeastern Nevada.

In July 2025, the company completed a transformational acquisition of Stampede Metals Corporation and subsequently rebranded from Hawthorn Resources to Prince Silver Corp.

The flagship asset is a district-scale, past-producing silver-gold-zinc-manganese carbonate replacement system, historically mined through the early to mid-1900s. The immediate objective is to validate and expand upon the 129 historic drill holes (over 16,600 meters) to convert the exploration target into a maiden NI 43-101 mineral resource, targeted for the fourth quarter of 2026.

Company Highlights

  • Flagship Project: 100 percent ownership of the historic Prince silver mine in Lincoln County, Nevada, an open, near-surface silver-gold-zinc carbonate replacement deposit. It has an exploration target of 23 to 45 million tons, with strong historic grades.
  • Fully Funded Drilling Program Underway: A 9,000-meter reverse-circulation drill program is now underway with a steady stream of assay results expected from January to May 2026. This follows an recent funding raise of approximately C$4.75 million in gross proceeds.
  • Clean Corporate Reset: Hawthorn Resources completed the Stampede Metals acquisition and re-listed as Prince Silver Corp. on July 11, 2025.
  • Tight Share Structure: The company has 58.9 million shares issued and outstanding as of February 23, 2026.
  • US Critical Minerals Leverage: The Prince Project hosts critical and strategic minerals on the 2025 USGS list: silver, zinc, lead, and manganese, in addition to gold.
  • Experienced, Hands-on Leadership: President Ralph Shearing, CEO Derek Iwanaka, and new directors Marco Montecinos, Robert Wrixon and Darrell Rader add mine-building, corporate, and capital-markets depth to the leadership team.
  • Expanded Land Position: The land package at the Prince Silver Project has more than doubled, securing over 7 kilometers of prospective strike length along the mineralized fault system.

Key Projects

Prince Silver Project

The Prince silver project is a large-scale, polymetallic Carbonate Replacement Deposit (CRD) located just west of Pioche, a historic mining district in southeastern Nevada. The project hosts a structurally and stratigraphically controlled system of silver-rich mantos, breccias, and fissure veins. Historic underground production between 1912 and 1949 totaled approximately 1.12 million tons (Mt) at average grades of 100 grams per ton (g/t) silver, 4.5 percent zinc, and 10 percent manganese.

Highlights

  • Geological compilation work has defined an exploration target ranging between 23 and 45 Mt, grading approximately 37 to 40 g/t silver, 1.5 percent zinc, and 0.8 percent lead.
  • The fully-funded 9,000 meter drill program is underway with a steady stream of assay results expected from January to May 2026, targeting a maiden NI 43-101 Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) in the fourth quarter of 2026.
  • The company recently expanded its land position, securing over 7 kilometers of prospective strike length along the mineralized fault system.

Stampede Gap Copper-Gold-Molybdenum Project

The Stampede Gap Copper-Gold-Molybdenum Project is a large, early-stage porphyry target in Nevada featuring over 200 claims. Historical geophysics have identified multiple IP-resistivity anomalies, and a single 700 meter drill hole encountered extensive skarn alteration. Its location is only 150 kilometers south of KGHM’s Robinson copper-gold-silver-molybdenum mine. The project presents a deep-seated exploration target that has the hallmarks of a large-scale copper-molybdenum deposit.

Management Team

Derek Iwanaka – Chief Executive Officer and Director

Derek Iwanaka is a mining-sector executive with over 23 years of investor relations, corporate development, and capital markets experience. He has supported more than 20 corporate transactions and helped raise over US$100 million, including one of Canada’s first at-the-market financings. Iwanaka previously held senior roles at BeMetals and First Mining Gold Corp., contributing to strategic acquisitions, project advancement, and significant market-cap growth.

Ralph Shearing – President and Director

Ralph Shearing is a professional geologist and mine developer with over 35 years in mineral exploration development and public company management. Since 1987, Shearing has held senior executive positions with public junior mining and exploration companies, notably Luca Mining, a company he founded and guided through exploration, development, construction, and pre-production of the Tahuehueto mine in Mexico. He currently acts as a Qualified Person for Prince Silver’s technical disclosure.

Rob Scott – Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary

Rob Scott’s professional experience has helped raise over $200 million in equity with past and current executive and board positions with TSXV issuers, including Great Bear Resources, Valore Metals, Riverside Resources, Capitan Silver, and First Helium.

Dr. Robert Wrixon – Independent Director

Robert Wrixon is the managing director of Starboard Global, a Hong Kong-based project incubator and VC firm. Wrixon is a seasoned executive and engineer with over 20 years’ experience across ASX- and LSE-listed mining companies. He holds a PhD in mineral engineering from UC Berkeley and brings deep technical, corporate development, and mergers and acquisitions experience.

Darrell Rader – Independent Director

Darrell Rader is the president and chief executive officer of Minaurum Gold, a silver explorer in Mexico. He has directly raised over $150 million for mineral exploration and development and has strong relationships with institutional investors and bankers. Rader founded Defiance Silver Corp, a silver developer, and previously was the head of corporate development at IMPACT Silver. Rader holds a BBA in Finance from Simon Fraser University.

Marco Montecinos – Independent Director

Marco Montecinos has over 40 years of mineral exploration experience across the Americas, including a key role in the three-million-ounce Marlin Gold discovery, multiple gold discoveries, and current roles as chief president of exploration at Gunpoint Exploration and US Critical Metals, as well as president of Tigren, Inc.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Canada is a premier destination for mineral exploration and mining, but the nation’s exploration-stage companies are still struggling to attract investment dollars.

The country’s appeal is showcased in the Fraser Institute’s most recent Annual Survey of Mining Companies, which tracks the investment attractiveness of global mining jurisdictions. It places the Canadian provinces of Ontario and Saskatchewan among the world’s top mining jurisdictions, behind only Nevada.

The Canadian mining industry “serves as a proxy for the global (mining) industry” as it is home to “the largest concentration of public mineral companies in the world,” with Toronto at “the center of the mining finance universe,” said Douglas Silver, partner and senior advisor at Benwerrin Investment Partners, during his presentation at this year’s Prospectors & Developers Association of Canada (PDAC) convention, held last week.

Jeff Killeen, director of policy and programs for PDAC, shared similar sentiments in his own presentation, telling conference attendees, “Almost 30 percent of every dollar raised somewhere in the world for the (mining) sector comes through the Canadian marketplace: the TSX, the Venture and the CSE.”

Canada’s unique tax incentives crucial for mining investment

Canada owes its leading position in the global mining industry to its large landmass and abundance of natural resources. However, both Silver and Killeen pointed out that the nation’s flow-through share tax incentive — unique to Canada — is also “incredibly critical” to the success of the natioin’s mining sector.

Flow-through shares are a highly specialized financing tool that allow resource companies to transfer eligible exploration and development expenses to investors, who then deduct them from their own taxable income.

Under the Mineral Exploration Tax Credit (METC), funds generated from this type of capital raise must be put into a project within 18 months. There’s also the Critical Mineral Exploration Tax Credit (CMETC), which applies to critical minerals used for batteries and magnets, including rare earths, nickel, uranium, lithium and graphite, among others.

Generational shift shrinking pool of mining investors

Although Canada dominates the global mining finance sector and is teeming with multiple types of mineral deposits, it’s becoming increasingly difficult for the nation’s exploration-stage companies to attract investment dollars.

The tight financial landscape for today’s explorers stems in part from both a complex regulatory system that limits the areas open to mining activity, and a lack of proper infrastructure in the more remote regions of the country. Both of these shortcomings strike at the heart of perceived jurisdictional risk for both retail and institutional investors.

During his presentation, Killeen highlighted a few of the key financing trends affecting access to capital in the mineral industry, noting that last year saw a dramatic uptick in investment in the mining sector.

Where is capital originating from? Most of it was equity raised through private placements, which poses a problem as it represents a very narrow investor base that consists of friends and family of the management team and strategic investors that probably already own shares in the company.

“That just tells us that we’re not broadening the investor base. We’re not pulling in more investors. There’s no more new retail folks coming in investing in shares in Canada. This tells us that we’re in a very risky balance in terms of who actually can fund the sector through the next generation,” he warned the PDAC audience.

“There is a lesser population of retail investors as time goes on. You know that the Boomer generation is going away in terms of an investment pool, and the next generation isn’t necessarily replicating that.”

Silver also views the generational shift in the investment landscape as a problem for raising money in the mining industry. “There’s no question from what I’ve read and heard that the younger generations don’t pick individual stocks. They tend to lean towards ETFs or crypto or other stuff,” he said. “Crypto is definitely competing with mining.”

Gold grabbing all the dollars

Canada’s minerals industry did experience a strong rebound in terms of equity investment in 2025, but it was heavily targeted at producers and developers with large-scale, near-production projects. Gold dominated, but investment also increased in projects associated with critical minerals like lithium, nickel, copper and graphite.

“How much is going to the bottom end, to those sub-$100 million market cap companies, the lion’s share of the junior explorers that are out there? Well, in the Canadian marketplace, only about 10 percent of every dollar raised is getting down to those size of companies,” explained Killeen, highlighting the discrepancy.

In his view, the lack of investment over the past decade is bringing about a decline in grassroots exploration.

Gold is grabbing many mineral investment dollars, not only because its price is surging to unprecedented highs, but also because there’s a faster return on investment compared to other metals. Killeen said that’s due to the fact that gold mining doesn’t require large amounts of infrastructure such as railways and ports.

“In some cases, you don’t need roads. The capital to develop a gold mine might be one-sixth of, one-10th of or one-20th of a copper mine or a zinc mine,” he commented. “So the rate of return for the average investor who’s looking at an exploration stock saying, ‘Could I get money back into this? Could I get value back into this?’ Today that timeframe is much shorter, and the capital to bring it to market is much lower.”

Looking at copper, which is much more capital intensive, Killeen said production is down nearly 30 percent from seven or eight years ago. Reserves are also down, even though rising copper prices have resulted in more resources being upgraded to reserves. Silver agreed with that take — his research shows that the Canadian mining industry is overflowing with gold companies. Of the 1,555 mining companies in Canada in 2024, 42 percent of them were gold-focused firms compared to only 17 percent for copper, the second highest amount.

“So why do we have so many gold companies? I think the answer is pretty obvious to me, which is if you want to build a porphyry copper mine, you’ve got to go raise $5 (billion) or $10 billion,” said Silver. “That’s very difficult in the mining industry, because we just don’t have that much gross capital available to us relative to what some of the other industries have … but you can build a gold mine for a couple hundred million (dollars).’

Despite the massive focus on gold, Killeen and Silver both noted that Canada is actually seeing increasing exploration activity for rare earths, lithium, cobalt, graphite and uranium.

Improving the investment case for Canada’s juniors

Killeen said PDAC and its members are pushing for the Canadian government to make the METC and CMETC permanent to bring more investment into mineral exploration in greenfield regions and making new discoveries.

Last year, flow-through shares generated C$1.6 billion in investment into the sector, according to Silver’s research, or about 76 percent of funding received by mineral exploration companies in Canada.

“When you look at the role of Canadian flow through, it’s so incredibly critical to Canadian mining,” he said. Silver too is advocating for the mining industry and investors to “fight for flow through way more than you do.’

To address infrastructure challenges for bringing critical metals projects into production sooner for a quicker return on investment, Killeen suggested more pension funds investing in Canada and easing government regulations.

“We need them cooperating together with the federal government to develop major infrastructure that doesn’t exist beyond 100 kilometers from the border,” he said.

Killeen noted that “the world is changing” and governments, including Canada’s, are becoming more focused on securing domestic sources of critical minerals. For example, at PDAC, Tim Hodgson, Canada’s minister of energy and natural resources, announced a C$3.6 billion suite of investments targeting the critical minerals sector.

Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Copper prices surged through 2025 and into 2026, placing the red metal firmly back into the spotlight as concerns about a looming global supply shortfall mount among market watchers.

Analysts say the tightening outlook reflects a powerful mix of rising demand — driven by urbanization, the energy transition and the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence infrastructure — against a backdrop of stagnant mine supply.

Speaking at the Benchmark Summit, held in Toronto on March 2, Carlos Piñeiro Cruz, principal copper analyst at Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, outlined the key forces shaping the copper market in the near term, while warning that structural supply challenges could intensify over the coming decade.

Copper supply side increasingly tight

It would be a lie to suggest that the copper supply and demand situation is tenable.

In 2025, mining disruptions led to significant declines in output. Cruz noted that production in Q4 2024 exceeded that of any quarter in 2025; in fact, the sector lost around 1 million metric tons (MT) of output in total.

Much of the reduction was due to unforeseen situations, such as the mudslide at Freeport-McMoRan’s (NYSE:FCX) Grasberg in Indonesia, seismic events at Ivanhoe Mines’ (TSX:IVN,OTCQX:IVPAF) Kamoa-Kakula in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and worker strikes at BHP’s (ASX:BHP,NYSE:BHP,LSE:BHP) Escondida in Chile.

While the operations will eventually recover, the incidents come at a time when the copper market is increasingly tight and is expected to enter into a supply deficit in the coming years.

Cruz is predicting copper production growth of 1.5 percent in 2025, suggesting that the growth rate is behind what is expected from refined copper demand. The majority of the increase will come from mines returning to normal operations, with additional amounts from projects or expansions that began ramping up in 2025.

Cruz stated that pre-disruption growth was originally forecast at around 2 million MT in 2026, but has since been downgraded by around 700,000 MT, with the majority of the reduction coming from Escondida.

“We see that supply coming in this year will be highly skewed towards H2 as mines recover, with a 9 percent increase between Q1 and Q4, with most of this growth coming from South America, Africa and Asia, ex-China,” Cruz said.

From there, he expects growth to stabilize in 2027 at a much higher rate than this year, with Africa to experience a faster growth rate than the overall market. In the long run, Cruz predicts a compound annual growth rate of 0.9 percent between 2025 and 2035, with copper output peaking in 2033 at 27 million MT.

Copper demand drivers to watch

One of the main areas Cruz focused on was the acceleration of demand driven by the energy transition, artificial intelligence and technology. A lot of the new demand is coming from electric vehicles (EVs) — while the amount of copper in each EV is seen declining, demand growth will remain strong as sales increase.

“We do think that copper density on EVs is going to go down substantially. From 2010 to 2035, it’s going to go from 85 kilograms per unit to 64 kilograms per unit. In spite of this, we still think that copper demand from battery EVs and hybrid vehicles will grow substantially from around 2.3 million MT in 2025 to 6 million MT in 2035,” Cruz said.

It’s not just EVs, other technologies like artificial intelligence, data centers and communications are placing additional strains on the electrical infrastructure. Increasing demand for new power lines, electrical generators and energy storage is further bolstering downstream demand for copper.

“We anticipate demand from these particular sectors will grow from around 10 million MT in 2025 to 14 million MT in 2035. With most of the demand coming from energy transmission and generation,” Cruz said.

He went on to explain that transmission and generation account for 77 percent of the anticipated growth.

Cruz thinks energy demand has been overshadowed by the growth in data centers, where he suggested that copper demand will increase by only about 400,000 MT between 2025 and 2035.

“Of the growth I told you about from EVs with almost 4 million MT, or the demand from energy infrastructure with a little less than 3 million MT, it’s not that impressive. Although it still adds up to a substantial growth,” he said.

100 new copper mines by 2035?

The key takeaway from Cruz’s presentation was that a copper supply gap is developing. While he pointed out that the annual supply growth rate will come in at around 1 percent, demand is nearly double at 1.9 percent.

“This basically means that with the mines that currently exist, plus the projects that are under construction, we expect to see a difference in what needs to be mined and what will be mined in 2035 of around 7.4 million MT,” he said.

When probable projects are factored in, the supply gap narrows, but a 2.2 million MT shortfall still exists. However, these additional projects are not guaranteed. Cruz suggested that to avoid shortfalls, 100 new mines with output in the 75,000 MT range need to be built by 2035 — but this won’t be an easy task. Of the 10 largest mines in the world, only two were built after 2010; meanwhile, many of the others are decades or over 100 years old.

One reason new mines are scarce is long permitting processes, but Cruz also acknowledged that newly found large-scale deposits are at greater depths and lower grades. This has led to a scarcity of greenfield projects, with most growth coming from expansions at existing mines, a trend Cruz expects to continue over the coming years.

“Looking ahead, we expect this trend to continue to the point that we anticipate that by 2031, new production from greenfield projects will be half of what it was in 2011,” he said.

Additionally, Cruz said the copper market is becoming increasingly bifurcated, with China set to be a dominant force in both production and refinement of the red metal moving forward.

“The supply gap, or the future copper shortage, is something that the industry has been warning about for years now. The truth is, it seems not a lot of people are paying attention to it, but China has,” he said.

Cruz explained that China’s involvement in the Democratic Republic of Congo was the result of extensive planning and considerable investment. In fact, Chinese companies have collectively surpassed western producers and are securing their own supply chain.

Investor takeaway

Overall, Cruz believes the copper sector is well positioned for investment.

While he has some concern that smelting capacity is nearing saturation, he expects the situation to return to balance by 2031 and thinks that competition for concentrate will keep producer costs lower until then.

The combination of low treatment charges, high copper prices and even higher by-product gold, silver and molybdenum prices has helped increase margins and profitability for operators.

“We think that the market is in a very good position right now for miners at least. You could argue that for smelters it’s good as well despite the treatment and refinement charges, and we think that if these factors last a little bit longer, we expect some of these projects to bring the copper that humanity needs,” Cruz said.

Securities Disclosure: I, Dean Belder, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com