Author

admin

Browsing

Bitcoin is prone to price volatility, with wide swings to the upside and downside, making it difficult for investors to know when the right time to buy the top crypto is.

There has been renewed interest in cryptocurrencies following the election of US President Donald Trump, leading the Bitcoin price to soar to new heights in 2025, as investors and other industry insiders speculate on how the Trump administration’s policies could further grow the sector and encourage mainstream adoption.

Trump ran on a platform that promised to make the US the Bitcoin capital of the world, vowing to establish a national reserve for the asset, and several states have already introduced legislation to create similar reserves within their borders.

The price of Bitcoin pulled back to under US$100,000 in February 2025 and fell as low as US$75,000 by April 9, marking a strong buying opportunity for crypto investors. Bitcoin rebounded in May, breaking past the US$100,000 level and surging further over the summer to hit fresh all-time highs in July and August of more than US$120,000 per BTC.

Meanwhile, institutions and businesses like Michael Saylor’s Strategy have continued to buy Bitcoin by the millions, and spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain popular.

This surge of interest paints a bullish picture of Bitcoin’s continued growth. However, buying Bitcoin isn’t a simple decision. Read on to learn the basics of Bitcoin fundamentals, price forecasts and methods for determining if now’s the right time to buy Bitcoin, including several popular technical trading indicators you should know.

In this article

    What gives Bitcoin its value? 5 factors to know

    Before you decide if Bitcoin is a good investment for you, you need to understand Bitcoin and the wider crypto market.

    Bitcoin was the world’s first cryptocurrency, created in January 2009 by the mysterious Satoshi Nakamoto.

    Conceived as a virtual alternative to fiat currency, Bitcoin is built atop blockchain technology, which it uses for both validation and security. Blockchain itself is a distributed digital ledger of transactions, operating through a combination of private keys, public keys and network consensus.

    The best analogy to explain how this works in practice involves Google Docs. Imagine a document that’s shared with a group of collaborators. Everyone has access to the same document, and each collaborator can see the edits other collaborators have made. If anyone makes an edit that the other collaborators don’t approve of, they can roll it back.

    Going back to Bitcoin, the virtual currency primarily validates transactions through proof of work. Also known as Bitcoin mining, this competitive and incredibly resource-intensive process is the means by which new Bitcoins are generated.

    How it works is deceptively simple. Each Bitcoin transaction adds a new ‘block’ to the ledger, identified by a 64-digit encrypted hexadecimal number known as a hash. Each block uses the block immediately preceding it to generate its hash, creating a ledger that theoretically cannot be tampered with. Bitcoin miners collectively attempt to guess the encrypted hex code for each new block — whoever correctly identifies the hash then validates the transaction and receives a small amount of Bitcoins as a reward.

    From an investment perspective, Bitcoin toes the line between being a medium of exchange and a speculative digital asset. It also lacks any central governing body to regulate its distribution. As one might expect, these factors together make Bitcoin quite volatile, and therefore somewhat risky as an investment target.

    As for the source of this volatility, Bitcoin’s value is primarily influenced by five factors.

    1. Supply and demand

    It’s widely known that no more than 21 million Bitcoins can be produced, and that’s unlikely to happen before 2140.

    Only a certain number of Bitcoins are released each year, and this rate is reduced every four years by halving the reward for Bitcoin mining. The last of these ‘halvings’ occurred in April 2024 and the next one is due sometime in 2028. When it happens, there may be a significant increase in Bitcoin demand, largely driven by media coverage and investor interest.

    Bitcoin demand is also strengthening in countries experiencing currency devaluation and high inflation.

    It would be remiss not to mention that Bitcoin represents an ideal mechanism for supporting illicit activities — meaning that increasing cybercrime could itself be a demand driver.

    2. Production costs

    It’s said that Bitcoin benefits from minimal production costs. This isn’t exactly true, however. Solving even a single hash requires immense processing power, and it’s believed that crypto mining collectively uses more electricity than some small countries. It’s also believed that miners were largely responsible for the chip shortage experienced throughout the pandemic due to buying and burning out vast quantities of graphics cards.

    These costs together have only a minimal influence on Bitcoin’s overall value. The complexity of Bitcoin’s hashing algorithms and the fact that they can vary wildly in complexity are far more impactful.

    3. Competition

    Bitcoin’s cryptocurrency market share has sharply declined over the years. In 2017, it maintained a market share of over 80 percent. Bitcoin’s current market share is just under 60 percent.

    Despite that fall, Bitcoin remains the dominant force in the cryptocurrency market and is the marker by which many other cryptocurrencies determine their value. However, there is no guarantee that this will always remain the case. There are now scores of Bitcoin alternatives, known collectively as altcoins, which you can learn more about here.

    The most significant alternative to Bitcoin is Ethereum. Currently accounting for roughly 10 percent of the crypto market, Ethereum has long maintained its position as the second largest cryptocurrency. Some experts have suggested that Ethereum may even overtake Bitcoin, but others don’t see that as a possibility in the near future.

    4. Regulations

    Bitcoin may itself be unregulated, but it is not immune to the effects of government legislation. For instance, China’s 2021 ban of the cryptocurrency caused a sharp price drop, though it quickly rallied in the following months. The European Union has also attempted to ban Bitcoin in the past, and Nic Carter, a partner at Castle Venture, accused the US of trying to do the same in February 2023.

    There has been plenty of discussion surrounding the role of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in regulating Bitcoin and other crypto as investment assets. The US made progress in establishing crypto legislation in 2024 when the House passed the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century (FIT21) Act in a bipartisan 279 to 136 vote on May 22 of last year.

    While that act has yet to make further progress, the new Trump administration has already loosened some crypto regulation with regards to crypto reporting for banks and decentralized finance businesses.

    In April 2025, the SEC approved rule changes allowing Ether ETF options, and also updated its guidance on crypto company disclosures.

    Around the same time, President Trump signed a resolution repealing the Internal Revenue Services’ (IRS) controversial DeFi broker rule. Enacted at the end of the Biden Administration, the rule expanded the definition of “broker” to include decentralized finance, or DeFi, platforms. The reversal passed both chambers of Congress with bipartisan support.

    In July, Trump signed the GENIUS Act into law, which establishes a regulatory framework for payment in stablecoins. Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent has stated that the law paves the way for a potential stablecoin market worth US$3.7 trillion by 2030.

    5. Public interest and media coverage

    As with any speculative commodity, Bitcoin is greatly influenced by the court of public opinion.

    Perhaps the best example of this occurred in 2021. At that time, a tweet from Tesla’s (NASDAQ:TSLA) Elon Musk caused Bitcoin’s price to drop by 30 percent in a single day. This also wiped about US$365 billion off the cryptocurrency market.

    Another example occurred on January 9, 2024, leading up to the deadline for eight spot Bitcoin ETFs by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In a since-deleted post on X, formerly known as Twitter, a hacker falsely stated that the SEC had approved all eight pending Bitcoin ETFs. This caused the price of Bitcoin to spike to US$48,000, but it quickly dropped back down to around US$46,000 after the SEC confirmed it was a hack, leading some analysts to consider it a ‘sell-the-news’ event.

    Is now a good time to buy Bitcoin?

    The current US administration is crypto friendly, and Bitcoin and altcoins are seeing support in 2025. Could they go even higher, or should you wait for a dip to buy? Bitcoin is notoriously volatile, which can make it difficult to judge where the crypto is going next, but there are several strategies to help investors decide when to invest.

    To determine if it is a good time to invest in Bitcoin, investors should pay attention to the market and listen to the experts, as generally speaking, Bitcoin’s price action is sentiment-driven. To keep on top of big news in the sector, follow our frequent Crypto Market Updates, which drop several times a week.

    There are also different technical indicators that crypto traders use to help them decide if now is the time to buy or sell Bitcoin. We run through some popular indicators below.

    For example, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) is a technical indicator used to gauge the momentum of a cryptocurrency’s price. It fluctuates on a scale from 0 to 100. By analyzing the magnitude of recent price changes relative to the previous 12-month period, the RSI helps traders identify whether a cryptocurrency is potentially overbought or oversold. An RSI above 70 often signals an overbought market, while an RSI below 30 suggests an oversold market.

    Another metric to consider is the MVRV Z-score, calculated by subtracting the ‘realized’ value of Bitcoin, which is an average of the prices at which each Bitcoin was last moved, from the current market value. This is then divided by the standard deviation of the Bitcoin market cap.

    This indicator helps identify when market value deviates strongly from realized value, which could show the market is at a turning point. A score above 7 likely indicates that Bitcoin is overvalued, meaning it could be due for a correction, while a score below 0 suggests that Bitcoin is undervalued, meaning it could be a good buying opportunity.

    Finally, to gauge the overall market sentiment, investors can look at the Fear & Greed Index. This index provides a snapshot of how optimistic or fearful the market is about Bitcoin, with high readings potentially signaling overenthusiasm and a possible correction.

    While it’s useful to learn these technical indicators to help you trade, it is important to remember that there’s no such thing as a guaranteed investment, especially when it comes to cryptocurrencies. On the one hand, there’s virtually no chance that Bitcoin will experience a crash to zero. On the other hand, we also cannot take for granted that its value will continue to climb.

    What is Bitcoin’s long-term price outlook?

    For those considering Bitcoin as a long-term investment, it’s worth considering experts’ thoughts on Bitcoin in the future.

    During the run-up to the new highs posted in July 2025, Eugene Cheung, chief commercial officer of crypto platform OSL, told Cointelegraph that he thinks the digital asset could reach US$130,000 to US$150,000 by the end of the year.

    Fundstrat’s Tom Lee, who predicted Bitcoin’s peak in 2024, is calling for the digital currency to reach US$250,000 before 2025 comes to a close.

    Not everyone is so optimistic about Bitcoin’s prospects. Top Economist Henrik Zeberg has expressed concerns about Bitcoin’s future in the context of continued economic uncertainty, as its price remains highly linked with the performance of the tech-stock heavy NASDAQ.

    Billionaire investor Warren Buffet, meanwhile, has not minced words regarding his opinion on Bitcoin and its future. According to Buffet, Bitcoin is an unproductive asset with no unique value. He also feels that it doesn’t count as a true currency — in fact, he called it “rat poison.” Moreover, he believes that the crypto market as a whole will end badly.

    Who holds the most Bitcoin?

    Regardless of whether you believe Bitcoin’s proponents or naysayers, it’s clear that it has some incredibly prominent backers in both the investment world and the wider business landscape.

    Business analytics platform Strategy (NASDAQ:MSTR) is by far the largest public company in the Bitcoin space, with 628,946 Bitcoin to its name as of August 11, 2025. The next three public companies with the largest Bitcoin holdings are Marathon Digital Holdings (NASDAQ:MARA) with 50,639 Bitcoin, soon-to-list Twenty One Capital (NASDAQ:XXI) with 37,229.7 Bitcoin and Bullish (NYSE:BLSH) with 24,340 Bitcoin.

    The US, China and the United Kingdom hold the top three spots for countries with the most Bitcoin holdings, with 198,012, 194,000 and 61,245 Bitcoin respectively at that time.

    There are also plenty of individuals with large holdings, the most significant of which is believed to be Bitcoin’s creator, Satoshi Nakamoto. Other prominent names include Michael Saylor, Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, and Tim Draper.

    How to smartly invest in Bitcoin?

    To help increase the odds of crypto being a good investment, investors in the Bitcoin market should learn the basics of safely investing in Bitcoin.

    How to buy Bitcoin

    The good news is that investing in Bitcoin is actually quite simple. If you’re purchasing through a stockbroker, it’s a similar process to buying shares of a company. Otherwise, you may need to gather your personal information and bank account details. It’s recommended to secure your network with a VPN prior to performing any Bitcoin transactions.

    The first step in purchasing Bitcoin is to join an exchange. Coinbase Global (NASDAQ:COIN) is one of the most popular, but there’s also Kraken and Bybit. If you’re an advanced trader outside the US, you might consider Bitfinex.

    Once you’ve chosen an exchange, you’ll need a crypto wallet. Many first-time investors choose a software-based or ‘hot’ wallet either maintained by their chosen crypto exchange or operated by a service provider. While simpler to set up and more convenient overall, hot wallets tend to be less secure as they can be compromised by data breaches.

    Another option is a ‘cold’ wallet — a specialized piece of hardware specifically designed to store cryptocurrency. It’s basically a purpose-built flash drive. If you plan to invest large amounts in crypto, a cold wallet is the better option.

    Once you’ve acquired and configured your wallet, you may choose to connect either the wallet or your crypto exchange account to your bank account. This is not strictly necessary, and some seasoned investors don’t bother to do this.

    Finally, with your wallet fully configured and your exchange account set up, it’s time to place your order.

    Best practices for investing in Bitcoin

    The most important thing to remember about Bitcoin is that it is a high-risk asset. Treat Bitcoin as a means of slowly growing your existing wealth rather than an all-or-nothing gamble, and never invest money that you aren’t willing to lose.

    As with other investments, it’s important to hedge your portfolio. Alongside Bitcoin, you may want to consider investing in other cryptocurrencies like Ethereum, or perhaps an altcoin. You may also want to explore other blockchain-based investments, given that even the most stable cryptocurrencies tend to be fairly volatile.

    It’s also key to ignore the hype surrounding cryptocurrencies. Recall how many people whipped themselves into a frenzy over non-fungible tokens in 2022. The majority of NFTs created during that time are now worthless.

    Make decisions based on your own market research and advice from trusted — and more importantly, certified — professionals. If you’re putting up investment capital based on an influencer’s tweets, you are playing with fire.

    You should also start small. A good rule of thumb is not to dedicate more than 10 percent of your overall capital to cryptocurrency. Even that number could be high — again, it’s all about moderation.

    Make sure to prioritize cybersecurity as well. Cryptocurrencies are an immensely popular target for cybercriminals. In addition to maintaining a cold wallet, make sure you practice proper security hygiene. That means using a VPN and a password manager while also exercising mindfulness in how you browse the web and what you download.

    Finally, make an effort to understand what cryptocurrencies are and how they work. One of the reasons Sam Bankman-Fried was able to run FTX as long as he did was because many of his investors didn’t fully understand what they were putting their money into. Don’t let yourself be fooled by buzzwords or lofty promises about Web3 and the metaverse.

    Do your research into the technology behind it all. That way, you’ll be far better equipped to recognize when something is a sound investment versus a bottomless money pit.

    Indirect crypto investing

    Given Bitcoin’s volatility, it’s understandable that you might be leery of making a direct investment. The good news is that you don’t have to. You can indirectly invest into the crypto space through mutual funds, stocks and ETFs.

    ETFs are a popular and flexible portfolio choice that allows investors to benefit from a sector’s performance without the need to directly own individual stocks or assets. They are an especially appealing option in the cryptocurrency market as the technical aspects of purchasing and holding these coins can be confusing and intimidating for the less technologically inclined.

    Bitcoin futures ETFs provide exposure to the cryptocurrency’s price moves using Bitcoin futures contracts, which stipulate that two parties will exchange a specific amount of Bitcoins for a particular price on a predetermined date.

    Conversely, spot Bitcoin ETFs aim to track the price of Bitcoin, and they do so by holding the asset. Spot Bitcoin ETFs have been offered to Canadians since 2021, and there are now 13 Canadian cryptocurrency ETFs you can buy. Spot Bitcoin ETFs began trading in the US on January 11, 2024. For investors interested in blockchain technology, there are also several blockchain ETFs.

    Do a bit of research and touch base with your stockbroker or financial advisor before you go in this direction.

    Investor takeaway

    Bitcoin is a fascinating asset. Simultaneously a transactional tool and a speculative commodity, it’s attracted the attention of investors almost since it first hit the market. Unfortunately, it’s also incredibly volatile.

    For that reason, while current market conditions are favorable for anyone considering buying Bitcoin, it is an asset you should purchase only at your own risk. Because while Bitcoin may have the potential for significant returns, you may also lose most of your investment. If that knowledge doesn’t bother you, then by all means, purchase away.

    Otherwise, there are better — less volatile — options for your capital.

    FAQs for buying Bitcoin

    What does Cathie Wood say about Bitcoin?

    ARK Invest CEO Cathie Wood is extremely bullish on Bitcoin, telling Bloomberg in February 2023 that her firm believes the cryptocurrency could reach a value of US$1 million by 2030. In July 2025, Wood hiked her 2030 bitcoin price prediction to US$3.8 billion.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Meagen Seatter, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    Phosphate is mainly used in the form of fertilizer for crops and animal feed supplements. Only 5 percent of world phosphate production is used for other applications, such as corrosion prevention and detergents.

    In its 2025 Mineral Commodity Summary, the US Geological Survey (USGS) states that global production of phosphate grew in 2024 alongside demand, totaling 240 million metric tons. Most of 2024 was marked by steady growth in agricultural demand in the face of declining quality reserves.

    ‘World consumption of P2O5 contained in fertilizers was estimated to have been 47.5 million tons in 2024 compared with 45.8 million tons in 2023,’ the USGS reported. ‘World consumption of P2O5 in fertilizers was projected to increase to 51.8 million tons by 2028. The leading regions for growth were expected to be Asia and South America.’

    This list of the top phosphate countries by production is based on data from the USGS. Those interested in the phosphate mining sector will want to keep an eye on phosphate production data and mining companies in these countries.

    1. China

    Phosphate production: 110 million metric tons
    Phosphate reserves: 3.7 billion metric tons

    China’s phosphate production increased in 2024 to 110 million metric tons (MT), up from 105 million MT in 2023, placing it as number one on the list of top phosphate-producing countries by a long shot. China has the second largest phosphate reserves in the world at 3.7 billion metric tons of phosphate. The country is also the fourth largest producer of fellow fertilizer mineral potash.

    The rise in Chinese output came in despite of the nation’s environmental crackdown on the mining industry. China’s government has placed restrictions on phosphate exports in an effort to drive down domestic prices of the fertilizer with its own supply. In December 2024, China halted new export applications for phosphate due to the rising cost of sulfur. The material is critical in the separation of phosphates from rock.

    2. Morocco

    Phosphate production: 30 million metric tons
    Phosphate reserves: 50 billion metric tons

    As the second largest phosphate-producing country, Morocco produced 30 million metric tons of the fertilizer in 2024, down from 33 million MT in the previous year. The North African nation’s phosphate output is expected to increased in the coming years due to ongoing capacity expansions, which are expected to be completed by 2027.

    Morocco’s phosphate production comes from state-owned fertilizer company OCP Group’s mines, including its Gantour operation, one of the world’s largest phosphate mines.

    Morocco holds the world’s largest phosphate reserves at 50 billion metric tons, accounting for over 67 percent of total global phosphate reserves.

    3. United States

    Phosphate production: 20 million metric tons
    Phosphate reserves: 1 billion metric tons

    In 2024, US phosphate mining production totaled 20 million metric tons, up slightly by 400,000 metric tons from the previous year. The nation’s 10 producing phosphate mines are located across four states: Florida, North Carolina, Idaho and Utah.

    The two largest phosphate mining companies in the US are Mosaic (NYSE:MOS) and Nutrien (TSX:NTR). Global giant Mosaic’s Florida phosphates operation comprises three producing mines: Four Corners, South Fort Meade and Wingate. The three mines combined for 8,900 MT of phosphate rock concentrate in 2024. Nutrien operates the Aurora mine in North Carolina and White Springs mine in Utah.

    Most phosphate rock mined in the US is used for manufacturing phosphoric acid and superphosphoric acid. These types of wet-process phosphate products are used for items such as animal feed supplements. About a quarter of this is exported in the form of merchant-grade phosphoric acid, upgraded granular diammonium and monoammonium phosphate fertilizer, as well as other fertilizer products, according to the USGS.

    4. Russia

    Phosphate production: 14 million metric tons
    Phosphate reserves: 2.4 billion metric tons

    Russia produced 14 million metric tons of phosphate in 2024, down by 1 million MT from the previous year, and the country’s phosphate reserves total 2.4 billion metric tons. Russia is also the second largest producer of potash.

    A significant portion of Russia’s phosphate is produced by PhosAgro subsidiary Apatit from apatite minerals at the Khibiny deposit, which is located east of Finland in Russia’s Kola Peninsula. Phosphate operations are also found in Perm Krai at the Oleniy Ruchey apatite mine and processing facility owned by the Acron Group’s North-Western Phosphorous Company.

    European nations were previously Russia’s biggest phosphate customers in the global market, but the country’s war in Ukraine initially had an impact, directly influencing phosphate prices. However, Russian phosphate exports were supported through increases in shipments to countries including India and Brazil.

    5. Jordan

    Phosphate production: 12 million metric tons
    Phosphate reserves: 1 billion metric tons

    Jordan’s phosphate production came in at 12 million metric tons in 2024, rising slightly from the previous year. Jordan’s phosphate reserves stand at an estimated 1 billion MT.

    The country’s sole phosphate producer is state-owned Jordan Phosphate Mines Company, which operates as a phosphate miner and fertilizer producer. The company bills itself as the second largest phosphate exporter and the sixth largest producer of phosphate in the world, with combined production capacity between its three mines exceeding 11 million metric tons of phosphate annually.

    6. Saudi Arabia

    Phosphate production: 9.5 million metric tons
    Phosphate reserves: 1 billion metric tons

    Saudi Arabia produced 9.5 million metric tons of phosphate in 2024, down by 400,000 MT from 2023’s output level. The country is sitting on 1 billion MT of phosphate reserves. The Saudi Arabian Mining Company, also known as Ma’aden, produces up to 5 million metric tons of concentrated phosphate rock per year.

    The Wa’ad Al Shamal Minerals Industrial City, an integrated phosphate fertilizer production complex, is a US$8 billion joint venture investment between Ma’aden at 60 percent, chemical manufacturer Saudi Basic Industries (TADAWUL:2010) at 15 percent and US fertilizer giant Mosaic at 25 percent. However, in January 2025, Mosaic sold its stake for US$1.5 billion in Ma’aden shares, bringing the latter company’s interest to 85 percent.

    7. Brazil

    Phosphate production: 5.3 million metric tons
    Phosphate reserves: 1.6 billion metric tons

    Brazil, another of the top phosphate countries by production, produced 5.3 million metric tons of phosphate in 2024, nearly on par with its production in the previous year. Brazil has a booming agricultural sector and is one of the world’s largest fertilizer consumers and importers. More phosphate production capacity in the country is expected to come online in 2027.

    Mosaic is the country’s largest producer of both phosphate and nitrogen, and it also operates Brazil’s only potash mine. Swedish fertilizer company Eurochem launched a new US$1 billion phosphate fertilizer production facility in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil, in April 2024. The facility has a phosphate mine and plant complex with an annual production capacity of 1 million MT of advanced phosphate fertilizers.

    8. Egypt

    Phosphate production: 5 million metric tons
    Phosphate reserves: 2.8 billion metric tons

    Egypt’s phosphate-mining production in 2024 totalled 5 million metric tons, on par with 2023 output levels. According to the US Geological Survey, Egypt’s phosphate reserves now sit at 2.8 billion MT.

    The phosphate company Misr Phosphate operates the Abu Tartour, the Sibaiya and the Red Sea mines, all of which host high grades of phosphate.

    9. Peru

    Phosphate production: 4.7 million metric tons
    Phosphate reserves: 210 million metric tons

    Peru produced 4.7 million metric tons of phosphate in 2024, down by 300,000 MT from the previous year. About 98 percent of US phosphate imports originate from Peru.

    Peru’s investment agency ProInversión made a US$940 million commitment in mid-2024 for the expansion Fosfatos del Pacífico’s Bayóvar mine in the Piura region, which is expected to bolster the country’s domestic phosphate production for the next 10 years.

    10. Tunisia

    Phosphate production: 3.3 million metric tons
    Phosphate reserves: 2.5 billion metric tons

    Tunisia’s phosphate output in 2024 totaled 3.3 million metric tons, down from 3.6 million metric tons the previous year. Tunisia is home to the fourth highest phosphate reserves in the world at 2.5 billion metric tons.

    The North African country has been rising among the ranks of the world’s largest phosphate producing nations. In 2023 Tunisia’s state-owned phosphate firm Gafsa Phosphate Company ramped up its production as part of its US$76 million investment program.

    FAQS for phosphate

    What are phosphates?

    Phosphates are compounds that usually include phosphorous and oxygen, and can have one or more common elements, such as sodium, calcium, potassium and aluminum.

    Where are phosphate compounds found?

    Phosphate is mostly found in phosphate rock, a non-detrital sedimentary rock that contains high amounts of phosphate minerals. Phosphate rock can come in different forms such as quartz, calcite, dolomite, apatite, iron oxide minerals and clay minerals.

    Is phosphate the same as phosphorus in fertilizer?

    Phosphate is the natural source of phosphorous, which provides essential nutrients for plant growth and development.

    Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

    This post appeared first on investingnews.com

    The Indiana Fever are fighting to keep their playoff hopes alive.

    The Fever (19-18) have slid to eighth place in the WNBA standings after dropping six of their last eight games amid a number of devastating injuries  Sydney Colson (left ACL tear), Aari McDonald (broken right foot) and Sophie Cunningham (right MCL tear) were all ruled out for the season. Point guard Caitlin Clark (right groin) remains sidelined indefinitely.

    The surging Los Angeles Sparks (17-18) are on the Fever’s heels, one game behind Indiana. That makes the Fever’s game against the Seattle Storm (20-18) Tuesday is a must win.

    ‘We are a team that is still reintegrating new pieces, but we have to find a way to make it click,’ Fever head coach Stephanie White said following the Fever’s 97-84 loss to the Lynx on Sunday. ‘For us, we got to focus on one game at a time. We have to control what we can control and that’s our next opponent. That’s going to be Seattle coming into our place and that’s a big one.’

    The Storm enter Tuesday’s matchup on a three-game win streak following a 84-82 victory over the Washington Mystics on Sunday, where Nneka Ogwumike hit a game-winning jumper as time expired. Ogwumike finished with 30 points, six rebounds and two assists, knocking down a career-high six 3-pointers as her team sits in sixth place in the standings.

    Meanwhile, the Fever are coming off back-to-back losses to the league-leading Minnesota Lynx. Kelsey Mitchell had a team-high 26 points in the Fever’s 97-84 loss to the Lynx on Sunday. Guard Shey Peddy, who the Fever signed to a seven-day hardship contract on Aug. 19, had 16 points off the bench.

    Here’s everything you need to know about Tuesday’s matchup between the Fever and Storm:

    What time is Indiana Fever vs. Seattle Storm?

    The Indiana Fever host the Seattle Storm in Indianapolis at 7 p.m. ET (4 p.m. PT) on Tuesday, Aug. 26 at Gainbridge Fieldhouse. The game will be broadcast on CBS Sports Network.

    How to watch Indiana Fever vs. Minnesota Lynx: TV, stream

    • Time: 7 p.m. ET (4 p.m. PT)
    • Location: Gainbridge Fieldhouse (Indianapolis)
    • TV channel: CBS Sports Network
    • Streaming: Paramount+, Fubo (free trial to new subscribers)

    The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

    This post appeared first on USA TODAY

    • Former Nebraska coach Tom Osborne revealed he voted for Georgia Tech over Colorado for the 1990 national championship.
    • Osborne cited Colorado’s controversial fifth-down win against Missouri and Georgia Tech’s more decisive victory over his own team as reasons for his vote.
    • The two teams will face each other for the first time in the 2025 season opener.

    Nearly 35 years later, former Nebraska coach Tom Osborne finally is willing to talk about which team he voted to win the national championship for the 1990 college football season.

    Did he select Big Eight Conference rival Colorado as the nation’s No. 1 team after the Buffaloes beat Notre Dame in the Orange Bowl on Jan. 1, 1991?

    Or did he instead coronate Georgia Tech, which beat his Nebraska team that same day in the Citrus Bowl?

    Osborne, 88, discussed it by phone with USA TODAY Sports as Colorado and coach Deion Sanders prepare to face Georgia Tech in a season-opening game in Boulder on Friday, Aug. 29. It will be the first meeting of Colorado and Georgia Tech despite forever being linked by what happened in the voting for that national championship.

    “If you wanted to know how I voted, I did vote for Georgia Tech,” Osborne said.

    Osborne was seen as an important vote because his team was the only one that played both teams in the 1990 season. He previously has declined to talk about it publicly, even though many speculated he voted Georgia Tech No. 1, perhaps even to deny league foe Colorado of a national championship prize that he had had yet to win.

    Osborne denies he did it to spite Colorado. “I would never do that,” he said.

    He had other reasons.

    What happened with the Coaches Poll voting?

    There was no College Football Playoff back then. The national championship instead was decided by voters in two main polls after teams played their postseason bowl games.

    Their link to a shared national title serves as a reminder of how controversy and conflicts of interest could shape the sport back then in an age before replay review and rules to prevent such conflicts.

    Something seemed especially strange about the Coaches Poll then because the balloting was secret and the winning margin in that poll was only one point (847-846), including a 30-27 margin in first-place votes for Georgia Tech.

    The coaches’ voting then was tabulated by Jeff Shain, then the sports editor of United Press International (UPI), which sponsored the poll. Shain told USA TODAY Sports recently that after 58 ballots were counted in the final Coaches Poll on Jan. 2, 1991, Colorado and Georgia Tech were tied at No. 1 with one vote left to be tracked down. That 59th and final coach then voted for Georgia Tech to break the tie.

    “That coach, unbeknownst to him, essentially swung the national title,” Shain said. “All 59 votes count the same, but because he was last, it was the determining ballot.”

    Who was the final vote in the Coaches Poll?

    Shain said it wasn’t Osborne. But because the margin was only one point, any coach who voted Georgia Tech No. 1 could have changed the result had he voted for Colorado instead.

    Shain declined to say who cast the final vote, citing a confidentiality agreement with the coaches’ association back then.

    He confirmed the ballots were required to be kept secret and then thrown away.

    “Our procedure was to tally them and toss them,” Shain said.

    By contrast, the final Associated Press poll wasn’t as close or controversial: It was 39-20 in first-place voting for Colorado over Georgia Tech. That poll of voters in the news media also had consistently kept Colorado No. 1 since November 1990 as the Buffaloes navigated one of the nation’s toughest schedules.

    Swing in final voting for Georgia Tech

    In a big shift, the Coaches Poll moved Georgia Tech into the No. 1 spot even though Colorado was in first in the previous poll in December 1990 and the Buffaloes beat No. 5 Notre Dame the day before, 10-9. It was the first time in that poll’s history that a No. 1 team fell out of the top spot after winning a bowl game. 

    This flipflop stunned then-Colorado coach Bill McCartney, who learned the results of the final UPI Coaches Poll after landing at the airport in Denver after the Orange Bowl, according to University of Colorado athletics historian Dave Plati

    “That’s not right,” McCartney said then. “You call UPI back and tell them to have the coaches vote again.’ 

    McCartney, who died in January,  long suspected Osborne had ranked Georgia Tech No. 1. Plati said he never got confirmation of Osborne’s ballot.

    “He would never come out and say where he voted us,” Plati said recently.

    Why did Tom Osborne vote for Georgia Tech?

    Coaches weren’t required to reveal their ballots in the final poll, unlike now in the US LBM Coaches Poll, administered by USA TODAY Sports. 

    The secrecy of the ballots and lack of confirmation from Osborne led to decades of rumors about how he voted and why.

    Osborne told USA TODAY Sports he doesn’t remember where he voted Colorado on his final ballot or final regular-season ballot. He cited two big factors for his final vote.  One was that Colorado had received an illegal fifth down to beat Missouri that season on the final play of the game, 33-31.  Another was that Georgia Tech beat his Nebraska team more soundly than Colorado did (45-21 by Georgia Tech, 27-12 by Colorado).

    “They were both good teams, and I think the distinguishing factor was Colorado ended up having five downs in one of their wins and Georgia Tech didn’t have any somewhat questionable finishes,” Osborne told USA TODAY Sports. “So I voted for Georgia Tech, and of course we played them both. I thought Georgia Tech at the end of the year was pretty good.”

    Why was the Colorado fifth-down game an issue?

    Colorado started the year 1-1-1, including a loss at Illinois and a tie against Tennessee in Anaheim, California, before finishing with 10 consecutive wins. But one of those wins came on that fifth down at Missouri.

    It wasn’t Colorado’s fault, but the Buffs won on a final play that shouldn’t have been allowed.

    The officiating crew and scoreboard indicated it was third down when quarterback Charles S. Johnson spiked the ball to stop the clock. It was really fourth down after Colorado had run three previous plays from the Missouri 3-yard line, including another spiked ball to stop the clock on first down. Missouri was set to win, 31-27, if the game ended there.

    But if the quarterback had known it was really fourth down instead of third, he wouldn’t have spiked the ball to surrender the game on downs. He instead would have tried to win as he did on the next play − a 1-yard touchdown run on “fifth down” as time expired.

    The confusion stemmed from when game officials had failed to change the down marker from “2” to “3” after 2-yard gain on second down.

    Then-Missouri coach Bob Stull was a voter in the final poll back then, too. He told USA TODAY Sports he doesn’t remember how he voted. The Tigers were also Big Eight members with Nebraska and Colorado.

    “I wasn’t bitter on the (fifth-down) thing, so I don’t know if it carried at all,” Stull said. “You’ve got your conference you’re trying to vote for too, you know. I can’t tell you how I did, but that wouldn’t have come into play for me.”

    Major voting change in final Coaches Poll

    In previous voting to end the regular season in December 1990, the Coaches Poll had Colorado ranked No. 1 by a margin of 38-7 over Georgia Tech in first-place votes – 45 points total out a panel of 59 coaches. That means 14 coaches didn’t vote in that previous poll.

    But then in the final poll on Jan. 2, 1991, all 59 coaches voted, including 30 first-place votes for Georgia Tech, 27 for Colorado and two for Miami (Fla.).

    Shain said sometimes some coaches were simply hard to track down for their ballots because they were on the road recruiting and didn’t have cell phones then.

    “Voting is not high on their priority list,” he said.

    Why did Colorado lose support in that poll?

    Many coaches who voted back then have died or said they don’t remember how they voted. McCartney of Colorado voted his team No. 1 and Georgia Tech No. 2, according to Plati. Then-Georgia Tech coach Bobby Ross told USA TODAY Sports recently he also voted his own team No. 1.

    In Colorado’s case, there were other issues – the fifth-down win and a controversial clipping penalty against Notre Dame that nullified a last-minute punt return for a touchdown in the Orange Bowl by the Fighting Irish. Add them both together and coaches might have felt Colorado didn’t deserve it.

    Georgia Tech looked good in comparison. The Yellow Jackets finished the season undefeated with one tie against North Carolina, including wins against then-No. 1 Virginia and then-No. 13 Nebraska

    Ross also brought up the fifth-down win by Colorado but said he didn’t remember where he voted the Buffs.

    “Colorado won one game on a fifth down that was given to them,” Ross told USA TODAY Sports. “That was, to me, was another thing that would have worked against them.  I know they were an outstanding team. I think we were too at that time.”

    Poll conflicts and loyalty tests

    In today’s game, members of the committee that vote for the 12 teams in the College Football Playoff are required to recuse themselves from voting if there is a conflict of interest, including if they work for the school in question.

    But back then, these coaches decided part of the national title. And they not only voted for their own teams but also could possibly penalize others to their advantage in their secret balloting.

    What was to stop Ross from putting Colorado a little further down his list than where he thought they belonged?

    “I would have Colorado where I think they should have been,” Ross said.

    We don’t know if Ross or any coach sought to influence the final result this way. We do know that at least one coach or possibly two voted Georgia Tech multiple places behind Colorado because the Yellow Jackets finished with three more first-place votes but only a one-point margin.

    Others had reason to vote for teams in their own conference to enhance their league media exposure. Ironically, then-Nebraska athletic director Bob Devaney raised a stink about some Big Eight coaches voting Virginia No. 1 earlier in the 1990 season instead of Nebraska.

    Osborne ultimately didn’t follow Devaney’s Big Eight loyalty beliefs, nor was he required to do so.

    “Georgia Tech beat us by a bigger margin than Colorado, and then there was that little bit of a controversial thing with Colorado,” Osborne said. “So I thought I Georgia Tech deserved at that point to be No. 1. You make a judgment. That’s the basis of my judgment.”

    Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

    This post appeared first on USA TODAY

    • USA TODAY Sports preseason glance at the Heisman favorites is loaded with quarterbacks.
    • Texas QB Arch Manning finally becomes the Longhorns’ unquestioned starter.
    • Ohio State WR Jeremiah Smith is the strongest non-QB contender for the Heisman Trophy entering the 2025 season.

    One year after Travis Hunter became the most unconventional Heisman Trophy winner in the award’s history by virtue of his both-ways brilliance for Colorado, look for the 2025 race to drift back toward tradition by focusing on a class of very specific and traditional contenders: high-profile and productive quarterbacks playing for the nation’s best teams.

    With the regular season just weeks away, the closest thing to an alternative option is Ohio State sophomore Jeremiah Smith, who after one year with the Buckeyes is beginning to build a case for being counted among the best wide receivers in recent Bowl Subdivision history.

    Otherwise, USA TODAY Sports preseason glance at the Heisman favorites is loaded with quarterbacks such as Arch Manning, Cade Klubnik and Drew Allar.

    PATH TO PLAYOFF: Sign up for our college football newsletter

    Manning has the name recognition to cruise to the Heisman – something his famous grandfather and uncles didn’t achieve – but will spend his debut year as the starter at Texas under a blindingly bright spotlight.

    His obvious ability and the Longhorns’ surrounding talent makes Manning the early favorite, with Klubnik, Allar and others just behind. Here are the eight players to watch heading into regular season:

    QB Arch Manning, Texas

    Manning was very good in limited duty as a redshirt freshman, completing 61 of 90 attempts for 939 yards with 13 combined scores, four on the ground. But he also did the overwhelming majority of that work early in the year, against opponents such as Texas-San Antonio, Louisiana-Monroe and Mississippi State. From October on, Manning made 12 pass attempts for 38 yards while running for 26 yards and a touchdown. Basically, there is much to prove but plenty to like about how well he’ll play as the Longhorns’ unquestioned starter.

    QB Cade Klubnik, Clemson

    Klubnik started coming into his own in 2024 to help deliver Clemson’s eighth ACC championship in the past decade. He also hit a few speedbumps, as in the opener against Georgia and later losses to Louisville and South Carolina. Consistency will be key for the senior to deliver the first Heisman in program history. As with Manning, though, Klubnik will be surrounded by a terrific supporting cast and could have his team at or near the top of the polls heading into the postseason.

    WR Jeremiah Smith, Ohio State

    Smith is a transcendent talent capable of changing the complexion of every game Ohio State plays. Virtually unguardable as a freshman, when he delivered 76 catches for 1,315 yards and 15 scores, Smith’s reliability will be even more vital given the Buckeyes’ offseason changes at quarterback and offensive coordinator. He’ll have plenty of opportunities to deliver a Heisman moment, beginning with a non-conference home against the top-ranked Longhorns to open the year.

    QB Drew Allar, Penn State

    Allar could check all the boxes for the Heisman. He’ll play alongside an elite backfield, throw to a deeper receiver corps than in 2024 and take snaps in front of the strongest offensive line of the James Franklin era. Importantly, the senior could lead the Nittany Lions to the Big Ten championship and one of the top seeds in the College Football Playoff. Throw in a nice framing device – the attempt to bounce back from the interception he tossed to end last year’s loss to Notre Dame in the national semifinals – and Allar has all the ingredients for a run at the award.

    QB Garrett Nussmeier, LSU

    The only returning 4,000-yard passer from last season, Nussmeier will put up Heisman-level numbers in one of the nation’s two strongest conferences. Whether the senior can rise to Heisman frontrunner status depends on where LSU falls in the SEC and playoff chase: Will Nussmeier’s numbers have an empty-calories feel amid another disappointing season for the Tigers? Or is this team ready to take the leap and make Nussmeier the program’s third Heisman-winning quarterback in six years? Regardless, he could land at or near the top of next year’s NFL draft by improving his touch and ball placement while trimming his turnover-worthy plays.

    QB John Mateer, Oklahoma

    How Mateer’s game translates from Washington State to Oklahoma will determine whether Oklahoma can rebound from last season’s disastrous SEC debut and solidify coach Brent Venables’ weakened job security. If the SEC doesn’t prove too much for Mateer and former WSU offensive coordinator Ben Arbuckle, the Sooners could add three or four wins to become the surprise team in the Power Four. Mateer had 44 combined touchdowns and ranked eighth nationally in efficiency rating last season.

    QB LaNorris Sellers, South Carolina

    Sellers is a burgeoning star for the Gamecocks who might be one year away from being a top-end Heisman contender. But the sophomore could be a legitimate option this fall should he match his run over the second half of 2024 and push South Carolina into the playoff after coming up just short last season. Sellers accounted for 17 touchdowns and ran for 166 yards on 10.4 yards per carry against rival Clemson as USC won six in a row to end the regular season.

    QB Sam Leavitt, Arizona State

    Leavitt will need to take on an even larger role as the Sun Devils rework things offensively to offset the loss of star running back Cam Skattebo. The sophomore should be up to the challenge after throwing for 2,885 yards and 24 touchdowns against six interceptions in 2024.

    This post appeared first on USA TODAY

    • The NFL’s roster cutdown deadline is at 4 p.m. ET on Tuesday.
    • Teams aren’t waiting until the last minute, however, with several already taking action over the weekend.
    • Several backup quarterbacks and former high draft picks could be on thin ice for their respective teams’ final roster spots.

    For many NFL teams, Tuesday’s roster cutdown deadline marks perhaps the biggest hurdle remaining before preparation for the regular season begins in earnest. For hundreds of players, however, the paring down can mark a painful end of the line.

    Established starters and early draft picks typically have nothing to fear as teams set their initial 53-man rosters, but the culmination of the preseason schedule necessarily leads to some disappointment and difficult decisions. Some long shot bids will officially come to an end. But those who set out to scrape for a spot at the end of the roster are signing up for a transient lifestyle, and this might just be the first – or latest – in a series of setbacks. But hope remains, as any notion of finality with the cutdowns is quickly dispelled by additional waiver moves, trades and practice squad transactions in the coming days, weeks and months.

    Here’s a look back at all of the notable moves from Monday:

    Broncos roster cuts: Backfield reshuffling continues

    The Denver Broncos continue to reshape their running back rotation.

    The team plans to waive backup Audric Estime, according to multiple reports.

    Estime, a fifth-round pick last April out of Notre Dame, ranked fourth on the team in rushing yards with 310 as a rookie. But with veteran J.K. Dobbins and second-round rookie RJ Harvey coming aboard to pace the ground game and backup Jaleel McLoughlin returning a change-of-pace option, Estime became the odd man out in Sean Payton’s attack.

    Buccaneers roster cuts: Kyle Trask out, Teddy Bridgewater in as QB2

    Baker Mayfield has a new backup.

    The Tampa Bay Buccaneers plan to release quarterback Kyle Trask, ESPN’s Jeremy Fowler reported.

    Trask was the Buccaneers’ second-round pick in 2021, which was Tom Brady’s penultimate season with the team. But the former Florida standout couldn’t beat out Baker Mayfield in the 2023 preseason after Tom Brady retired, and Trask has attempted just 11 passes in his career to date.

    Tampa Bay then signed veteran Teddy Bridgewater on Aug. 5 and seemed to quickly favor him for the backup role. Bridgewater started the second preseason game against the Pittsburgh Steelers and threw two touchdown passes. He was held out of the finale with an illness.

    Raiders roster cuts: Familiar figures not sticking around

    The Las Vegas Raiders’ initial round of cuts didn’t feature any surprises, but some recognizable names won’t be on the 53-man roster.

    Wide receivers Marquez Callaway, Phillip Dorsett II and Collin Johnson were all released Monday, as was linebacker Jaylon Smith.

    The three veteran wideouts provided depth in camp, but Las Vegas looked to other options in its receiving corps, with multiple reports indicating Monday that five-time Pro Bowler Amari Cooper is heading back to the franchise that selected him No. 4 overall in 2015. Meanwhile, fourth-rounder Dont’e Thornton Jr. could potentially play a sizable role as a rookie while second-rounder Jack Bech and sixth-rounder Tommy Mellott wait for their turns as backups. Meanwhile, leading wideout Jakobi Meyers is seeking a trade amid a contract standoff, per reports.

    Smith was signed in May after a tryout at rookie minicamp, but the former Dallas Cowboys standout will have to look elsewhere as he tries to find his first game action since 2023.

    Commanders roster cuts: Michael Gallup’s comeback hits a roadblock

    A bevy of former Dallas Cowboys players have followed Dan Quinn to Washington. Michael Gallup, however, won’t be among those joining the Commanders’ roster to start 2025.

    The wide receiver was among six players released by the team on Monday.

    Gallup, 29, was attempting to make his comeback with the team after announcing his retirement last summer. He broke out by recording 1,107 receiving yards for the Cowboys in 2019, but a 2021 anterior cruciate ligament tear proved to be a sizable setback. The former third-round pick signed with the Las Vegas Raiders last year but stepped away from football last June.

    Washington, meanwhile, appears to have its receiving corps set with Terry McLaurin, Deebo Samuel Sr., Noah Brown, Luke McCaffrey and rookie Jaylin Lane.

    Buccaneers roster cuts: Desmond Watson’s trial run is up

    The Buccaneers are waiving the undrafted free agent defensive tackle from Florida, according to multiple reports.

    Watson, who was listed by the team at 449 pounds, had remained on the non-football illness list throughout the summer as the team pushed him to cut weight. Unable to do so, he was released outright rather than moved to the reserve-NFI list, suggesting that a return to Tampa Bay’s practice squad is unlikely.

    Lions roster cuts: Hendon Hooker’s time is up

    The Detroit Lions are cutting bait on the Hendon Hooker project.

    The team is releasing the quarterback, according to multiple reports, in a move that could position journeyman Kyle Allen to secure the backup spot behind Jared Goff.

    Hooker, 27, was a third-round pick out of Tennessee in 2023 and sat out his entire rookie season while recovering from a torn anterior cruciate ligament suffered late in his final collegiate season. In 2024, however, he played in just four games, and Detroit signed veteran Teddy Bridgewater late in the campaign to hold down the backup role.

    Hooker struggled throughout the preseason, and Lions coach Dan Campbell seemed to suggest after the game that both sides might be best off moving on.

    “How much development do you believe there is?’ Campbell said. ‘We’re talking about Hooker right now, how much development do you believe there still is? Sometimes, does the player need a change of scenery?”

    Buccaneers roster cuts: Another key undrafted rookie dismissed

    Shilo Sanders isn’t the only notable undrafted rookie whom the Tampa Bay Buccaneers won’t be keeping on their 53-man roster.

    The team decided to release linebacker Nick Jackson, according to multiple reports.

    Jackson, who finished his college career at Iowa after transferring from Virginia, was a preseason standout who led the team in tackles (14) while adding two sacks and an interception. But even with the team parting with Anthony Walker Jr., who was recovering a lower left leg injury, Tampa Bay saw fit to turn to other options at inside linebacker. Jackson, however, could be a candidate for the practice squad if he goes unclaimed.

    Titans roster cuts: 16 players sent packing

    On Monday, the team parted ways with 16 players. Those who were waived included: WR Jha’Quan Jackson, WR TJ Sheffield, DT Josiah Bronson, DT TJ Smith, OLB Desmond Evans, ILB Amari Burney, CB Jalen Kimber, CB Clarence Lewis, CB Jermari Harris, CB Davion Ross, S Julius Wood, S Joshuah Bledsoe. Tennessee also released DE Joe Gaziano, G Arlington Hambright and C Sam Mustipher and waived WR Matt Landers with an injury designation.

    Saints roster cuts: Cam Akers among 14 players dropped early

    Cam Akers’ stint with the New Orleans Saints was a short one.

    The running back was released Monday, Saints coach Kellen Moore confirmed. The team also waived 13 other players: punter James Burnip, wide receivers Roderick Daniels Jr. and Moochie Dixon, defensive ends Jasheen Davis, Jeremiah Martin and Omari Thomas, offensive tackles Josiah Ezirim and Jonathan Mendoza, tight ends Seth Green and Michael Jacobson, offensive guards Kyle Hergel and Mike Panasiuk, and linebacker Tyreem Powell.

    Akers, 26, signed a one-year deal with the Saints in June after a minicamp tryout. But with New Orleans having sufficient depth behind Alvin Kamara with Kendre Miller, sixth-round rookie Devin Neal and Clyde Edwards-Helaire, the team opted to move on.

    Eagles roster cuts: Former first-round pick waived

    Kenyon Green won’t be a part of the Philadelphia Eagles’ adjusted offensive line after all.

    The offensive guard was waived Monday, according to CBS Sports, just five months after he was traded to the team by the Houston Texans in exchange for safety C.J. Gardner-Johnson.

    Green, 24, was the No. 15 overall pick by the Texans in the 2022 NFL draft out of Texas A&M, but the 6-4, 323-pound blocker struggled throughout his tenure in Houston.

    Eagles executive vice president and general manager Howie Roseman was busy over the weekend reshuffling the backups for his offensive front, sending offensive guard Darian Kinnard to the Green Bay Packers while also acquiring offensive tackle Fred Johnson in a deal with the Jacksonville Jaguars.

    Dolphins roster cuts: CB Mike Hilton released

    The team is releasing Mike Hilton, the cornerback’s agents told ESPN.

    Hilton, 31, was signed to boost depth in the slot after Kader Kohou, the lone returning starter in the secondary, suffered a torn Anterior cruciate ligament. A longtime standout for both the Pittsburgh Steelers and Cincinnati Bengals, he collected 13 interceptions in the last eight years, during which he also started 56 games.

    Fifth-round rookie Jason Marshall Jr. now could be in line to take over the nickel role.

    Offensive tackle Jalen McKenzie was also waived, according to ESPN.

    Lions roster cuts: QB clarity coming?

    Dan Campbell and Brad Holmes don’t expect to keep any Detroit Lions players twisting in the wind, as the team plans to make the bulk of its cuts by end of day Monday.

    ‘There could be a couple that we don’t get to, maybe last minute tomorrow,’ Campbell said Monday. ‘But that is what it is and it’s – there’s nothing easy about it and it’s worse on them than it is us. I mean, it’s hard on us but there’s no woe-is-me here. I feel sorry for those guys, but at the same token, what I would tell them, man, use this as fuel and move onto the next step of this.’

    The spot most closely monitored for Detroit is at backup quarterback, where journeyman Kyle Allen appears to have taken a lead on Hendon Hooker, the 2023 third-round draft pick who has played sparingly and struggled this summer. After the preseason finale, Campbell appeared to leave the door open to the team moving on from Hooker in some form.

    “How much development do you believe there is?’ Campbell said. ‘We’re talking about Hooker right now, how much development do you believe there still is? Sometimes, does the player need a change of scenery?”

    Cowboys roster cuts: A surprise in store?

    First-year Dallas Cowboys coach Brian Schottenheimer created the kind of stir that bossman Jerry Jones would appreciate when he suggested last week that the team could throw a curveball or two come cutdown time.

    ‘We’ll sit down after we play Friday and we’ll make some decisions about the entire roster,’ Schottenheimer said last Monday. ‘There will probably be some surprises from some of the mock things that are out there in terms of, ‘Hey, I thought for sure this guy was gonna make it.”

    There don’t appear to be many mysteries for a team that sat a huge number of starters and key contributors in the finale, though embattled 2023 first-round defensive tackle Mazi Smith among those still in action. Schottenheimer said Saturday that the positions giving Dallas’ decision-makers the most trouble were cornerback, wide receiver, linebacker and defensive end.

    No surprise here, though: Offensive tackle La’el Collins, a former linchpin of the offensive line who signed with the team just this month, was cut Sunday, per multiple reports.

    Eagles roster cuts: Dorian Thompson-Robinson out as QB shuffle continues

    Howie Roseman is never one to stand pat at a key moment for roster building. That aggressive mentality was on full display this weekend, as the executive vice president and general manager of the Philadelphia Eagles executed a slew of moves.

    The most notable decision might be the reworking of his quarterback room. With backup Tanner McKee still sidelined by a finger injury, Roseman swung a trade with the Minnesota Vikings to acquire Sam Howell. That led Sunday to the official ouster of Thompson-Robinson, who was acquired in the Kenny Pickett trade but looked unlikely to stick around after battling sixth-round rookie Kyle McCord for the presumed No. 3 job. McCord, however, was also released on Monday, per reports.

    Buccaneers roster cuts: Shilo Sanders gets the boot, but could he return?

    Shilo Sanders went down fighting – literally – in Tampa. The Buccaneers on Sunday waived the undrafted rookie free agent safety from Colorado, just one day after Sanders was ejected from Saturday’s preseason finale against the Buffalo Bills for throwing a punch against tight end Zach Davidson.

    Buccaneers coach Todd Bowles made his stance clear on Sanders’ action, calling it ‘inexcusable’ in his postgame remarks. But Bowles has been largely complementary of the young defensive back, leaving open the question of whether he could land back on the Bucs’ practice squad if he goes unclaimed.

    ‘Shilo is very aggressive, very young, and very hungry,’ Bowles said last week. ‘He can make plays in the box and run down to give us 100% on special teams.’

    Browns roster cuts: Tyler Huntley out, but four-QB approach seems to be a go

    The Cleveland Browns are never short on quarterback news.

    On Sunday, the team announced it had released Tyler Huntley, along with three other veterans and 17 players who were waived.

    Yet things appear to be clear for the Browns to keep their quartet of quarterbacks – starter Joe Flacco, veteran Kenny Pickett and rookies Dillon Gabriel and Shedeur Sanders – on the 53-man roster, with general manager Andrew Berry indicating as much during his team’s preseason finale against the Los Angeles Rams.

    ‘Honestly, it’s not much of a decision for us,’ Berry told Chris Rose and Joe Thomas on the Browns’ broadcast, per the Akron Beacon Journal.

    Jets roster cuts: Former first-rounder dropped

    Linebacker Jamin Davis’ attempt to revive his NFL career has hit another snag. The 2021 first-round pick of the Washington Commanders was released by the Jets on Sunday.

    Davis, who re-signed with New York in March after being claimed on waivers by the team last December, wasn’t able to latch on with Aaron Glenn and Co. despite some promising flashes over the summer.

    The Jets also waived six other players on Sunday: QB Adrian Martinez, DE Michael Fletcher, OT Liam Forandel, TE Zack Kuntz, DB Tanner McCalister and RB Lawrance Toafili. Six more were waived Saturday: CB Mario Goodrich, OT Samuel Jackson, TE Neal Johnson, WR Dymere Miller, DT Fatorma Mullbah and WR Ontaria ‘Pokey’ Wilson.

    Falcons roster cuts: Atlanta moves on from DL Morgan Fox five months after deal

    The Atlanta Falcons are parting ways with 12 players, including one who might come as a surprise to many.

    Defensive lineman Morgan Fox was released Saturday despite having $3 million guaranteed in the two-year deal he signed with the team this offseason.

    Rams roster cuts: Eleven players sent packing

    Count the Los Angeles Rams among the teams not waiting until Tuesday to get started making cuts.

    The team on Sunday announced it was releasing linebacker Tony Fields II and waiving 10 others.

    When is the NFL roster cut deadline?

    By 4 p.m. ET on Tuesday, Aug. 26, all 32 teams must reduce their active rosters to 53 players. Official word for some teams’ moves, however, might not come until slightly later.

    What happens once the NFL roster deadline passes?

    NFL teams have until noon ET on Wednesday, Aug. 27, to claim players who are waived as part of league-wide roster reductions. Once those claims are resolved, clubs will begin filling out their practice squads.

    This post appeared first on USA TODAY

    When the clock starts ticking during fantasy football drafts, it’s best to move forward with caution.

    While much of the focus is on finding the best sleepers, it’s also prudent to be aware of potential busts.

    Tight ends aren’t often considered a highly valued position. In 2025, only three players are being selected inside the top 50 of fantasy drafts, according to FantasyPros’ average draft position (ADP). That said, these three tight ends are being drafted as starters in the majority of leagues, but could fail to meet expectations.

    2025 FANTASY FOOTBALL SLEEPERS: QB | RB | WR | TE | K

    2025 POSITION RANKINGS: QB | RB | WR | TE | K | D/ST | Overall

    TE busts to fade in fantasy football 2025

    Travis Kelce, Kansas City Chiefs

    The veteran tight end has been a staple in fantasy lineups for over a decade, but it’s time to start fading him at his current ADP. He had declining production in 2024 and still managed to finish as TE6 in PPR points per game. He was the third-most targeted tight end in the NFL with 133 targets and led the position in red-zone targets (26). So why fade the soon-to-be 36-year-old in 2025?

    It’s not a complete fade but it’s probably better to treat Kelce as a borderline TE1 than a sure-fire stud at this stage. Only one tight end in NFL history has finished with more than 90 catches at the age of 36 or older (Tony Gonzalez, 2012).

    Kelce’s yards per route run and yards after the catch both declined in each of the last three seasons. The biggest question mark surrounding Kelce heading into 2025 is the availability of wide receiver Rashee Rice. With Rice healthy, Kelce averaged just four targets per game. However, following Rice’s season-ending knee injury, Kelce averaged over nine targets per game. There’s a chance Rice could miss half of the season due to a suspension, but there’s also a chance Rice only misses a couple of games. Kelce’s usage hinges largely on Rice’s presence and the risk at taking him as the TE5 outweighs the production at this stage.

    Evan Engram, Denver Broncos

    This potential bust could backfire if Engram were to surprise and lead his new team in targets in 2025. However, the likelihood of that happening is slim because he is coming off his worst season and a torn labrum, which required surgery.

    Engram joined the Broncos in free agency, and some are excited about his potential in Sean Payton’s offense. But Payton – who has been a head coach for 18 NFL seasons – has only had a tight end finish inside the top 10 in PPR five times. Those being seasons from Jimmy Graham (2011, 2013, 2014), Ben Watson (2015) and Jared Cook (2019).

    The soon-to-be 31-year-old has relied heavily on volume more than explosiveness and touchdowns. He has failed to find the end zone more than four times in a season since 2017. He’ll play second fiddle to Courtland Sutton. Engram could even potentially finish third on the team in targets behind third-year breakout candidate Marvin Mims Jr. Expectations should be tempered for Engram at his current TE8 ADP.

    Colston Loveland, Chicago Bears

    It’s challenging to fall in love with Loveland and trust him to finish inside fantasy football’s top 15 tight ends in 2025.

    The rookie is a terrific prospect in a Bears offense that is expected to improve. New head coach Ben Johnson is calling the shots and he was the offensive coordinator in Detroit when Sam LaPorta finished as TE1 overall as a rookie in 2023. The issue for Loveland is that there are plenty of mouths to feed as Chicago loaded up on offense in the offseason. The presence of wide receivers DJ Moore, Rome Odunze and Luther Burden, along with veteran tight end Cole Kmet will likely keep the rookie from Michigan in deep TE2 range all season.

    It’s unlikely Loveland can make a significant mark in such a crowded room but he’s still a worthwhile pick in dynasty leagues. He has top-10 draft capital and will likely grow in the Bears offense in the coming years, but don’t expect him to be elite in 2025.

    This post appeared first on USA TODAY

    From American Eagle to Swatch, brands appear to be making a lot of blunders lately.

    When actress Sydney Sweeney’s jeans campaign came out last month, critics lambasted the wordplay of good “jeans” and “genes” as tone deaf with nefarious undertones.

    More recently, an advert from Swiss watchmaker Swatch sparked backlash for featuring an Asian model pulling the corners of his eyes, in an offensive gesture.

    Colgate-Palmolive’s ad for Sanex shower gel was banned in the U.K. for problematic suggestions about Black and white skin tones. And consumers derided Cracker Barrel’s decision to ditch its overalls-clad character for a more simplistic text-based logo as “sterile,” “soulless,” and “woke.”

    The new Cracker Barrel logo.Wyatte Grantham-Philips / AP

    Meanwhile, recent product launches from Adidas and Prada have raised allegations of cultural appropriation.

    That has reignited the debate about when an ad campaign is effective and when it’s just plain offensive, as companies confront increased consumer scrutiny.

    “Each brand had its own blind spot,” David Brier, brand specialist and author of “Brand intervention” and “Rich brand, poor brand” told CNBC via email.

    He noted, however, that too many brands are attempting to respond to consumers with an outdated playbook.

    “Modern brands are trying to navigate cultural complexity with corporate simplicity. They’re using 1950s boardroom thinking to solve 2025 human problems,” he continued.

    “These aren’t sensitivity failures. They’re empathy failures. They viewed culture as something to navigate around rather than understand deeply.”

    Some companies have had success in tapping into the zeitgeist — and, in some cases, seizing on other brands’ shortcomings.

    Gap, for instance, this week sought to counter backlash against Sweeney’s advertisement with a campaign in which pop group Katseye lead a diverse group of dancers performing in denim against a white backdrop.

    Brier said companies should consider how they can genuinely connect with consumers and be representative, rather than simply trying to avoid offense.

    “No brand can afford to fake understanding. No brand can ‘committee its way’ to connection. No brand can focus-group its way to authenticity. In 2025, customers can smell the difference from a mile away,” he added.

    Nevertheless, ads are meant to spark conversation, and at a time when grabbing and maintaining consumers’ attention — and share of wallet — is increasingly difficult, brands have a fine balance to tread.

    “Brands live and die by standing out and grabbing attention. On top of that, iconic and culturally relevant brands want to stand for something and be recognized for it. Those are tough asks,” Jonathan A.J. Wilson, professor of brand strategy and culture at Regent’s University London.

    In an age of social media and with ever more divided public opinions, landing one universal message can be difficult, Wilson noted. For as long as that remains the case, some brands may still see value in taking a calculated risk.

    “It’s hard to land one universal message, and even if you try and tailor your message to various groups, others are watching,” he said.

    “Controversy grabs attention and puts you at the front of people’s minds. It splits crowds and forces people to have a decision when otherwise they probably wouldn’t care. That can lead to disproportionate publicity, which could be converted into sales.”

    This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

    Summer camp: It’s for munching on s’mores, seizing victory in tug-of-war and making lifelong friends.

    For this group of successful businesswomen, though, it’s also about trading tactical advice about managing boards of directors and selling companies. And fighting to get a piece of an investment world dominated by men.

    Welcome to Camp Female Founders Fund, a coastal oasis in Montauk, New York, on eastern Long Island, where female business leaders broaden their networks, share their struggles and triumphs and have some fun.

    This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

    Keurig Dr Pepper said Monday it will buy Peet’s Coffee owner JDE Peet’s in a deal worth about $18 billion (15.7 billion euro).

    When the acquisition is complete, the company plans to split into two separate companies, one focused on coffee and the other focused on beverages including Dr Pepper, Canada Dry, 7Up and energy drinks.

    The coffee business will have about $16 billion in combined sales and the beverage business about $11 billion.

    “Through the complementary combination of Keurig and JDE Peet’s, we are seizing an exceptional opportunity to create a global coffee giant,” said Tim Cofer, Keurig Dr Pepper’s CEO.

    In addition to Peet’s, Amsterdam-based JDE Peet’s brands include L’OR, Jacobs, Douwe Egberts, Kenco, Pilao, OldTown, Super and Moccona.

    Once the two companies are separated, Cofer will become CEO of the beverage business, which will be based in Frisco, Texas, and Keurig Dr Pepper CFO Sudhanshu Priyadarshi will lead the coffee business, which will be located in Burlington, Mass., with its international headquarters in Amsterdam.

    This post appeared first on NBC NEWS