Author

admin

Browsing

The silver price remains historically high despite a recent pullback, and many silver stocks haven’t kept pace.

Silver’s strong performance over the past year is the result of a perfect storm of factors, including an entrenched supply deficit, growing industrial demand, a weakening US dollar and deepening geopolitical and economic uncertainty.

For these reasons, investors are flocking to silver for both its safe-haven status and its developing role as a critical metal in energy, artificial intelligence and defense technologies.

As of early February, the silver price was trading in a range of US$70 to US$80 per ounce, while the Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (ARCA:SILJ) was trading between about US$31 to US$32 per share.

SILJ tracks small-cap and mid-cap producers, developers and explorers that derive most of their revenue from silver. The profit margins of this segment of the silver-mining industry are the most sensitive to rising silver prices, hence SILJ tends to outperform the price of physical silver during bull markets.

Why is there a lag between the silver price and silver stocks?

During a presentation at the Vancouver Resource Investment Conference (VRIC), held from January 25 to 26, Peter Krauth, editor of Silver Stock Investor and Silver Advisor, looked at the performance of silver stocks relative to the price of physical silver, honing in on the silver-mining exchange-traded funds.

‘So we actually have had negative leverage in silver stocks versus silver. If you look back over one year, two years, we’re essentially even. You’ve gotten no reward for taking on additional risk by being in the silver stocks.’

Why are silver stocks, particularly those on the SILJ, lagging behind the performance of the physical metal?

Krauth explained that valuation models for these stocks are still factoring in silver prices at US$25 to US$30, even though last quarter the price was averaging around US$70 per ounce. “They essentially almost all need to be revalued because silver is so much higher, and that hasn’t happened yet,” he said.

“I think they’re going to have to redo their calculations for gold and silver miners.”

“That caps their earnings. Well, the good news for speculators, investors and mining stocks is that those hedges expire,” said Penny, who believes that the relative outperformance of the silver stocks to the silver price will “kick in soon.’

When will silver stocks catch up to the silver price?

Penny is looking for those hedges to expire over the first few quarters of the year.

“Then that’s where these mining stocks, the profits are just going to go through the roof. I mean, even if we pull back to the mid US$60s — not expecting that — but even if that were to happen, these mining stocks are not pricing in US$60 silver. They’re still pricing in sub-US$50 silver. So a lot of upside potential here for the mining stocks,” he said.

Barton is also looking for a move sooner rather than later, especially with earning calls coming up.

“I think we have a catch-up trade coming. I think it’s coming soon. So if no one has taken advantage of this yet, I think you need to act like now,” said Barton, who later added, “Assuming the silver price could stay above, you know, US$75 an ounce or so, that should blow out expectations. And I think it’ll be a really nice trade. I really do.”

But that won’t be the end of the party for silver. Krauth sees strong potential over the next two or three years for a “dramatic run” for the silver sector. And like his peers, he sees that run starting soon.

“I think what we’re going to see is over the next few quarters, as those projects, producers, cashflows, get revalued at higher input prices, we’re going to see the profit margins really explode and expand,” he said. “We’re going to see when those numbers get reported, the market is going to start to appreciate that and start to re-rate a lot of these stocks.”

Rick’s rules for silver sector profits

Rick Rule, investment guru and proprietor at Rule Investment Media, is already making plays in this latest silver bull market, leveraging the profits he’s made in physical silver to better position himself for the next stage.

“My reasoning being as follows: if silver goes nowhere for a year, if it stays rangebound, the best silver producers are discounting US$45 silver a year from now, if the price is at US$75 or US$80 they’ll be discounting US$75 or US$80 silver, which means the stock will be up 50, 60, 70 percent,” he explained.

“The speculative outlook for the silver stocks seemed to be better than the speculative outcome for silver. If silver stays flat for a year, by definition, silver won’t give me any return. But if it stays flat, the silver stocks would give me 50 or 60 percent so it was a better speculative outcome,’ Rule added.

What did he do with the rest of his gains from his physical silver investment? He parked 25 percent in physical gold. “That’s how I save. I maintain liquidity in US currency, and I save in gold,” said Rule.

The other 25 percent went into oil and gas stocks. “As you know, my motto is that I buy hate and I sell love. Silver was loved, so I sold it. Oil and gas were hated, so I bought it.”

Both Krauth and Barton are on board with Rick’s Rules for silver investment.

“(Rule) has had for a long time a significant position in physical silver, and has sold a good portion of that because he is looking for value all the time and not sitting still. And he decided that those proceeds were going to go to where he saw value,” said Krauth. “And that’s part of my thesis going forward as well — that the value, or the unrealized value, in the silver space is now, especially in the miners.”

Barton also sees value in this strategy. “I have been selling some physical silver, and I’ve been putting it into oil stocks, and I’ve been putting it into gold and silver miners because they have not played that catch-up trade, right?,” he said. “Spot gold and silver are relatively expensive compared to very good silver and very good gold miners. So that could be a place where you could take some profits and rotate into the next leg up.”

Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

The energy revolution is here to stay, and electric vehicles (EVs) have become part of the mainstream narrative.

The shift toward green energy is gathering momentum, with governments adding more incentives to accelerate this transition. Increasing EV sales are good news for battery metals investors, as EVs are significant drivers for commodities such as lithium, cobalt and graphite, key components in the cathodes of EV batteries. Additionally, interest in EV options outside of Tesla is heating up, and Chinese EVs are increasing in popularity outside of the country.

Read on to learn about the top US and Chinese EV stocks, and the batteries and battery suppliers they’re using for their current and upcoming models.

1. Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA)

Market cap: US$1.62 trillion

First on the list is EV maker Tesla, which has brought significant attention to the EV narrative.

The company’s story starts in 2003, when it was founded by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning. Elon Musk invested in the company in 2004, becoming the largest shareholder, and eventually became its CEO in 2008. A well-known story for battery metals investors, the company made headlines in 2014 when it broke ground at its first gigafactory in Nevada, US, an unthinkable proposition at the time.

Outside of the US, Tesla also has gigafactories in China and Germany. Tesla’s massive Shanghai Gigafactory was the company’s first auto plant outside of the United States. The company produces Model 3s and Model Ys for China and global export.

Tesla uses a range of different lithium-ion batteries in its models. In partnership with Panasonic (TSE:6752), at its Nevada gigafactory Tesla produces batteries with nickel-cobalt-aluminum (NCA) cathodes — different from most of Tesla’s competitors, which use a nickel-cobalt-manganese (NCM) mix.

Tesla announced in 2021 that it was changing the battery chemistry for its standard-range vehicles to lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) cathodes, which are cobalt- and nickel-free. China’s largest battery maker, CATL (SZSE:300750), is a key supplier of LFP batteries for Tesla, particularly for the Shanghai and Berlin gigafactories.

Changes in US tariffs on EVs made or sourced in China have impacted Tesla’s business, leading the company to try diversifying its supply chain. Last year, South Korea’s LG Energy Solution (KRX:373220) signed a US$4.3 billion deal to supply Tesla with LFP batteries from its factory in Michigan, US, starting in 2027.

On the other hand, Tesla’s prime EV position got a boost in the first quarter of 2026 Canada announced it would allow imports of up to 49,000 Chinese-made EVs per year, and lowered tariffs on them from 100 to 6.1 percent. Half of that quota could apply to Tesla’s EVs made in Shanghai, while the other half is dedicated to EVs priced under C$35,000.

Image via Tesla.

2. BYD Company (OTCPK:BYDDY,HKEX:1211)

Market cap: US$116 billion

Leading Chinese EV maker BYD Company was founded in 1995 and is a top producer of several kinds of rechargeable batteries, including nickel-metal hydride batteries and NCM batteries. BYD has a vertically integrated supply chain, from mineral battery cells to battery packs.

Backed by Warren Buffett, in 2020 BYD officially launched its Blade battery, a less bulky LFP battery. The following year, the company announced that it would use the Blade LFP batteries for all of its pure electric models.

In April 2025, BYD released two new EV models, the Han L sedan and Tang L SUV, based on its new Super e-platform, which allows users to add 400 kilometers (248 miles) of range in five minutes of charging, and charge to 100 percent in 20 minutes.

BYD’s range of models include low-cost options such as the Seagull and Dolphin. Because of this, the company stands to benefit from Canada’s decision to allow imports and slash tariffs for up to 49,000 Chinese EVs per year, half of which must be under C$35,000.

For the first time, in 2025, BYD overtook Tesla as the world’s biggest EV seller in terms of annual sales. BYD sold 2.25 million units for the year, up 28 percent over 2024, compared to the 1.64 million units sold by Tesla in 2025, down 9 percent from the previous year.

Image via BYD.

3. Rivian Automotive (NASDAQ:RIVN)

Market cap: US$18.08 billion

Founded in 2009 in Florida, US, Rivian designs, develops and manufactures EVs and accessories and sells them directly to customers in the consumer and commercial markets.

The US company is based in Irvine, California, and manufactures its vehicles in Illinois.

The carmaker announced plans to use cells made with LFP chemistries for its standard-level vehicles in 2022, and in 2023 announced plans to switch its entire lineup to this type of battery. South Korea’s Samsung SDI (KRX:006400) and LG Energy Solutions are Rivian’s current battery suppliers.

Last year, the company revealed e-scooters to market through its spinoff electric micromobility company named Also. The scooters are expected to hit the market in mid-2026. It has plans to launch a three-wheel EV line as well.

In early January 2026, Rivian reached a major milestone toward full-scale production of its new R2 with the manufacturing of validation builds at its plant in Illinois. This latest reiteration will be priced starting at US$45,000, with first deliveries slated for the first half of this year. Rivian sold 42,247 EVs in 2025.

Image via Rivian.

4. XPeng (NYSE:XPEV)

Market cap: US$17.49 billion

Xpeng is a Chinese EV maker focused on smart EVs. The company’s main manufacturing plant is located in Guangdong province.

Xpeng now uses LFP batteries for 99 percent of its EV lineup. CALB (HKEX:3931) is Xpeng’s largest battery supplier, and its other suppliers include CATL, BYD, Sunwoda Electronic (SZSE:300207) and EVE Energy (SZSE:300014).

Last year, the company showcased its 2025 XPENG X9 flagship vehicle, with self-driving capabilities powered by Xpeng’s self-developed Turing AI chip. At the same time, Xpeng unveiled its AEROHT Land Aircraft Carrier, slated for mass production in 2026. The company bills it as ‘the world’s first modular flying car.’

XPeng’s 2025 EV sales reached 429,445 units. The company has ambitious goals for 2026, aiming to sell between 550,000 and 600,000 EVs during the year. XPeng is launching four new SUV models this year: the XPeng G01 and XPeng G02, as well as two models from the Mona series, the D02 and D03.

Image via Xpeng.

5. Li Auto (NASDAQ:LI)

Market cap: US$17.03 billion

Li Auto bills itself as a pioneer in successfully commercializing extended-range EVs in China, and is a leader in China’s full-size and large SUV markets. The company started volume production of its first model, Li ONE, in November 2019, and launched its initial public offering in July 2020, raising US$1.1 billion.

Li Auto has battery supply agreements with CATL, Sunwoda Electronic and SVOLT Energy Technology.

One of the main differences between Li Auto and the other companies on this list is that Li Auto’s models allow battery pack charging with electricity or gas. The company calls this design extended-range EV technology.

Li Auto launched its first all-electric car, Li MEGA MPV, in 2024. In 2025, the company followed that with its second all-electric vehicle, the i8 SUV, which uses an NMC battery and maxes out at 536 horsepower. Li Auto also broadened its markets last year, launching three core models (Li L9, Li L7 and Li L6) in Egypt, Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan.

Li Auto achieved a significant milestone in 2025, with annual sales surpassing 1.5 million units. This made it “the first among China’s new EV startups to reach that mark,” according to the company’s Chairman and CEO Li Xiang.

Image via Li Auto.

6. NIO (NYSE:NIO)

Market cap: US$10.36 billion

Founded in 2014, Chinese EV maker NIO designs, jointly manufactures and sells smart and connected premium EVs.

NIO’s strategy includes its battery-as-a-service endeavor, a subscription purchasing model where buyers lease vehicle batteries. The company says the idea behind this move is to reduce vehicle costs. The service is run by a battery asset company, with NIO and leading battery maker CATL owning a stake. CATL is already NIO’s sole battery supplier.

The company has built battery swap stations that allow drivers with low batteries to pull up and have it swapped for a full battery within minutes. Its fifth generation swap stations are expected to roll out starting in 2026.

In September 2021, the company introduced a standard-range hybrid-cell battery that combines NCM and LFP cells. NIO is also offering the world’s longest-range semi-solid-state battery on a rental basis through its partnership with Beijing WeLion New Energy Technology.

In 2024, NIO launched its newest EV brand, Firefly, in China. The first model in this brand is a small car for city dwellers who struggle with finding convenient parking, as it can locate available spots and use parking assist to maneuver into them. Drivers are also be able to access the above-mentioned battery swap program.

NIO reported 2025 vehicle sales of 326,028 units, an increase of 46.9 percent year-over-year. Launched in September 2025, its flagship ES8 SUV became the fastest-selling EV in China in its price category by the end of the year. The company plans to bring three new large SUV models to the market in 2026, and expand into Australia and New Zealand in the second half of the year.

Image via Nio Newsroom.

7. VinFast Auto (NASDAQ:VFS)

Market cap: US$7.72 billion

VinFast Auto, Vietnam’s first global automotive manufacturer, is a multinational EV manufacturer producing both affordable and luxury EVs. The company’s lineup also includes an electric pickup truck known as the VF Wild.

VinFast has showrooms and service centers in North America, including in 14 US states and the Canadian provinces of Ontario, British Columbia and Québec.

Vietnam is the EV maker’s largest market, and it significantly expanded its footprint in Asia in 2025, adding numerous showrooms in the Philippines, Indonesia and India. Last year, the company brought a new manufacturing facility online in India and opened its first Indonesian assembly plant in December. It is scheduled to scale up production and launch new models, including electric two-wheelers, in 2026.

Image via VinFast.

8. Zhejiang Leapmotor Technology (OTC Pink:ZJLMF,HKEX:9863)

Market cap: US$7.58 billion

The Leapmotor brand first launched in China in 2017. The EV manufacturer designs and supplies its own battery packs for its vehicles.

Major auto maker Stellantis (NYSE:STLA) became a 20 percent shareholder in late 2023. The following year, the two entities formed the 51/49 joint venture company Leapmotor International, in which Stellantis holds the controlling interest. The joint venture is focused on selling and manufacturing Leapmotor vehicles outside of China.

The company’s current models in the market include seven seater SUV C16, mid-size crossover SUV C10, smart electric SUV C11, smart-tech C11 SUV, compact SUV B10, the new B01 sedan and T03 city EV.

Leapmotor unveiled its B01 electric sedan in April 2025. The vehicle is powered by LFP batteries from Gotion High-tech, CALB and Zenergy.

At the 2026 Brussels Motor Show, Leapmotor showcased the three EVs it has launched in Europe since expanding into the market: the B03X compact electric SUV, the B05 hatchback and the B10 range-extended electric vehicle.

Image via Wikimedia Commons.

9. Lucid Group (NASDAQ:LCID)

Market cap: US$3.59 billion

Headquartered in California, Lucid Group was founded in 2007 and produces luxury electric cars. The company’s first car, Lucid Air, is a state-of-the-art luxury sedan that is being produced at its US factory in Casa Grande, Arizona.

In April 2025, Lucid announced the acquisition of select Arizona-based facilities and assets of battery and fuel-cell EV company Nikola Corporation.

Lucid Motors uses high-performance Panasonic battery cells for its long-range electric vehicles. These cells are currently manufactured in Japan, but the company is transitioning to using batteries from Panasonic’s new facility in Kansas by mid-2026 to avoid Trump’s import tariffs.

Lucid plans to launch a full-scale manufacturing facility in Saudi Arabia in 2026, with an annual capacity of 150,000 vehicles by 2029.

The company’s Gravity SUV was named Esquire’s 2026 Car of the Year.

Image via Lucid.

10. Polestar Automotive (NASDAQ:PSNY)

Market cap: US$1.41 billion

Sweden-based electric performance car brand Polestar is owned by Geely Automobile Holdings (OTC Pink:GELYF,HKEX:80175). Up until early 2024, Volvo Cars was also a part owner, but it decided to hand Polestar entirely over to Geely to operate as an independent brand, attributing the move to slowing global demand for EVs.

Polestar’s current lineup includes the five door liftback Polestar 2, the luxury performance Polestar 3 SUV, the Polestar 4 compact coupe SUV and the Polestar 5 performance sedan, the last of which was released in 2025. The company is also planning the Polestar 7 compact SUV and the Polestar 6 roadster.

Polestar has experienced some difficulties in the last couple years, including software challenges in 2023 that caused delays in the rollout of the Polestar 3. In 2024, the company recorded a 15 percent drop in deliveries.

The EV maker’s bad luck seems to be turning around in 2025. Polestar sold a record 60,119 vehicles during the year, a 34 percent improvement over 2024.

This is in part thanks to Polestar’s efforts to capitalize on Tesla’s struggles with Musk and its brand image. In February 2025, Polestar began offering Tesla owners in the US and Canada discounts of up to $20,000 on new leases of its models. Its Q1 2025 sales jumped 76 percent year over year.

Image via SlashGear.

Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

ILC Critical Minerals Ltd. (TSXV: ILC,OTC:ILHMF) (OTCQB: ILHMF) (FSE: IAH0) (‘ILC’ or the ‘Company’) is pleased to announce a non-brokered private placement (the ‘Offering’) of up to 100,000,000 common shares at CAD$0.025 per share to raise gross proceeds of up to CAD$2,500,000. There are no warrants attached to this placement.

Proceeds of the private placement will be used partly to enable the Company to invest in growing its Southern African and Canadian operations and partly for general working capital purposes. If ILC decides to exercise its option, the Company may use part of the proceeds to exercise the option to acquire Lepidico (Mauritius) Ltd. (‘Lepidico Mauritius’) with a final net amount payable of around CAD$450,000. Lepidico Mauritius owns 80% of the company in Namibia that owns the Karibib project.

A table showing approximate split of proceeds if the full CAD$2.5 million is raised is as follows :

Amount CAD$ Percentage
Final payment to acquire Lepidico Mauritius
(if option exercised)
450,000 18.0
Exploration expenditure in Namibia* and Canada 950,000 38.0
Non arms length parties – Management fees 440,000 17.6
Working Capital 660,000 26.4
Total 2,500,000 100.0

 

*Assumes Lepidico Mauritius option exercised

Payments to persons conducting Investor Relations activities are expected to be appreciably less than 10% of the gross proceeds of the Offering. Any such Investor Relations engagements will be filed with the TSX Venture Exchange (‘TSXV’), in accordance with their policies.

Closing of the Offering is subject to acceptance by the TSXV. All securities issued in connection with the Offering will be subject to a four-month hold period from the date of issuance under applicable Canadian securities laws. The Company may pay finders fees on a portion of the placement, as permitted by TSXV policies and applicable securities laws.

It is anticipated that some directors and insiders will participate in this Offering. The issue of shares (to the extent subscribed for by insiders) constitute ‘related party transactions’ pursuant to Multilateral Instrument 61-101 – Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions (‘MI 61-101’), as the subscribers include directors of the Company. The Company is exempt from the requirements to obtain a formal valuation or minority shareholder approval in connection with the shares in reliance on the exemptions contained in sections 5.5(a) and 5.7(1)(a) of MI 61-101, respectively, as the fair market value of the shares to be issued to directors and insiders does not exceed 25% of the Company’s market capitalization.

About ILC Critical Minerals Ltd.

ILC Critical Minerals Ltd., formerly International Lithium Corp., has exploration activities in Ontario, Canada, with intentions to expand into Southern Africa. It has projects at various stages, ranging from Definitive Feasibility Study at Karibib in Namibia (note that ILC currently has an option only and is treating this as historic information at this point and not a current resource for ILC) to Preliminary Economic Assessment at Raleigh Lake to Pre-Drilling at Wolf Ridge. The primary target metals in Canada are lithium, rubidium and copper. There are three projects (two in Ontario and one in Ireland) in which ILC has sold its share, but where the Company stands to receive future payments from either a resource milestone being achieved or from a Net Smelter Royalty. In Namibia the Karibib project contains lithium, rubidium and cesium.

While the world’s politicians remain divided on the future of the energy market’s historic dependence on oil and gas and on ‘Net Zero’, there is in any scenario an ever-increasing and significant demand for electricity driven by AI and data centres, and by a likely unstoppable momentum towards electric vehicles and grid-scale electricity storage. All of these contribute to rising demand for lithium, copper, and other metals. Rubidium is also a critical metal, strategic for high-precision clocks, space technology, and improving the performance of certain types of solar panels. ILC has seen the politically driven, increasingly urgent push by the USA, Canada, the EU, and other major economies to safeguard their supplies of critical minerals and to become more self-sufficient. The Company’s Canadian and Southern African projects, which contain lithium, rubidium, cesium and copper, are strategic in this regard.

The Company’s key mission for the next decade is to generate revenue for its shareholders from lithium, rubidium and other critical minerals while also contributing to the creation of a greener, cleaner planet and less polluted cities.

This includes optimizing the value of ILC’s existing projects in Canada as well as finding, exploring and developing projects that have the potential to become world-class deposits. The Company announced that it regards Southern Africa as a key strategic target market and, in addition to Namibia, it has applied for and hopes to receive EPOs in Zimbabwe. The board hopes to make further announcements on the portfolio developments over the next few weeks and months.

The Company’s interests in various projects now consist of the following, and in addition, the Company continues to seek other opportunities:

Name Metal Location Stage Area in Hectares Current Ownership Percentage Future Ownership % if options exercised and/or residual interest Operator or JV Partner
Raleigh Lake Lithium
Rubidium
Ontario Dec 2023 : PEA for Li completed Apr 2023 Maiden Resource Estimates for Li and Rb 32,900 100% 100% ILC
Rubicon + Helikon + Exclusive Prospecting Licence Lithium
Rubidium
Cesium
Karibib, Namibia 2021 : Feasibility Study completed for Li, Rb and Cs under JORC 29,500 0 % 80% Lepidico; ILC if option exercised
Firesteel Copper, Cobalt Ontario Initial Drilling 6,600 90% 90% ILC
Wolf Ridge Lithium Ontario Pre-Drilling 5,700 0% 100% ILC
Mavis Lake Lithium Ontario May 2023
Maiden Resource 
Estimate
2,600 0% 0%
(carries an extra earn-in payment of AUD$ 0.75 million if resource targets met)
Critical Resources Limited (ASX:CRR)
Avalonia Lithium Ireland Drilling 29,200 0% 0%
2.0% Net Smelter Royalty
GFL Intl Co Ltd. (owned by Ganfeng Lithium Group Co. Ltd)
Forgan/
Lucky Lakes
Lithium Ontario Drilling < 500 0% 0%
1.5% Net Smelter Royalty
Power Minerals Limited 
(ASX: PNN)

 

The Company’s primary strategic focus at this point is on the Raleigh Lake Project, comprising lithium and rubidium, and the Firesteel copper project in Canada, as well as obtaining EPOs and mineral claims in Zimbabwe. The Karibib projects in Namibia, including further development of the EPL there, will be a high priority if ILC decides to exercise its option and remain involved.

The Raleigh Lake Project now encompasses 32,900 hectares (329 square kilometres) of mineral claims in Ontario and represents ILC’s most significant project in Canada. To date, drilling has occurred on less than 1,000 hectares of the Company’s claims. A Preliminary Economic Assessment was published for ILC’s lithium at Raleigh Lake in December 2023, with a detailed economic analysis of ILC’s separate rubidium resource still pending. This showed, for the lithium only and not yet taking into account the rubidium, a Post-tax NPV of CAD$342.9 million and a Post-tax IRR of 44.3% p.a. This was based on a spodumene price of US$2,350 per tonne. As at February 2, 2026 the spot spodumene price was US$ 1,965 per tonne. Raleigh Lake is 100% owned by ILC, free from any encumbrances and royalties. The Raleigh Lake Project boasts excellent access to roads, rail, and utilities.

A continuing goal has been to remain a well-funded, strategically run company that turns ILC’s aspirations into reality. Following the disposal of the Mariana project in Argentina in 2021, the Mavis Lake project in Canada in 2022, and the Avalonia project in 2025, ILC has continued to generate sufficient cash inflows to advance its exploration projects.

With increasing demand for high-tech rechargeable batteries used in electric vehicles, energy storage, and portable electronics, lithium has been dubbed ‘the new oil’. It is a key part of a green, sustainable economy. By positioning itself on projects with significant resource potential and solid strategic partners, ILC aims to become a preferred lithium and critical minerals resource developer for investors and to continue building value for its shareholders throughout the 2020s, the decade of battery metals.

On behalf of the Company,

John Wisbey
Chairman and CEO
www.ilccm.com

For further information concerning this news release, please contact info@ilccm.com or ILC@yellowjerseypr.com, or telephone +1 236 358 9100

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

Except for statements of historical fact, this news release or other releases contain certain ‘forward-looking information’ within the meaning of applicable securities law. Forward-looking information or forward-looking statements in this or other news releases may include: the timing of completion of any offering and the amount to be raised, the likelihood or otherwise of the Company exercising its option on Lepidico Mauritius, the outcome of and issues around the arbitration involving Lepidico Namibia, the effect on results of anticipated production rates, the timing and/or anticipated results of drilling on the Karibib or Raleigh Lake or Firesteel or Wolf Ridge projects, expected commodity prices, the expectation of resource estimates, preliminary economic assessments, feasibility studies, lithium or rubidium or cesium or copper recoveries, modeling of capital and operating costs, results of studies utilizing various technologies at the company’s projects, the Company’s budgeted expenditures, government permits or approval for licences and licence renewals, future plans for expansion in Southern Africa and planned exploration work on its projects, increased value of shareholder investments in the Company, the potential from the Company’s third party earn-out or royalty arrangements, the future demand for lithium, rubidium, cesium and copper, and assumptions about ethical behaviour by our joint venture partners or shareholders in our projects or third party operators of projects or royalty partners. Such forward-looking information is based on assumptions and subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those discussed in the sections entitled ‘Risks’ and ‘Forward-Looking Statements’ in the interim and annual Management’s Discussion and Analysis which are available at www.sedarplus.ca. While management believes that the assumptions made are reasonable, there can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate. Should one or more of the risks, uncertainties or other factors materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in forward-looking information. Forward-looking information herein, and all subsequent written and oral forward-looking information are based on expectations, estimates and opinions of management on the dates they are made that, while considered reasonable by the Company as of the time of such statements, are subject to significant business, economic, legislative, and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. These estimates and assumptions may prove to be incorrect and are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. Except as required by law, the Company assumes no obligation to update forward-looking information should circumstances or management’s estimates or opinions change.

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO UNITED STATES NEWS WIRE SERVICES OR FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/282473

News Provided by TMX Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Questcorp Mining Inc. (CSE: QQQ,OTC:QQCMF) (OTCQB: QQCMF) (FSE: D910) (the ‘Company’ or ‘Questcorp’) has chosen Peter W. Walcott and Associates Limited of Coquitlam, BC to undertake the permitted 10 to 15 line km induced polarization (IP) survey at the Company’s 1,168 hectare North Island Copper project near Port Hardy on Vancouver Island, British Columbia.

The IP survey will concentrate on the historic Marisa Zone, a porphyry copper target last explored in the 1990’s. Surface sampling and a preliminary 12.3-line km IP survey identified an interesting chargeability anomaly that was followed up by a five-hole, 376.43 diamond drilling program. Two of the five holes hit interesting copper values including down hole intervals of 0.078% copper over 56.39 metres in DDH92-01 and 0.041% copper over 70.71 metres in DDH92-03 in an altered quartz diorite. Copper grades were increasing with depth in DDH92-03. The Company plans to follow up these historic results. Source: Geophysical and Diamond Drilling Report on the Marisa Property by G.J. Allen and P.G. Dasler dated 1992-Feb-29 for Great Western Gold Corporation.

‘As copper prices continue to climb due to demand and supply issues, the importance of the North Island Copper project increases,’ commented Questcorp President & CEO, Saf Dhillon. ‘We feel the 1992 preliminary drill results demand further exploration, especially with copper grades increasing with depth to the bottom of one of the historic drill holes. Our setting in the right rocks between the historic Island Copper Mine and NorthIsle Copper and Gold Inc. (CSE: NCX), further attests to the potential of Questcorp’s North Island Copper project.’

The 2026 IP survey will run lines at the same azimuth, spaced midway between the 1973 IP survey lines to tighten the coverage over the area. Walcott hopes to incorporate the historic IP with the 2026 data to generate new chargeability and resistivity subsurface elevation plans, along with the 2026 psuedosection lines. The plans and sections will be utilized to generate drill targets for a follow-up drill program. Walcott is expected to mobilize to the property mid-February, with completion anticipated prior to month end.

Questcorp cautions investors a Qualified Person has not verified the historical exploration data and further cautions the presence of copper mineralization on the NorthIsle Copper and Gold and the BHP properties is not necessarily indicative of similar mineralization on the North Island Copper property.

The technical content of this news release has been reviewed and approved by R. Tim Henneberry, P. Geo (BC), a Director of the Company and a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.

About Questcorp Mining Inc.

Questcorp is engaged in the business of the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties in North America, with the objective of locating and developing economic precious and base metal properties of merit. The Company holds an option to acquire an undivided 100-per-cent interest in and to mineral claims totalling 1,168.09 hectares comprising the North Island Copper property, on Vancouver Island, B.C., subject to a royalty obligation. The Company also holds an option to acquire an undivided 100-per-cent interest in and to mineral claims totalling 2,520.2 hectares comprising the La Union project located in Sonora, Mexico, subject to a royalty obligation.

Contact Information

Questcorp Mining Corp.
Saf Dhillon, President & CEO
Email: saf@questcorpmining.ca
Telephone: (604) 484-3031

This news release includes certain ‘forward-looking statements’ under applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable, are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause the actual results and future events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to: general business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties, uncertain capital markets; and delay or failure to receive board or regulatory approvals. There can be no assurance that the geophysical surveys will be completed as contemplated or at all and that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/282479

News Provided by TMX Newsfile via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

(TheNewswire)

Vancouver, British Columbia – February 3, 2026 ‑ TheNewswire Harvest Gold Corporation (TSXV: HVG,OTC:HVGDF) (‘Harvest Gold’ or the ‘Company’) announces that it has met the required exploration expenditure obligation of $1,250,000 through its 2025 exploration program in the Northern and Central portion of the Mosseau property, its flagship property in the Urban Barry Belt in Quebec’s Abitibi region.

Harvest Gold President and CEO, Rick Mark, states: ‘We have come a long way in the last 18 months and are now in an excellent position to meet our first ownership target of attaining 80% of Mosseau. That now requires only $1,500,000 in further exploration expenditures in the next two-year period with the same annual cash and share issuances. Importantly, for our shareholders to know, at that point we have the option to buy the last 20% of Mosseau for a $1,500,000 payment.’

The Mosseau property spans 147 claims totaling 7265.88 hectares (72.66 km2), which includes a 17.7 km long gold-bearing structure running through the length of the property. Mosseau adjoins the Urban Barry Greenstone Belt of the Abitibi Region of Quebec.

The Urban Barry property is located in the Ralleau and Wilson townships in the Eeyou Istchee James Bay/Abitibi region of Quebec.

About Harvest Gold Corporation

Harvest Gold is focused on exploring for near-surface gold deposits and copper-gold porphyry deposits in politically stable mining jurisdictions. Harvest Gold’s board of directors, management team and technical advisors have collective geological and financing experience exceeding 400 years.

Harvest Gold has three active gold projects focused in the Urban Barry area, totalling 377 claims covering 20,016.87 ha, located approximately 45-70 km west of Gold Fields Limited’s – Windfall Deposit (Figure 5).

Harvest Gold acknowledges that the Mosseau Gold Project straddles the Eeyou Istchee-James Bay and Abitibi territories.  Harvest Gold is committed to developing positive and mutually beneficial relationships based on respect and transparency with local Indigenous communities.

Harvest Gold’s three properties, Mosseau, Urban-Barry and LaBelle, together cover over 50 km of favorable strike along mineralized shear zones.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Rick Mark
President and CEO
Harvest Gold Corporation

For more information please contact:

Rick Mark or Jan Urata
@ 604.737.2303 or
info@harvestgoldcorp.com

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Forward Looking Information

This news release includes certain statements that may be deemed ‘forward looking statements’. All statements in this news release, other than statements of historical facts, that address events or developments that Harvest Gold expects to occur, are forward looking statements. Forward looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words ‘expects’, ‘plans’, ‘anticipates’, ‘believes’, ‘intends’, ‘estimates’, ‘projects’, ‘potential’ and similar expressions, or that events or conditions ‘will’, ‘would’, ‘may’, ‘could’ or ‘should’ occur.

Although the Company believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those in forward looking statements include market prices, exploitation and exploration successes, and continued availability of capital and financing, and general economic, market or business conditions. Investors are cautioned that any such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made. Except as required by securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements in the event that management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

Copyright (c) 2026 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.

News Provided by TheNewsWire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

  • A USA TODAY analysis found thousands of underage bettors are caught annually by legalized sportsbooks.
  • While sportsbooks file fraud reports with state regulators, consequences are rare, typically resulting only in a ban from the app.

Seventy-five dollars is all Sam needed for his next round of sports bets on his BetMGM app.

Well – it wasn’t officially his. He was 17 years old, and the legal gambling age in his home state of Arizona is 21. Sam used his mom’s ID behind her back to create the account where he’d bet on basketball and football games.

Except she found him out and reported him to the company.

BetMGM opened an investigation and found Sam had deposited $75 into the account with two ApplePay accounts. Investigators tracked his iPhone 13 to his home, but also the local high school where Sam had placed his bets. They banned the account and wrote up a report for state authorities.

But as soon as he was 21, Sam was back at it. Gambling on the apps again.

He’s just one of thousands of underage bettors caught annually by legalized sportsbooks like DraftKings and FanDuel. They collectively bet millions of dollars illegally, a new analysis shows. USA TODAY obtained and reviewed hundreds of the “suspected fraud reports” required by state regulators coast-to-coast to gauge the scale of the problem.

And while that oversight generates a mountain of paperwork documenting the fraud, virtually no one faces more serious consequences than a ban from the apps. Pending class action lawsuits alleged companies like DraftKings groom young men on their sites so they’re ready when they become 21.

Since the Supreme Court widely legalized sports wagering in 2018, the nation’s appetite for bets has flourished. U.S. bettors laid out about $160 billion in 2025 on sports, according to the outlet Legal Sports Report, creating revenue of about $16 billion. For perspective, an analyst pointed out Americans risked more on bets than they spend annually on movies, books, concerts and professional sports tickets — combined. On Feb. 8, Super Bowl 60 is anticipated to attract $1.7 billion in legal U.S. wagers.

The most coveted and lucrative market, young men 21-34, accounts for more than half of the bets placed on most sites. About 60% of those bettors place at least three bets per week.

Marketing for top sportsbooks floods the airwaves and casts a giant net for customers that critics say has lured high schoolers, college kids, as well as those legally allowed to bet. Experts worry watching sports has become conflated with betting the lines.

The underage fraud reports break into three buckets:

  • Parents claimed children as young as 1-year-old accessed their account and placed wagers. In those cases, sportsbooks usually refund bets and ban the users.
  • Underage bettors gain access using a relative’s account with or without their consent. This is the most common case of underage fraud.
  • Underage bettors use an entirely stolen identity to create and operate accounts – this includes serious examples of fraud with deceased individuals’ social security numbers.

The sportsbooks say they’re doing everything possible and have robust KYC, Know Your Customer protocols. And yet, kids and teens are finding loopholes and tricks.

Betting on sites like DraftKings represents just a piece of the overall sports wagering landscape that includes other illegal routes for kids like offshore websites and in-person bookies with no age verification. Savvy kids are also finding their way to crypto “sweepstakes” sites and emerging prediction platforms with little or no age requirements. 

Amount of youth wagering hard to pin down

The scale of underage betting is hard to measure. By one high-end estimate by McGill University, 60 to 80 percent of high schoolers gamble at least once in a given year with a smaller portion, less than 10% addicted or at-risk of developing a problem. 

What’s easier to measure: the amount of underage reports filed with state regulators, as required by most state laws. USA TODAY obtained the reports from ten states, including some from Missouri, where sports wagering just went live Dec. 1.

State regulators in other states said the reports are considered confidential or not required, obscuring the scale of the problem they’ve pledged to prevent.

In Iowa, 84 reports of underage betting were sent to the state’s Division of Criminal Investigation − but it’s unclear if any got charged.

In Tennessee, sportsbooks notified the state’s Sports Wagering Council of 105 underage account usages in 2024. Last year, that number more than quadrupled. The council refers more than half of the reports to local district attorneys, but most take no action.

In Massachusetts, the state’s gaming commission requires companies to present data on underage access quarterly in public meetings.

DraftKings reported more than 4,807 underage registration attempts stopped last year and suspended 243 accounts that had placed illegal wagers in the state. FanDuel reported 186 attempts stopped and 330 suspensions.

“We’ve got to figure this out because this isn’t getting any better, it’s getting worse,” Massachusetts’ Gaming Commission Chair Jordan Maynard said at a January meeting reaction to DraftKings’ report.

In Ohio, the state reports the dollar amounts associated with suspected underage accounts.

The Casino Control Commission told USA TODAY DraftKings by far had the most reports with 620, accounting for $2.78 million in wagers by suspected underage users since 2023. FanDuel had 162 underage reports, accounting for $63,152 in bets.

Both companies declined to answer questions about the total illegal amount wagered nationwide, but pointed out the suspended accounts would include the historical wagers on an account, so if it was illegally shared by an underage proxy better, it’s possible legal bets would be reported as well.

Underage bets also likely represent a tiny fraction of a company’s overall sportsbook handle, or wagers. But critics say DraftKings uses fantasy contests, legal at 18 in most places, to create a funnel to their lucrative 21-34 customer base. In the first nine months of 2025, DraftKings’ sportsbook reported $36.8 billion in bets, up 11% from the prior year.

‘DraftKings employs advanced Know Your Customer (KYC) technology trusted by the financial industry and law enforcement to verify the age and identity of our customers, in sharp contrast to predatory illegal and offshore operators,” said Stephen Miraglia a DraftKings spokesman. “Every sports wagering law and regulation establishes an age of eligibility, and DraftKings strictly adheres to these requirements in every jurisdiction in which we operate.”

FanDuel’s Cory Fox, senior vice president of public policy and sustainability, said the company has a “zero tolerance policy” for underage gambling and uses monitoring tools to identify misuse.

“When suspicious activity is detected, the company takes appropriate action, which can include restricting or closing accounts and reporting issues to law enforcement or regulators as required by law,” Fox said.

In 2025, FanDuel launched a “Trusted Voices” program aimed at educating parents and helping them talk to their children about gambling.

Wagers represent millions in illegal bets

Arizona alone provided nearly 300 of the underage fraud reports dating back to 2021 to USA TODAY.

This includes Brody’s story, a 16-year-old DraftKings customer.

Brody, who the paper is not identifying as he was a minor at the time, logged into the app to place a few wagers in 2024. He used an account with his dad’s name and credentials.

He made a critical error: depositing cash with his bank account, which showed he was underaged.

Mismatched names between the accounts triggered a red flag that led the betting giant’s fraud investigations unit to scrutinize the account. DraftKings swiftly used commercial data broker LexisNexis to identify Brody, his father, and soon located his high school page.

When reached on the phone, Brody’s father declined to speak to USA TODAY, expressing concern that the illegal betting could negatively impact his future college prospects. He was not charged with any crime.

Sam’s mother, Gloria spoke to USA TODAY about her experience turning her son in. Her last name is being withheld to not identify her son who was a minor at the time.

She said she was upset that the company didn’t have better safeguards to prevent it.

“I told him at the time: that’s it. This is done” Gloria told USA TODAY. “He tried to tell me how much money he was making, but that’s not the point. I was hardline, wait until you’re 21.”

Another report identified a highly-coveted frequent gambler assigned a personal host, who used BetMGM’s mobile apps to wager on sports. He was going out of town and messaged his VIP handler that his 18-year-old son would be wagering for him. The betting age in Arizona is 21. That triggered an investigation, lifetime ban and fraud report to the state. The illegal activity was filed away in Arizona’s system. The father told USA TODAY he simply didn’t understand the state’s law.

Some teens have been caught based on companies tracking their cell phones with the company GeoComply down to their high schools. Others tried using high school checking accounts triggering suspicion.

Arizona officials boast a robust paperwork collection protocol aimed to prevent, detect and stop underage gambling, said Suzanne Trainor, a Department of Gaming spokesperson.

“If a review identifies potential violations of statute, rule, or license conditions, the Department may take regulatory action against the operator, which can include corrective action plans, enforcement action, or other regulatory remedies as appropriate,” Trainor said.

They can also pass criminal referrals to law enforcement or prosecutors. Asked how many times punitive action has been taken against either patrons, underagers or companies,  Arizona officials confirmed the total since 2021 is zero.

Regulators can only push so far

The way the legalized markets has burgeoned in the United States has created some odd realities, said Les Bernal, national director of the group Stop Predatory Gambling.

“State governments are partners to this industry and can’t push too hard because they’re making so much money. They’re like the arsonists and firefighters at the same time,” Bernal said.

Plus, most of the research and work around problem gambling is funding by the industry itself, again, “it’s like putting Dracula in charge of the blood bank.”

Bernal believes the country is facing a predictable epidemic of teens, kids and mostly young men who have normalized sports betting.

“We saw it in the United Kingdom and Australia, kids grow up today thinking sports and gambling are one in the same. You’re not a sports fan if you’re not wagering. It’s a transformative experience and it’s dangerous.”

The latest information from the National Council on Problem Gambling shows adolescent problem gambling leads to a complex mix of criminal behavior, poor academic achievement, truancy, financial problems, depression, suicide and substance abuse.

That leaves people like Maynard in Massachusetts partnering with the state’s attorney general to push legal operators to be better, while attempting to crack down on illegal markets.

And while they count the number of underage fraud reports and forward some to law enforcement, “I don’t think we should be putting kids in jail over this. It’s an opportunity to educate them and parents about harmful behavior,” Maynard said in an interview with USA TODAY.

“We have to use the regulatory toolbox and bully pulpit in our public meetings to be honest about this problem and what we can realistically do to tackle it,” he said.

Massachusetts has targeted limits on advertising, “to ensure Disney on Ice doesn’t have DraftKings ads next to it” and to monitor any advertising that is false and misleading. Sportsbooks have been targeted for “Can’t lose” parlays and “risk free bets’ by regulators and lawsuits.

“Is it worth it? Yeah, I know it’s an expense to the operators to count underage access, but the aim and goal of zero is worth it,” Maynard said. “Why are we here? Why do we exist: why am I doing this? It’s to make a difference.”

Tennessee is piloting a new intervention program from young people caught gambling, said Jim Whelan, executive director of the Tennessee Institute for Gambling Education and Research at the University of Memphis.

It funnels kids into a 2 ½ hour online assessment in lieu of the misdemeanor and $50 fine.

“The top two predictors of adult problem gambling are: you have a parent with a gambling problem and starting at a young age,” Whelan said. “Kids watching sports are inundated, so we need to help then learn how to manage that exposure.”

Youth voices have suggested solutions

Problem gambling agencies are slowly adapting tipsheets for parents, curricula for teachers and recruiting young voices to tell their stories to kids.

The New Jersey native said he battled a gambling addiction for the last six years, spending about eight hours per day on sportsbooks and online casinos.

“I don’t think a punitive approach to kids gambling will help, we have to work toward counter-messaging because FanDuel and DraftKings have great KYC, but a billion dollar marketing campaign,” Minnick said. 

His message: You will lose betting on sports, and addiction can happen and needs to be taken seriously. He had to find group support, set-up financial controls (he went so far as to turn over his bank accounts to his mother) and sign up for self-exclusion lists.

Isaac Rose-Berman, 25, is a professional young gambler who has increasingly used his voice to warn about sports betting. He’s a fellow at the American Institute for Boys and Men who consulted on a study out last week by the nonprofit child protection group Common Sense Media.

The survey polled 1,017 boys nationwide 11 to 17 years old in July 2025. Of that group, 36% reported gambling in the last year. A third of the 11-year-olds reported wagering and nearly half of the 17-year-olds had. Most encountered ads for the platforms via social media and streaming video on YouTube.

Researchers found the teens were generally wagering small amounts: $54 on average across all teens who spent money on gambling over a year.

‘I only do things like that for fun,” a 16-year-old told the researchers. “I feel like I have enough willpower to quit any time. I think it’s very fun to do when you can limit yourself.”

Rose-Berman advocates for two policy changes: a crackdown on online casinos, legal in seven states and a restriction on ads.

“I just think you should be able to watch sports without the constant barrage of gambling ads,” Rose-Berman said. “Why don’t we have cigarette ads on TV? Because more than 10% of the audience is underage.”

While the youngest gamblers likely aren’t facing financial ruin — he worries the habits are having an impact on the social fabric of young society.

He can relate to the young men who wake up in the morning and immediately check their picks and constantly think about lines, like Sam, the Arizona teen once outed by his mother.

“It’s the stupidest thing ever, especially if you don’t have a lot of extra money to spend,” Gloria said. “He knows how I feel about it.”

Nick Penzenstadler is a reporter on USA TODAY’s investigative team working on national projects. Tips or questions? You can contact him via e-mail npenz@usatoday.com or on Signal at 720-507-5273

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

  • Deion Sanders recently told his Colorado football team about dousing broadcaster Tim McCarver with water in 1992.
  • Sanders said he did it because McCarver had described him as selfish for playing both baseball and football.
  • Sanders said he wanted to win the World Series MVP that year so McCarver would have to interview him.

Colorado football coach Deion Sanders told his team about the time he doused baseball broadcaster Tim McCarver with water in October 1992, calling it “wrong” but also saying “God had my back” about it.

Sanders brought up the infamous incident at a recent team meeting in Boulder, as documented by Reach The People Media, one of Sanders’ favored YouTube channels. Sanders told his team it was an example of being able to go back to a “dark place” in your past. He said, “God allows you to go into it so that you can understand who He is and his power and how He can bring you out of nothing and turn it into something.”

Sanders, 58, was playing baseball for the Atlanta Braves when he doused McCarver with tubs of water in the postgame locker room after the Braves won the National League Championship Series that year. He said it was revenge for comments McCarver previously made about Sanders that described Sanders as selfish for leaving the Braves to also play in the NFL with the Atlanta Falcons. The memory resurfaced for Sanders recently after apparently being asked about it for an upcoming film about Sanders on Netflix.

“My mother had told me this gentleman who just broadcast a game is talking about you real bad,” Sanders told his players. “And, you know, when mama talked to us like that, you act. I’m a Florida boy. Like we act immediately. So after we won the playoffs, I threw two buckets of water, which was wrong. Two buckets of water on him and doused him and doused him and doused him, and dousing them until he, you know, got upset about it. But I was thinking that he should have known his craft.”

Deion Sanders said ‘God had my back’ after Tim McCarver incident

He blamed McCarver for not doing his “homework” and not knowing Sanders’  contract with the Braves had been set to expire earlier that summer before he worked out a deal that allowed him to help the baseball team in its playoff push. Instead of being portrayed by McCarver as selfish, he said he thought it should have been portrayed as a “wonderful gesture” by him to continue playing with the team.

After dousing McCarver, the Braves advanced to the World Series to play the Toronto Blue Jays. Sanders played well against the Blue Jays, especially against Blue Jays pitcher David Cone. He suggested his success in that series was proof that God has his back about the McCarver incident. He hit .533 overall in that series with five stolen bases, but the Braves lost in six games.

“That hurt,” Sanders said of McCarver’s comments. “That hurt my mom. That hurt me. But lo and behold, God had my back. Why would I say God had my back? Because the opposing team was the Toronto Blue Jays that we played in the World Series had a pitcher on the team named David Cone. David Cone was a great pitcher. He should be in Hall of Fame. But David Cone, my lifelong average against him was about .600.”

Deion Sanders wanted to win MVP so Tim McCarver could interview him

Sanders said he would have been named World Series MVP if the Braves had won.

“But we lost,” Sanders said. “But I wanted to win so bad because that gentleman that was naysaying me (McCarver) would have had to interview me for being the MVP. And that’s what I wanted, but it didn’t happen that way. But we got into it.”

McCarver died in 2023 at age 81. After Sanders doused him with water in 1992, he confronted Sanders. “You’re a real man, Deion,” McCarver told him. “I’ll say that.”

Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Department of Justice released millions of files associated with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein on Jan. 30. Included in these files were emails exchanged by the disgraced financier and New York Giants co-owner Steve Tisch.

The NFL acknowledged it would ‘look into the matter’ in a statement released Feb. 2, just hours before NFL commissioner Roger Goodell’s annual state of the league address as part of Super Bowl opening night.

‘The league is aware of the reports and Steve’s response,’ the league said in a statement. ‘Our office will look into the matter to understand the facts.’

Goodell was asked to elaborate about the Tisch-Epstein connection and whether the 76-year-old Giants co-owner would be subject to the NFL’s personal conduct policy.

‘We are going to look at all the facts,’ Goodell said. ‘We’re going to look at the context of those and try to understand that. We’ll look at how that falls under the policy, but I think we take one step at a time. Let’s get the facts first.’

The emails show Epstein provided ‘scouting reports’ on multiple women to an account belonging to Tisch, whose email address was redacted in the files. Tisch asked in emails reviewed by The Athletic and USA TODAY if various women were ‘pros,’ ‘working girls’ or ‘civilians.’

In one of the exchanges, Tisch asks, ‘Curious about (redacted). I will contact (redacted). pro or civilian?’ Later in the correspondence, the same account states, ‘send me a number to call I don’t like records of these conversations.’

Several other email strings show Tisch’s account seeking additional information about specific women he met in New York. The emails, sent in 2013, also include an invitation from Tisch for Epstein to join him in his suite for a Giants game and various attempts for the two to meet up in New York, including invitations to go on walks and meet for lunches.

Tisch expressed regret about his his ‘brief association’ with Epstein in a statement released by the Giants shortly after the documents were made public.

‘We had a brief association where we exchanged emails about adult women, and in addition, we discussed movies, philanthropy and investments,’ Tisch said. ‘I did not take him up on any of his invitations and never went to his island. As we all know now, he was a terrible person and someone I deeply regret associating with.’

Tisch has been Giants chairman and co-owner since 2005. The 76-year-old movie producer has notably helped create several hit films – including ‘Forrest Gump’ and ‘Risky Business’ – and has a John Madden biopic, which stars Nicolas Cage, set to release in 2026.

Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges.

USA TODAY Sports’ Eric Larsen also contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Across the NCAA, 37 of the top players departed for Olympic national teams, and another handful will find themselves at a six-nations tournament in Austria. 

The change stripped NCAA hockey of seven of the top 10 scorers nationally, with major programs like Wisconsin, Minnesota and Ohio State playing with shortened benches due to their absences.The Olympic women’s hockey tournament lasts from Thursday, Feb. 5 to Thursday, Feb. 19. The six-nations tournament in Austria, meanwhile, started on Monday and ends Feb. 8. But women’s college hockey continues, with games every week in that span.

Here’s a look at the top 10 NCAA women’s hockey programs this week:

Women’s college hockey power rankings

1. University of Wisconsin (WCHA)

After dropping its first game of the weekend to Minnesota, Wisconsin’s team responded well despite being without its top players. The Badgers got key performances from forwards Lacey Eden and Cassie Hall, as well as defender Vivian Jungels, who all had multi-point nights in their 6-1 win to close out the weekend.

2. Ohio State University (WCHA)

Despite dressing only five defenders and eight forwards, Ohio State swept Minnesota-Duluth, whose struggles continued this past weekend. Few have been better in NCAA hockey in the last month than Jocelyn Amos, who scored four goals this past weekend for the Buckeyes. It was also netminder Hailey MacLeod’s most consistent back-to-back showings to date, which should give OSU fans hope for the home stretch.

3. University of Minnesota (WCHA)

Minnesota fans should be hopeful for the future. With their youth leading, the Gophers took the opener of their series 3-2 over No. 1 Wisconsin. They couldn’t replicate it in the second game of the series, but without Abbey Murphy, Josefin Bouveng, Nelli Laitinen and others, it was a tall order to face Wisconsin, even without its Olympians.

4. Penn State (AHA)

It was against Robert Morris, but sweeping a weekend series without captain and program superstar Tessa Janecke is still important. Game 1 of their series was a rare outdoor game at Beaver Stadium. Rookie defender Danica Maynard continues to emerge as one of the nation’s best offensive defenders. She’s a smooth skater with deceptive puck skills.

5. Northeastern (Hockey East)

Holy Cross gave Northeastern as much as it could handle last weekend with a pair of one-goal decisions in favor of the Huskies. It was as much a sign of Holy Cross’ growth as it was a negative about Northeastern. Defender Jules Constantinople had an exceptional weekend, including a late-tying goal in the series opener, and rookie Stryker Zablocki continues to make a name for herself, flashing her speed and offensive capabilities.

6. Princeton (ECAC)

Princeton has one of the best top lines in the nation with Mackenzie Alexander, who scored in the Tigers’ wins over Clarkson and St. Lawrence, and Issy Wunder. Princeton, however, is not a one-trick pony. They have received contributions from up and down their lineup, and this season, one of the biggest difference-makers has been netminder Uma Corniea. This past weekend, she stopped 73 of the 74 shots she faced.

7. Quinnipiac (ECAC)

As if the pressure of becoming a top-five team got to Quinnipiac, it dropped games to Clarkson and St. Lawrence. Both opponents managed to keep Kahlen Lamarche from scoring, and both managed to solve Felicia Frank. The Bobcats need the rest of their roster to step up to get it done if they want to climb back in time for the playoffs.

8. Yale (ECAC)

They didn’t face particularly tough opponents in RPI and Union College, but Yale did exactly as it should, putting together two decisive wins. Seniors Carina DiAntonio and Jordan Ray have been exceptional for Yale in the second half of the season, upping both of their statuses for the PWHL draft.

9. Cornell (ECAC)

Cornell dropped a game to Harvard, which hurt, although it’s not Harvard’s first win this season against a ranked opponent. Cornell also shut out Dartmouth 5-0 with five different goal-scorers hitting the scoresheet. If Cornell could put together balanced offensive games like its win over Dartmouth more often, it could make some noise.

10. University of Minnesota-Duluth (WCHA)

It’s hard to explain the slide Minnesota-Duluth has gone on this month, earning only a single win in its last 10 games. Another weekend out of the win column and they’ll slide from the top 10 altogether. Facing a short-benched Ohio State, Minnesota-Duluth squandered a golden opportunity against a conference opponent. Time is running out for the Bulldogs as the playoffs approach.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Drake Maye is looking to join Tom Brady as the only quarterbacks to ever lead the New England Patriots to a Super Bowl victory.

As Maye prepares to do that, some of the guidance the legendary quarterback has given him over his career has been rattling around in his brain.

Maye was asked at Super Bowl opening night about the best advice he had received from Brady.

‘I’ve met Tom a few times, and one of the best things he said is there’s no shortcuts to it,’ Maye told reporters. ‘There’s no shortcuts to putting in the work. The proof’s in the pudding.’

‘Knowing that the shortcuts that people can try to take – it’s not worth it,’ he added. ‘Get the most out of what you put into it. He’s been great at that and he obviously showed that throughout his career.’

Brady earned a reputation as one of the NFL’s hardest workers during his fruitful 23-year career. He won a player-record seven Super Bowls across his 23 seasons and finished his career as the NFL’s all-time leader in passing yards (89,214) and passing touchdowns (649).

Maye is a long way away from matching Brady, but he showed immense improvement during his second NFL season. He completed 72% of his passes during the regular season for 4,394 yards, 31 touchdowns and eight interceptions while adding 450 yards and four touchdowns on the ground to play himself into the NFL MVP race.

Maye’s much-improved second season will culminate with him becoming the second-youngest quarterback to start a Super Bowl behind only Dan Marino. He will also have a chance to match Brady’s feat of earning his first Super Bowl ring in his second NFL campaign.

Even so, Maye isn’t yet entertaining any of the Brady comparisons he has drawn amid his first-ever Super Bowl run.

‘I appreciate his greatness,’ Maye said of Brady. ‘What he did for my team that I play for now, what he did for football, what he’s done for my position that I play. Just respect for how he played the game, how he wanted to win so bad, how he carried his teammates, how he led his teammates, how he approached the sport.

‘[I want to] pay respect to him, but not try to be him and just try to be myself.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY